General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am ROYALLY PISSED at Facebook this morning!
A former co-worker, who happens to be from Ukraine, posted a photo about the latest Russian missile strike in Odesa which killed a mother and her three-month-old baby. I replied to the post that it made me want to burn the Kremlin to the ground, with Vlad P. in it. Facebook REMOVED my post, telling me that I was "inciting violence." - - - - - -
Who the hell WOULDN'T be "inciting violence" against Vlad after that act?? I filed my appeal with them, telling them at the end that FB might want to avoid acting as a Putin tool, that Vlad was smiling at their decision to remove my post.
CurtEastPoint
(18,663 posts)and FB 'covered' it. FIVE YEARS AGO.
NameAlreadyTaken
(981 posts)I've complained so many times about vicious, nasty posts, and Facebook just lets them stay up. They clearly have multiple standards.
Ocelot II
(115,836 posts)while deleting harmless things because its algorithms are stupid.
Celerity
(43,499 posts)secondwind
(16,903 posts)I dont think humans are involved. Just my two cents.
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)Anger not withstanding, advocating violence (even as a rant) isn't acceptable, and angry rants on Facebook are precisely the sort of thing people have complained about in the past. "Trump/Putin does it" isn't acceptable as an argument (and neither of them have Facebook accounts where they're doing it).
lastlib
(23,286 posts)wanting to burn Berchtesgaden with Adolf Hitler in it?
(I'll just leave it at that)
brooklynite
(94,727 posts)American citizens were being killed by Germany.
stopdiggin
(11,361 posts)or my local church.
The local beer hall might have presented another case - but then that would have kind of depended on what the owner felt like allowing. Right?
stopdiggin
(11,361 posts)then you're contributing to the toxic atmosphere. Tone it down.
(To be clear. Not a big fan, and I use it very sparingly. But we blame FB, et.al. for not trying to de-fang and declaw - clean up the mess - then blame the efforts that they do make)
HipChick
(25,485 posts)I decline to be emotionally trigged by services I don't pay for..
LuckyCharms
(17,458 posts)You are exactly correct.
Users are not charged, in fact, the users are their product.
I was on it for awhile. Nothing that Facebook did in particular pissed me off, but the entire dynamic that I personally witnessed (I'm not suggesting that everyone has the same experience as me), was not something I wanted to be a part of.
So I figure there are 3 options when dissatisfied with FB, depending on the reason you are dissatisfied:
1) Stay
2) Leave
3) Rally support to encourage Facebook to change their business model to one in which users pay a substantial fee to be a member, and therefore, have more freedom to control their experience, or decide which posts stay and which posts get deleted.
I chose to leave. Pretty easy choice in my case.
Zeitghost
(3,868 posts)But FB is not free, you just happen to be the product being sold and not the customer.
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)I had a similar post removed!
samnsara
(17,635 posts)Takket
(21,625 posts)and I'll bet you found thousands of posts with thousands of shares.............
Cuthbert Allgood
(4,965 posts)so using the phrase "burn x to the ground" probably isn't a great decision.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,339 posts)It was reversed within an hour.
My account was temporarily locked. Apparently I have two strikes from a meme I posted twice - the meme with Trump in a sleeper hold saying whos sleepy now, b*tch. Those where zonked 6+ months after they were posted.
usonian
(9,867 posts)The violence that FB (Meta) does is to truth.
And they get away with it.
I watched the internet grow from the day it changed from a research network to a commercial one.
The ONLY people who could extract a buck were porn sites.
Nobody else could figure a way to make a buck, none of the "geniuses" ... not Larry Page nor Sergey Brin, nor Zuck nor the forgotten internet roadkill. Thank goodness that Wikipedia and the Internet Archive and a few others survive on donations.
MOST TURNED TO ADVERTISING,
and that's the day that quantity trounced quality.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/oct/24/advertising-poison-hooked
Advertising is a poison that demeans even love and we're hooked on it
This article is more than 10 years old
George Monbiot
A MUST READ.
World's shortest pull-quote:
Pervasiveness and repetition act like a battering ram against our minds.
Hey, this is violence.
ZUCK YOU FUCKERBERG and all the ad-driven, now surveillance-driven dystopian monstrosities.
FakeNoose
(32,748 posts)The truth is that Facebook (the company) doesn't give a rat's-ass what anybody posts - UNTIL it gets reported. Most likely the person who reported you is a RWNJ, Magat, and Putin-lover.
I quit FB over a year ago and it no longer concerns me. But I have a suggestion for you, if you plan to stay on there and continue to fight the morons. When you make a political statement, be sure it's not so bluntly "liberal-sounding" because that's what the RWNJ's react to. If you can write it in a way that gets the point across indirectly and use some $3 words that they won't exactly understand, then they usually give it a pass.
Good luck my friend!
LeftInTX
(25,555 posts)I had few posts auto-removed. I protested and they reinstated them. The posts were for benign things such as a black cat on Friday the 13th...(FB said it was spam)