General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSweden and Finland have agreed to submit applications to join Nato at the same time, perSwedish news
Last edited Mon Apr 25, 2022, 01:26 PM - Edit history (1)
Sweden and Finland have agreed to submit applications to join Nato at the same time, the Swedish newspaper Expressen reports.
Both countries have agreed to announce their applications in the week of 16 to 22 May, during Finlands president Sauli Niinistös visit to Stockholm, according to Swedish government sources.
Guardian news feed
Update, The Finnish daily Iltalehti said on Monday that Stockholm had suggested the two countries indicate their willingness to join on the same day, and that Helsinki had agreed as long as the Swedish government has made its decision.
The Swedish newspaper Expressen cited government sources as confirming the report. The two countries prime ministers said this month they were deliberating the question, arguing Russias invasion of Ukraine had changed Europes whole security landscape and dramatically shaped mindsets in the Nordic region.
Finlands prime minister, Sanna Marin, said then that her country, which shares a 1,300km (810 mile) border with Russia, would decide whether to apply to join the alliance quite fast, in weeks not months, despite the risk of infuriating Moscow.
Her Swedish counterpart, Magdalena Andersson, said Sweden had to be prepared for all kinds of actions from Russia and that everything had changed when Moscow attacked Ukraine. Russia has repeatedly warned both countries against the move.
Torchlight
(3,344 posts)to a point its not seen in many years. I think Putin's war may be one bridge too far for him, and the fallout from this might see him 'retire' to some extravagantly ugly dacha.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)gab13by13
(21,363 posts)Had Biden not taken the lead, it is possible that Russia would have taken over Ukraine by now. Finland and Sweden would have 2nd thoughts had not NATO responded so forcefully, and that is because of president Biden.
Putin and Trump sorely underestimated president Biden.
RKP5637
(67,111 posts)JohnSJ
(92,273 posts)ripcord
(5,439 posts)yaesu
(8,020 posts)application process. I don't remember any countries being "thrown to the wolves" by NATO.
ripcord
(5,439 posts)It has been mostly France and Germany who have kept Ukraine out but the U.S. also opposed the move, we wouldn't want to upset Putin now would we? Now that there is an actual war and no chance for Ukraine to join the open door policy is back in place for Finland and Sweden, two countries who have refused to join for over 70 years. Nice to see that NATO has its priorities in order.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)Tadpole Raisin
(972 posts)in the country. They had to meet certain criteria and just werent there. Even though the Putin puppet Yanukovych left in 2015 I dont think his successors were much better.
Too bad Zelenskyy didnt get in sooner. Makes me wonder if that was also a motivation for Putin to invade. Maybe he thought this was the first time Ukraine might have a shot at getting into NATO if Zelenskyy enacted reforms where as before this wasnt possible. Putin could not let that happen.
It just pleases me no end that Putin is likely pissed at Sweden and Finland.
Ocelot II
(115,761 posts)with NATO and have been working with the alliance for some time. Otherwise there's still a process:
The Swedish newspaper Dagens Nyheter experiences that the supplement can be presented before the NATO summit in Madrid at the end of June.
Finally, the supplement must be ratified by all 30 member countries. This can take several months, and takes place in different ways in each country. In the United States, the Senate must approve the protocol amendment by a two-thirds majority, while in the United Kingdom, Parliament does not have to hold a formal vote.
Thus, Sweden and Finland can be members of NATO during the autumn.
ripcord
(5,439 posts)I remember when NATO promised Georgia and Ukraine membership but then they let Putin veto it.
Ocelot II
(115,761 posts)Plans for NATO membership were shelved by Ukraine following the 2010 presidential election in which Yanukovych, who, because of his pro-Russia stance, preferred to keep the country non-aligned, was elected. Yanukovych was ousted and fled Ukraine in February 2014. He now lives in exile in Russia. There have also been lingering internal problems resulting from the corruption of the former government which, per NATO rules, have to be addressed before it can join the alliance.
ripcord
(5,439 posts)At the NATO Summit last June NATO promised Ukraine membership again, they also promised the right for them to determine their own future without interference, we all know how that worked out. The reason Ukraine isn't in NATO is weak knees in Europe.
Amishman
(5,557 posts)One of the criteria for NATO membership is having no territorial disputes. Russia's funding of separatists in neighbors is a two-fer for them. It blocks the country from NATO membership, and sets the plate for Russia to take a nibble if the opportunity arises.
Ukraine and Georgia's prior internal unrest and corruption issues were also problems.
Sweden and Finland have stable governments and no disputes.
James48
(4,437 posts)Ukraine didnt have any disputes either when it announced it wanted to join NATO. The dispute and invasion of Crimea came as a result of Ukraine announcing it was going to pursue NATO membership.
Its an extraordinarily dangerous thing for Sweden and Finland to wait until a month from now.
ripcord
(5,439 posts)Then they let Putin veto it, they give a lot of power to the someone outside the alliance. Zelensky may have been right when he called for new alliances and new institutions because despite NATO's alleged open door policy and the goal of defending Europe all they have done is cover their asses. I have serious doubts France and Germany would give any more than lip service to a NATO member who was attacked.
Mike Nelson
(9,961 posts)... Putin is doing better than the Clintons!
Sogo
(4,988 posts)until AFTER they become NATO members....
IMHO....
yaesu
(8,020 posts)is great propaganda for the west can only hurt, not help putins criminal ambitions.
oldsoftie
(12,564 posts)Neutral countries joining NATO!
rockfordfile
(8,704 posts)James48
(4,437 posts)Only because they have not YET submitted.
Putin knows, from the Crimea invasion, that all he has to do is launch a war and NATO will put the application on hold. I would not put it past Putin to be angry and launch a war to prevent them from joining!
Both nations need to apply TODAY before Putin can launch another attack.
Come on Sweden and Finland- apply TODAY!
Beetwasher.
(2,977 posts)Seriously.
James48
(4,437 posts)Sweden and Finland both are quiet well equipped for a potential NATO country.
Sweden: 52,000 active and reserve military forces, and another 38,000 militias.
Swedish army possesses: 240 tanks, 212 tank destroyers, around 1,300 APCs, 860 IFVs, 11,300 utility vehicles, 220 mortars, and currently 4 (24 when all are delivered) 155 mm self-propelled artillery pieces. Swedish Air Force: 217 aircraft, including more than 100 fighters. Swedish NAVY: almost 2 dozen ships, and 147 patrol boats.
More: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_Swedish_Armed_Forces
Finland is also militarily strong: almost 1,000 armored vehicles, 200 tanks, and much, much more.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_equipment_of_the_Finnish_Army
Beetwasher.
(2,977 posts)Sucha NastyWoman
(2,749 posts)Have they not proved themselves to be worthy?
And if it were a done deal, I think there might be a good chance Putin would back off?
ripcord
(5,439 posts)Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)Martin Eden
(12,872 posts)His invasion of Ukraine has made NATO more relevant and necessary than it has been since the breakup of the Soviet Union.