Something tells me they wouldn't be amenable to sharing the permanent Security Council seat though

[ck4829]

Blinken said, “And I firmly disagree with that proposition. It is the fundamental right of these countries to choose their own destiny.”

Paul argued that the countries that were attacked were part of the Soviet Union since the 1920s, and Blinken responded, “That does not give Russia the right to attack them.”

The words that were coming out of Rand Paul’s mouth during the hearing were Russian talking points. Russian state media and Putin have attempted to justify the invasion of Ukraine because Ukraine used to be a part of the Soviet Union.

https://www.politicususa.com/2022/04/26/rand-paul-busted-for-using-russian-talking-points-in-senate-hearing.html

If it's so important that Ukraine and Georgia were part of the Soviet Union, then why should it just be Russia with that seat, that doesn't sound very fair, right?

OK, since the USSR is still shaping world affairs, I propose that the former USSR countries share the USSR's permanent Security Council seat on a rotating basis. Russia gets a month, Armenia gets a month, Azerbaijan gets a month, Estonia gets a month, Georgia gets a month, Ukraine gets a month, and so on.

[Phoenix61]

1. We were part of Britain so I guess Rand would be cool

with Britain taking back her property? Or Spain doing the same? WTAF is wrong with him. As others have said, I get Rand’s neighbor, I don’t approve but I absolutely understand.

[Midnight Writer]

2. I reckon Rand Paul is cool with Middle Eastern countries attacking Israel, following his logic.

[ck4829]

3. Bolivia has a claim to attack Chile following that logic too

Since they became landlocked after the War of the Pacific.

Republicans promoting peace.

[Midnight Writer]

4. And Russia has a right to invade Alaska. Mexico can take Texas. And Spain can have Florida.