Dave Wasserman on 2022 redistricting
Link to tweet
?s=21&t=89cZ7nFz3BESpJYTnpjAdA
Link to tweet
?s=21&t=89cZ7nFz3BESpJYTnpjAdA
= new reply since forum marked as read
With NY now tossed, atm the Rethugs are back to a net +9 seats gained, with 4 states including NY now, (40 total districts between the 4 states) to go
https://www.politico.com/interactives/2022/congressional-redistricting-maps-by-state-and-district/
Also the US Supreme Court has been beating us down now too in the past few weeks
Democrats’ redistricting gains hit a roadblock: The Supreme Court
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/04/15/supreme-court-redistricting/
April 15, 2022
Wisconsin Democrats thought they had won the redistricting war. They took over the governor’s office, competed in and won state judicial races and filed lawsuits as early as they could, determined to prevent another cycle of Republican-leaning maps. After a battle between Democratic Gov. Tony Evers and Republican legislators, a conservative judge sided with Evers, rejecting a Republican-drawn legislative map in favor of one that was better for Democrats. But Republicans took their case to the U.S. Supreme Court — and won. “It was a Hail Mary’s Hail Mary, not something we were very focused on,” said Ben Wikler, the chair of Wisconsin’s Democratic Party. “But here we are.”
After a redistricting cycle that initially went better than expected for Democrats, the conservative Supreme Court has bolstered Republican efforts to reverse that trend, with more cases in the wings from GOP attorneys and legislators from multiple states. Alabama Republicans persuaded the Supreme Court to override a lower court’s ruling that would have forced the state to draw two congressional districts with large Black voting blocs. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis has laid the groundwork for a legal battle over his desire to eliminate a district with a plurality of Black voters. Ohio Republicans, who have repeatedly lost in the state Supreme Court over gerrymandered maps, is waging a parallel legal fight in a more favorable federal court.
What worries Democrats and voting rights advocates most is the potential that the Supreme Court will validate a legal theory that state legislatures alone must draw political maps — a judgment that would give lawmakers final say over redistricting, stripping out the role that governors, judges and even independent commissions set up by voters have in the process. North Carolina Republicans have asked the court to weigh in; Republicans in other states, such as Pennsylvania and Ohio, have endorsed the idea, known colloquially as the “independent state legislature theory.”
If adopted, Democrats and voting rights advocates say, state legislatures — many of them gerrymandered to maximize control — would obtain unprecedented power. “It would be Defcon 1 to democracy,” said David Pepper, former Democratic state party chairman in Ohio. “They’re coming up with multiple ways to get around the fact that state Supreme Courts have risen as the strongest check on these gerrymandered state legislatures,” Pepper said. “Declaring statehouses beyond judicial review would be devastating to democracy. They basically are already not accountable at the polls, so the only thing we have at this point is courts to hold them into check.”
snip
