General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlvin Braggs reasoning for not bringing charges against Donald Trump.
Washington PostHe says that he met with investigators from the DAs office about a dozen times before Dunne and Pomerantz left, but that no one from Braggs team has contacted him since. Pomerantzs resignation letter, which was obtained by The Washington Post, echoed what Cohen has said publicly about the nature of the evidence, including statements of Trumps financial condition that were submitted to lenders and other parties.
Trumps financial statements were false, and he has a long history of fabricating information relating to his personal finances and lying about his assets to banks, the national media, counterparties, and many others, including the American people, Pomerantz wrote.
Cohen pleaded guilty to tax evasion, campaign finance violations and giving false information to a bank for his role in negotiating hush-money payments to adult-film actress Stormy Daniels, allegedly on Trumps behalf, during the 2016 campaign. Trump has said he was not involved with paying off Daniels and has denied having an affair with her. Cohen also pleaded guilty to lying to Congress about his role in a Trump Organization project in Russia.
While using witnesses convicted of crimes, especially lying, can be problematic, it is not unheard of for prosecutors to do so, especially when they have few other ways to make their case. Cohens prison sentence is complete, so prosecutors cannot offer him a benefit in exchange for his participation, which could boost his credibility before a jury.
Not nearly as much fun as claiming bribery or blackmail.....
gab13by13
(21,375 posts)There were more people than Cohen involved. There were other people corroborating Cohen's testimony. Then there are documents, documents don't lie.
My #1 reason for calling bs on Bragg dropping the case is the two prosecutors' opinion. Those two prosecutors have much more experience and credibility than Alvin Bragg. If those two prosecutors believed they could win the case that is good enough for me.
All of the reasons that you listed to cover for Alvin are saying that Alvin knows more than the 2 prosecutors who worked on the case for 2 years, and Pomerantz worked for free. Two years down the drain to let a criminal walk again.
Bev54
(10,059 posts)boss would have ever been indicted in NY city. Ridiculous but then I guess that is the only excuse he has.
Scrivener7
(50,957 posts)It's NYC, it's Donald Trump, it's longstanding tradition.
paleotn
(17,931 posts)Nothing to see here. Move along. Move along.
jalan48
(13,874 posts)Hotler
(11,431 posts)When one door closes, another one opens. On Monday, evidence of Donnies attempt to commit election fraud will start being presented to a Fulton County GA. Grand Jury, and Lordy, we have tapes in that case.
gab13by13
(21,375 posts)why didn't DOJ run a parallel investigation? I wish the Fulton County DA well, she has her hands full, has to keep her 2 prosecutors names a secret for security reasons, and has bought them bullet proof vests.
We really cant be sure that DOJ is not running an investigation into this as well.
gab13by13
(21,375 posts)Michael Cohen can't be trusted. lol. Michael Cohen is a convicted felon. lol. Michael Cohen is a convicted felon because he worked for a mob boss who ordered him to deliver a hush money check to Stormy Daniels that was signed by Donald Trump. So we can't believe Cohen because Cohen worked for an unindicted criminal, Donald Trump. Merrick Garland chose not to prosecute Trump for the Stormy Daniels hush money when Bob Mueller laid all the evidence out and designated Trump as "individual one."
Once again we are reminded that Trump is above the law, that would have been a much shorter and believable reason why no one prosecutes him.
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)... etc.
He should face the same laws anyone else would face in such an egregious flaunting of the law
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)trump first day on the job, with or without sufficient evidence.
Cohen would be a great witness. He'd have us in stitches.
dalton99a
(81,534 posts)W_HAMILTON
(7,869 posts)If not having faith in unsavory characters -- even ones WITH PAPER TRAIL EVIDENCE -- is considered a good excuse not to move forward with indictments, I assume we will see very few indictments from this D.A. given that many criminals are done in by their fellow criminals in exchange for plea deals and the like.
former9thward
(32,035 posts)And sent to prison for it. Also in those run of the mill cases the target criminal will plea out and thus there will be no trial where an informing criminal can be cross examined and discredited.
CivicGrief
(147 posts)Instead of bribery or blackmail, let's try cowardice.
brooklynite
(94,635 posts)I don't obsess over politics every hour of the day, and I don't dream up conspiracies to worry about. I find that helps.
(Now, excuse me, I have a party to plan for this evening...)
CivicGrief
(147 posts)It doesn't surprise me that you don't care whether Trump is ever held accountable and it bothers you that others do. Enjoy your social climbing.
Midnight Writer
(21,771 posts)Tommy Carcetti
(43,185 posts)10-4.
hamsterjill
(15,222 posts)So, if no one goes after Trump because he might get off, the result is that Trump stays untouched.
If no one goes after Trump, he stays untouched.
Whats the difference?
Someone needs to try, at least. Theres nothing to lose.
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)He will be voted out of office in his next election.
brooklynite
(94,635 posts)...who doesn't watch endless hours of cable news shows and doesn't hang out on political blogs, and who are presently concerned about crime in their neighborhood, will decide on retaining Bragg or not based on what happens to Trump?
FakeNoose
(32,672 posts)Why did Alvin Bragg even want to run for office, is the question they need to ask. In his campaign Bragg frequently told NYC voters that he wouldn't back off from the Chump indictments. And now that he's in office, that's exactly what he's done.
kentuck
(111,106 posts)...it looks like he may have been paid off.
Just the appearance, mind you.
Maybe he knew more than the prosecutors that were investigating the case?
iemanja
(53,037 posts)To be infallible? This all the while ignoring there is a great deal of difference among Democrats on the issue, including between Bragg and his own department as well as the former DA.
He doesn't need to be blackmailed to do the wrong thing. The very text you cite gives reasons why Cohen could be a credible witness. The jury is ultimately the ones who make the determination about witness credibility, but that supposes a Prosecutor actually wants to hold a target accountable to the law, which Bragg obviously doesn't.
That is the question you must defend, Brooklynite. Why do you agree that Trump should not be held accountable to the same laws others have to follow?
FelineOverlord
(3,580 posts)Hes getting clobbered on Twitter.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet