General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI can't help but wonder about this, regarding Zelenskyy...
Suppose the Russian invasion ends, and Zelenskyy celebrates victory.
Then what?
Back in the 70's, I saw liberals celebrating the end of the Shah's regime, and the Ayatollah Khomeni and his people taking power.
I had my doubts about him, since he was openly a religious fascist.
But some liberals said not to worry.
How is it in Iran nowadays?
So would Zelenskyy set himself up as a dictator too?
JI7
(89,252 posts)COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)Big, big difference. Hes the anti-autocrat.
Archae
(46,335 posts)All too often we see people like Orban in Hungary.
comradebillyboy
(10,154 posts)Democracy allows people we don't like to be elected.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)True Dough
(17,305 posts)People in glass houses and all that...
Well, at least the ship has been righted, for now.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)After the Shah fled there was a referendum and Khomeni won a landslide victory.
Bettie
(16,110 posts)Zelenskyy and Khomeni or between a Russian invasion of Ukraine and an internal power struggle Iran.
PatSeg
(47,501 posts)KS Toronado
(17,259 posts)They're kind of polar opposites.
DFW
(54,405 posts)I doubt theres anyone who considers that to be a realistic scenario.
hatrack
(59,587 posts)Oh, and DC, of course.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)He was democratically elected.
Archae
(46,335 posts)But I had my doubts about Khomeni, and some liberals just shrugged and said "Well, he ain't the Shah..."
He wasn't, but he ended up being worse.
I hope Zelenskyy doesn't let the adulation go to his head.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)Tommy Carcetti
(43,182 posts)
Ukrainians have ways of dealing with Presidents who abuse the democratic process.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Revolution_of_Dignity
But lets not assume were going in that direction, okay?
Archae
(46,335 posts)Samrob
(4,298 posts)Iran has never invaded another country except for Iraq in self-defense from Iraq with out backing was attacking them. Iran has never expressed the desire for nuclear power except for domestic purposes although they are truly surrounded by hostile countries with nukes.
We overthrew a democratically elected leader of Iran and placed a brutal puppet leader over them and turned them further against us when we offered shelter and medical help for said brutal leader.
JI7
(89,252 posts)being oppressed by the religious powers .
I agree with the history and our fault there. But currently the problem is the people in power in the country.
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)They neither address the parallels between Iran and Ukraine suggested in the OP, nor excuse the oppressive rule of the ayatollahs' regime over their own people.
And even within the scope of foreign policy, these sentiments don't take into account Iran's involvement in Syria, Iraq, Lebanon, Yemen and Gaza, not to mention the ever-escalating regional conflict between Shiah and Sunni muslim states, and the impending nuclear threat by Iran to the entire region.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)DFW
(54,405 posts)Bordering on Iran are Russia, Pakistan, and nuclear-armed NATO (Turkey).
former9thward
(32,023 posts)Certainly not hostile. Pakistan and Turkey have a small percentage of Iran's total border but I don't think either country can be classified as "hostile" towards Iran.
DFW
(54,405 posts)Any neighbor in that region can turn hostile in the blink of an eye. Our NATO ally, Turkey, is not one, under Erdogan, anyway, on whom I would depend to join us in a tight situation. All alliances in that region are ones of convenience, and therefore potentially hostile.
If China, for example, were to rekindle its territorial dispute with India by force, Pakistan would support China. If China were to start a land grab against both, however, Pakistan and India would resist jointly. They would still be at each others throats again once the outside threat was over. This is not the US-Canadian border.
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)He is putting his life on the line to make Ukraine one of Europe's liberal democracies. An idea that Islamist despots would find appalling.
...How did Khomeni end up in a Zelensky post anyway?
mucifer
(23,550 posts)Jewish nazi dictator President.
We all know that.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)Take what some unknown liberals (who were not the mainstream opinion) said over 40 years ago about a completely different situation (a revolution against a dictator, in which some liberal Iranians were quickly overwhelmed by the religious extremists), and desperately try to shoehorn that into a democratically-elected president leading a country against an external invasion.
Your basis for this is "liberals like Zelenskyy; I once knew a few liberals who liked the Ayatollah Khomeni at first. Therefore, we must ask if Zelenskyy might become a dictator too".
This could be applied to anyone liked by any liberal. Liberals like Biden? Ooohh, would Biden set himself up as a dictator too? Liberals like Jacinda Ardern? Oohh, would she set herself up as a dictator too? Liberals like DU? Oohh, is DU fascist like the ayotollah?
This is an absurd thread. Self-delete, before it becomes even more clownish.
mcar
(42,334 posts)I was trying to figure out a response to this bizarre OP. You said it better.
I'm thinking he's a lucky guy if this is all that's on his mind...the sky is falling mentality has been prevalent these last few years.
PortTack
(32,778 posts)KY_EnviroGuy
(14,492 posts)Quote: "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men..."
......Lord Acton (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Dalberg-Acton,_1st_Baron_Acton)
Such is the persistent fallacy of placing far too much power and/or wealth in the hands of too few individuals, and of human complacency and hubris, particularly in times of extremes (either prosperity or conflict).
Greed, selfishness, tribalism, territorialism and the need of a strong leader figure in many people may in the end be the causes of our downfall.
KY
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)The Iranians revolted against the shah and installed the Ayatollah.
Zelenskyy was ELECTED TO OFFICE.
Get out of here with this idiotic comparison.
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)The OP seems completely ridiculous.
2naSalit
(86,646 posts)Currently defending democracy in an all out war. How does that translate to becoming a dictator just because he was successful?
CrackityJones75
(2,403 posts)WTF?
If the Ukranians prevail. How could shit go really bad? I guess I dont get it.
Quixote1818
(28,946 posts)Archae
(46,335 posts)Popular figures have "gone dictator" before.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)known fascist, genocidal dictator, Putin.
At this point I'm much more worried about impending dictatorship in my own country.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)Archae
(46,335 posts)He running that country into the sewer, while enriching himself, his family and cronies.
All while saying how he's "One of the good guys" for votes.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)yardwork
(61,650 posts)Thank you. Sometimes laughter is best.
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)It's been a long time now but I don't remember anyone on the left celebrating his ascension to power. There was broad anti Ayatollah sentiment in the US especially after the hostages were taken at our embassy. Then there was Iran Contra.
Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)I have no idea why you think Zelensky would be a dictator ala the Ayatollah of iran. That makes no sense.
obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)Your post is garbage.