General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat exactly would this "Disinformation Board" do?
And please keep it simple.
patphil
(6,182 posts)Mad_Machine76
(24,414 posts)debunking stuff like this?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216645157
Never heard of it.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)at his disposal to disarm the Disinformation...
sop
(10,193 posts)to the homeland." How a government board will "address disinformation" remains a mystery. Still, I can see why Republicans feel threatened by it; spreading dangerous disinformation is pretty much all they do.
leftstreet
(36,109 posts)It's beyond cringe
ChazII
(6,205 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,670 posts)While I worry most about a repub admin running this, I'm not completely sure Dems would do much better.
Tough one. Let the private fact checkers handle this.
lapfog_1
(29,205 posts)haven't used them in some time... but they were a go to site to debunk shit
Igel
(35,320 posts)Alexander Of Assyria
(7,839 posts)Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)"What's the most dystopian name we can give a government organization that monitors speech?"
"What about The Disinformation Governance Board for the Department of Homeland Security?"
"Brilliant! What shall its powers be if people ask?"
"Just be vague. People trust us."
"We deserve a raise."
Yes, let's have the government determine what is or is not true. What could possibly go wrong?
It's such an outrageously dumb, anti-speech, authoritarian idea, I can't believe our side isn't at least raising an eyebrow in its direction.
Tommy Carcetti
(43,182 posts)Tommy Carcetti
(43,182 posts)And thats it.
Its not propaganda.
Its not making spreading disinformation illegal.
Its just a check on it, take it or leave it.