Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(269,174 posts)
Wed May 4, 2022, 07:57 AM May 2022

Let me make this pellucidly clear

Damaging evidence is about to dominate television re Jan 6 and other timelines re the failed coup and suddenly as if on cue we hear that the SC leak is an insurrection against the Supreme Court by left wing radicals.
Everything about this smells of ReTHUG operatives.
Truth will out. I smell an inside job. I would start my investigation with evil coup insider Lady G and UT. 😀😀

52 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Let me make this pellucidly clear (Original Post) malaise May 2022 OP
Adding link to another thread malaise May 2022 #1
I'm on the same wavelength. FalloutShelter May 2022 #2
I like this post malaise May 2022 #7
Roe is immensely popular MadameButterfly May 2022 #20
There it is... FalloutShelter May 2022 #23
There is actually less than 30% who support doing away with Roe v. Wade. Texin May 2022 #33
Yeah, people believe abortion is bad for other people, that's why men MadameButterfly May 2022 #52
The immediate unified right wing speculation and spin is telling to me underpants May 2022 #3
Agree malaise May 2022 #8
I agree malaise FoxNewsSucks May 2022 #4
Yes! FM123 May 2022 #5
LOL malaise May 2022 #10
The disproportion in attention is galling. Baitball Blogger May 2022 #6
I smell malaise May 2022 #9
Good one! We all should ̶s̶t̶e̶a̶l̶ borrow that "Gin and Tomic". usaf-vet May 2022 #19
It all yours malaise May 2022 #22
It's all ours? usaf-vet May 2022 #25
LOL malaise May 2022 #32
Ginny. Scrivener7 May 2022 #11
And Tomic malaise May 2022 #12
Yup Scrivener7 May 2022 #17
EXACTLY. ancianita May 2022 #13
My thoughts exactly, glad to see we're all on the same wavelength Cozmo May 2022 #14
Now that's what I call a dollop of HEALTHY paranoia ! eppur_se_muova May 2022 #15
That could be true, although within a few weeks Wednesdays May 2022 #16
Not sure malaise May 2022 #24
thank you because Tickle May 2022 #18
The Supreme Court has been corrupted. No more words at present. Evolve Dammit May 2022 #21
Here're "a few more words". jaxexpat May 2022 #28
I knew it was corrupt when they stopped counting ballots in 2000. Silly me. The Boltons and Stones Evolve Dammit May 2022 #34
malaise, I admire your optimism 867-5309. May 2022 #26
The televised hearings are going to change everything KS Toronado May 2022 #31
Hope so. I'm not that certain. FoxNewsSucks May 2022 #39
Yea, FQX is ready to put their new "spin" on Benghazi any day now KS Toronado May 2022 #41
I agree they should be, FoxNewsSucks May 2022 #44
Don't believe they can use the "both sides" are doing it scenario KS Toronado May 2022 #47
Yep, I know I'll be watching it FoxNewsSucks May 2022 #49
My gut feeling tells me SilverDawg May 2022 #27
Maybe, but J6 hasn't gotten the attention it deserves & public hearings are weeks away themaguffin May 2022 #43
Lady G? BlackSkimmer May 2022 #29
Lindsey Graham I believe, or maybe Ginni Thomas Meadowoak May 2022 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author malaise May 2022 #36
The latter malaise May 2022 #37
Oops, I also thought it was Leningrad Lindsey FoxNewsSucks May 2022 #38
Yeah, I know who you meant. BlackSkimmer May 2022 #51
Ah, the good old "wink, wink" reference. BlackSkimmer May 2022 #45
Yup. Pure Repuke b.s. Diablo del sol May 2022 #30
Cheer up though. Republicans have picked a fight with women. Not a woman. Women. bucolic_frolic May 2022 #40
Indeed, they have picked a fight with Women. How will it go??? BADLY, I HOPE. n/t CaliforniaPeggy May 2022 #42
Righhhhht. BannonsLiver May 2022 #46
I'm betting on Ginni Thomas being the leaker. When the investigation is suddenly Vinca May 2022 #48
Yup but this one takes two malaise May 2022 #50

FalloutShelter

(11,879 posts)
2. I'm on the same wavelength.
Wed May 4, 2022, 08:07 AM
May 2022

They jin up more anger and victimhood in their base. They maybe trap Dems into an unforced error…(nukeing the filibuster) Roe is codified into law. The right goes absolutely apeshit while the left celebrates. We loose the midterms and then the right gets EVERYTHING! Filibuster free majority. Game, set, match.
(Spoiler… I’m a fiction writer so I am always looking for more motive)

MadameButterfly

(1,065 posts)
20. Roe is immensely popular
Wed May 4, 2022, 09:16 AM
May 2022

There isn't more than 30% support for making abortion illegal in ANY state. How would this help Republicans? Let's show the people that if you elect Dems they will actually do something that you want them to do.

But it's a no go because Manchin won't nuke the fillibuster for this, and people will blame Dems even though he really isn't one except when it comes to judges.

Texin

(2,597 posts)
33. There is actually less than 30% who support doing away with Roe v. Wade.
Wed May 4, 2022, 09:55 AM
May 2022

That's because when a so-called "pro lifer" has a girlfriend, daughter, wife or mistress fall pregnant, it becomes personal, especially if it's one of those people who are raped, been the victim of incest, have an ectopic pregnancy, or get pregnant at a "bad time". Then abortion is a necessary "convenience". And, of course, if a "pro life" woman finds herself in any of those situations, it is a personal choice of necessity.

MadameButterfly

(1,065 posts)
52. Yeah, people believe abortion is bad for other people, that's why men
Wed May 4, 2022, 05:33 PM
May 2022

should be banned from considering the issue altogether

underpants

(182,883 posts)
3. The immediate unified right wing speculation and spin is telling to me
Wed May 4, 2022, 08:12 AM
May 2022

It stinks of projection and could even be Putin related. Yes I know that’s speculative too.

As mentioned on Morning Joe - a spouse? Roberts trying to redirect in some way?

https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=16657096

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
4. I agree malaise
Wed May 4, 2022, 08:14 AM
May 2022

This probably won't be the only distraction scumbags like Graham, Lee and others use to keep the media occupied

Baitball Blogger

(46,758 posts)
6. The disproportion in attention is galling.
Wed May 4, 2022, 08:29 AM
May 2022

An unprecedented leaked memo vs. an unprecedented attack on the Capitol.

I say we add pressure to push our perception of what is important, because this one is very easy.

ancianita

(36,137 posts)
13. EXACTLY.
Wed May 4, 2022, 08:50 AM
May 2022

Throw in the suspect behavior (and bad romance) of one Clarence Thomas, and we've got cross-branch complicity in Jan 6.

Wednesdays

(17,412 posts)
16. That could be true, although within a few weeks
Wed May 4, 2022, 09:05 AM
May 2022

the SCOTUS brouhaha will subside, and people will tune in more to the J6 committee hearings.

jaxexpat

(6,849 posts)
28. Here're "a few more words".
Wed May 4, 2022, 09:36 AM
May 2022

The Supreme Court has been corrupted...since its inception as a body whose members are appointed by a single individual, for life, on the probability that they'd rule and uphold Dred Scott.

Evolve Dammit

(16,773 posts)
34. I knew it was corrupt when they stopped counting ballots in 2000. Silly me. The Boltons and Stones
Wed May 4, 2022, 10:06 AM
May 2022

bussed in from DC to bang on the glass. And your historical note sounds right.

 

867-5309.

(1,189 posts)
26. malaise, I admire your optimism
Wed May 4, 2022, 09:27 AM
May 2022

I wish I had more of it. I just don't think the hearings are going to change much.

KS Toronado

(17,329 posts)
31. The televised hearings are going to change everything
Wed May 4, 2022, 09:52 AM
May 2022

2 hearings a week right up to the midterms will paint IQ4.5 & reQublicOns as un-American,
and Americans will want revenge. Here's a half full glass for you.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
39. Hope so. I'm not that certain.
Wed May 4, 2022, 10:42 AM
May 2022

It will validate what we already know to be true, and maybe reveal that it's even worse than we thought.

But unless the average American sees it on all networks, so they can't switch over to Honey BooBoo or The Kardassians, it'll just be a blip in the newspaper. We're at the mercy of how exactly the corporate media will not only cover the hearings, but how they will present it and advertise it. If they don't treat it as the important event it should be, it will be quickly forgotten.

Of course, the MAGAt crowd won't know it happens at all, as the Fox "News" Sewer and Hate Radio will spend the time whining about Hunter Biden, tan suits, the mistreatment of MF45, and Clinton's emails.



KS Toronado

(17,329 posts)
41. Yea, FQX is ready to put their new "spin" on Benghazi any day now
Wed May 4, 2022, 11:13 AM
May 2022

Meanwhile, remember how much attention the televised hearings of Watergate & O J Simpson got?
Jan 6th hearings should be in the same ballpark or larger since it is a bigger deal.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
44. I agree they should be,
Wed May 4, 2022, 11:27 AM
May 2022

but OJ was a celebrity thing. And there were still complaints from people who were missing their soaps.

Watergate was back when the news media did their jobs. Had republicons gotten control of the radio and the Fox/OAN/NewsMax tv news earlier, that coverage would have been vastly different. I'm among those who think Nixon might have survived.

I think we'll be able to predict the outcome quickly. If the media presents it as "this was TREASON!!!! Pay attention!!", we're good. If they do the usual "both sides" or "some are saying", we're sunk. Same if they just put the hearing in an inset box while continuing regular programming.

MF45's impeachment hearings were televised, and I was so disappointed that it didn't change public opinion nearly as much as it should have. Either time. Probably shouldn't have been surprised though, all the rotten things exposed in the 2016 campaign didn't hurt the MFer.

KS Toronado

(17,329 posts)
47. Don't believe they can use the "both sides" are doing it scenario
Wed May 4, 2022, 11:49 AM
May 2022

this time around as it was all reQublicOns who attacked our Capitol. On the other hand it wouldn't
surprise me if FQX pulled out Antifa again. Time will tell I guess.

Response to Meadowoak (Reply #35)

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
38. Oops, I also thought it was Leningrad Lindsey
Wed May 4, 2022, 10:36 AM
May 2022

I haven't heard the vile criminal wife of the corrupt Clarence Thomas called that . Considering her traitorous self-serving behavior, she's not really much of a "Lady". Trash is more like it.

Vinca

(50,304 posts)
48. I'm betting on Ginni Thomas being the leaker. When the investigation is suddenly
Wed May 4, 2022, 11:49 AM
May 2022

dropped I'll know I'm right.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let me make this pellucid...