General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStaaaaahhhhhpppp! Please! Just stop!
Since the leak came out, we are being treated to a host of messages that amount to, "If we're going to take away women's right to determine what happens to their own bodies, we have to do X."
"If we're going to take away women's rights, we have to make the fathers pay."
"If we're going to take away women's rights, we should raise taxes so the state will financially support the mother as she raises the child."
"If we're going to take away women's rights, we have to hurt those who voted for it in their wallets!"
These "solutions" are everywhere. Memes, posts, comments from pundits and celebrities.
What ALL of these are saying is basically this: "OK. Go ahead and take away women's rights. But it'll cost you."
NO! JUST NO!
NONE OF THESE "solutions" supports women. All of them blithely allow for the enslavement of women. They are nonsense spews that encourage complacency in the face of an assault on the rights of the largest number of US citizens ever.
Please. Can we just kick this nonsense to the curb where it belongs.
The message is not, "If you're going to take away women's rights you have to do X."
The message is DO NOT TAKE AWAY WOMEN'S RIGHTS.
Freddie
(9,268 posts)No amount of $$$ can compensate for the physical risk of childbearing.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,641 posts)Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,641 posts)Novara
(5,844 posts)Look, people are frustrated. They're lashing out because they feel helpless to stop this.
You make a good point, but I am afraid we can't stop them. I think the best we can do is to elect more Democrats who will pass laws that treat women like they are equal human beings.
I agree that boycotts, protests, and any other cockamamie ideas currently floating around won't change what is happening. But we HAVE to make sure the Rs don't take the House and the Senate this fall because they won't stop with abortion. We have seen since 2016 there is no low too low for them. You can think of the most restrictive and crazy laws and you'd probably be right. See, it isn't enough that they take away our rights - they want us to suffer. The whole GQP has turned into a sadistic, fascist, hate-filled, revenge-seeking monster. The only way to make them stop is to take away their power, and that means electing more Democrats everywhere, including local races.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)"If we're going to take away women's rights" message is surrender.
And of course you are right. The only dependable solution is to elect Democrats.
Novara
(5,844 posts)And for that reason I hope people are out in the street every day all summer long like the George Floyd protests. There will be four months from the date the final decision will be made public and the mid-terms. I am hoping people stay engaged to keep this in the forefront of everyone's minds when they vote this November. We do need to keep the heat on. On ALL of the right wing.
But there is no "if." They ARE taking away our rights. And we need to stay good and angry and work like hell to strip THEM of power, because they clearly abuse it.
I don't plan on surrendering. I donated to NARAL (National Association to Repeal Abortion Laws) this morning. I'll do what I can.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)on plans for larger protests. I'll bring it here if BigmanPigman doesn't first. (She's always right on top of this stuff. )
Novara
(5,844 posts)Thrilled, actually! Bring it on, Womens March!
usonian
(9,816 posts)The best, the ONLY cure to WhiteChristianNationalism, race baiting, mysogyny, etc. is WINNING
https://democraticunderground.com/100216380145
Stand up and fight!
GOTV like your life and freedom depended on it.
wnylib
(21,497 posts)are participating in the refusal to purchase anything for this week, starting today and going on for the entire week through Saturday, the 14th?
The purpose is to draw attention to the issue and show the economic power of women.
How much attention is this getting on DU since the first thread that I read about it a couple days ago?
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)wnylib
(21,497 posts)on Saturday. I have enough of everything that I don't need to buy anything, not even food items, for a week. No other purchases online or in person until next Sunday.
But this will only work if there are enough focused doing it.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)social media, despite my own efforts. Even here, I got some absurd pushback and lukewarm reception on the plan.
But I'm still going to do it as I look for other efforts. The Women's March seems to be organizing something in DC next week. I live in NY and am not finding something here. If there's nothing here, I'll take the train down.
But it requires buying a ticket on the train!
wnylib
(21,497 posts)If you do find anything in NY, let me know.
XacerbatedDem
(511 posts)Plus, I am wearing a black armband when I go out to symbolize my sorrow at the way this country treats women.
wnylib
(21,497 posts)OMGWTF
(3,959 posts)spanone
(135,846 posts)SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)58Sunliner
(4,387 posts)ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)It sure sounds like that's what you're saying, to which I say, "Fuck that! I'm going to be too busy fighting to even think about giving up!"
Thanks but no thanks to this kind of defeatism. Wars are won by fighting, and this war is just getting started!
SoonerPride
(12,286 posts)I said civil disobedience wont stop the court from taking away our rights.
ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)When you strike down a suggestion that's on the table without offering an alternate suggestion, that implies there's nothing to be done. 🤷♀️
2Gingersnaps
(1,000 posts)didn't meet a timeline, it was extended twice, but we have met the 38 State threshold. We need to get ahold of our female representatives, our President and our Vice President, and our male allies and demand our equal rights under the law. An extension on the timeline to meet the threshold is really the only thing blocking the Equal Rights Amendment.
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/22/1086978928/50-years-ago-sex-equality-seemed-destined-for-the-constitution-what-happened
GoldandSilver
(186 posts)I do not consent. I will not consent. As long as I breathe, blocking a womans reproductive rights will not be accepted.
RESIST.
Beartracks
(12,816 posts)Local.
State.
Federal.
Vote Democratic.
Every ballot.
Every time.
==========
Solly Mack
(90,773 posts)edhopper
(33,590 posts)and it will be very difficult to stop them.
So I think the sentiment is in the face of that, we need to make them pay as dearly as they are forcing others.
I also don't think most of the people saying these things are serious, they are just expressing their heartfelt anger.
And I completely understand that. As should you, rather than berate them.
They say these things because they are rightfully angry, not because they think it will solve it or make it better or be a good trade off.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)Nor should you.
edhopper
(33,590 posts)have a good day.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)is to "make them pay as dearly as they are forcing others"?
As if paying child support is an equal burden to bearing and raising an unwanted child? That pretty well illustrates my point.
And I did not miss your point. I just don't agree with it.
COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)Then perhaps your point is not well made.
edhopper
(33,590 posts)and would not be the first time.
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)just another example of things I wonder about here from time to time.
Magoo48
(4,717 posts)COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)Cmon, man these are our fellow Americans whose rights Im willing to fight for, in the political sense. Arent you? It doesnt sound that way.
58Sunliner
(4,387 posts)Last edited Sun May 8, 2022, 08:25 PM - Edit history (1)
Women will die because they do not have the basic human right to medical care. People say those things because they really don't get the threats to women.
littlemissmartypants
(22,695 posts)Women who are already mothers are a substantial part of the cohort terminating pregnancies. That it's a basic right to health care is also dismissed in many conversations. We've become so easily manipulated as a society we can barely even think critically anymore.
❤
Novara
(5,844 posts)"We've become so easily manipulated as a society we can barely even think critically anymore."
58Sunliner
(4,387 posts)Narrow-minded people who are on the fence about abortion might never have considered the financial costs to society or to make the fathers pay for support.
OF COURSE we want to maintain women's rights!
ALL OPPOSING and possibilities should be communicated. To shut down any other options is narrow-minded itself.
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)I hate DU this month.
Fucking hate it.
2Gingersnaps
(1,000 posts)This is a "all hands on deck, all solutions needed" situation. Crapping on our allies is not constructive. Yes people are righteously angry, they should be. Yes, some are more than a little afraid, they should be. Some of us have been beating our heads against this brick wall all our lives. We are not neophytes.
I was not an unwanted child, I was the orphan of two people who wanted me very much. They did not fail me, the State of Ohio did after they died. That is what I mean by all solutions needed. No woman should be forced to bear a child. NO CHILD SHOULD BE ABANDONED OR UNWANTED. This is not about "valuing life," it is about the unconstrained pursuit of power, and who the law should and should not apply to.
I would remind Samuel Alito, when he is done quoting Sir Matthew Hale, "How you treat the least of my children, so you treat me." I think Jesus holds more sway than a witch burner.
lpbk2713
(42,760 posts)That is just not on the table.
housecat
(3,121 posts)politics, and other bullshit
BlueJac
(7,838 posts)Take away any human rights period. These people must be stopped .
bronxiteforever
(9,287 posts)Never never never never give in to those who will deny them.
uppityperson
(115,677 posts)Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)enneacanthus
(51 posts)LakeArenal
(28,823 posts)Case in point: DONALD J TRUMP
We cant even get them subpoenaed.
Just no repercussions. None.
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)So many Dem/lib/progressive fundraisers are treating this as a fundraising opportunity. I can't tell you how many emails I've received in the last 6 or 7 days and the message has been pretty much the same thing: "Oh no, they're going to overturn Roe! Don't let it happen! Donate HERE xxx because we're fighting for you!"
I'm getting really tired of these fundraising people who are telling me over and over that the ship is gonna sink unless I give them more money.
Response to FakeNoose (Reply #28)
Scrivener7 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)Yup, if they were really doing something, they would quit with the fundraising emails and take to the streets with us.
It reminds me of Letitia James emailing for money after she was elected Attorney General. Things have been stagnant with her Trump case (which she campaigned on), but here she was asking for money for her short-lived Governship run. Jeez Letitia, stick to the program and get Trump behind bars already!!!
calimary
(81,323 posts)I always wonder what theyre doing with the money they already have. Its always send more! And send another 6 dollars every month
. Never-ending! Its a freakin pile-on.
Makes me sorry I ever donated to anybody in the first place. All they did is spread my contact info around.
Some reward for an honest effort to be helpful.
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)... but that puts us on everybody's "sucker" list. And you know what that means.
calimary
(81,323 posts)I lost count of all the candidates for office from here (Oregon) to the East Coast. People I never heard of. Campaigns I never heard of. Please send money!!!
All its done is motivate me to close the purse strings. Im done.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)The more they beg, the more turned off I am. Start opening your mouth and fighting for things that are important to us, and then maybe I'll send you some money.
kiri
(794 posts)I say the same thing to the 5,000 environmental, wildlife, save the... outfits.
Everyone has a well-paid CEO/President. Everyone pays rent for a headquarters.
Everyone has for sure a well-paid marketing/fundraising firm. And tote bags.
Consolidate guys! At most one CEO per 10 states (5 in all). Two fund-raising mailings per year.
Novara
(5,844 posts)Give to abortion rights groups helping women obtain abortions, and give to Dems challenging Rs this Fall. We have to keep the House and we have to make Manchin and Sinema irrelevant so we can get some shit done during Biden's last two years of his first term.
Karma13612
(4,552 posts)I just attended my first rally, ever! In Potsdam NY.
Good turn out, couple dozen people on a nice sunny spring day. Plenty of great signs, and powerful speeches to get us fired up. And plenty of motorists honking and thumbs-uping their support. And the attendees ranged from young guys and gals to old farts like me, both men and women. So good to see this.
Felt so good to connect and share the outrage we are all feeling. One gentleman gave a very powerful speech whos message was, voting is no longer enuf. We need to take to the streets and show our disagreement with the loss of our rights.
One reporter (not sure who she was with) as well as Channel 7 news showed up and did interviews with filming as well.
I hope they have one this coming Saturday on the official Womens march day. Ill be there. Otherwise the closest one via Womens March is all the way in the Daks at Long Lake. Odd, because thats pretty remote. I would have hoped for Plattsburgh NY. Lots more visibility for sure.
Anyway, Im pumped up to FINALLY be involved!!! Im not a wedding planner organizer, but I certainly know how to hold up a sign and rally for a cause.
Woohoo!!!!!!
58Sunliner
(4,387 posts)TeamProg
(6,145 posts)Really?
Added: Narrow-minded people who are on the fence about abortion might never have considered the financial costs to society or to make the fathers pay for support.
OF COURSE we want to maintain women's rights!
ALL OPPOSING and possibilities should be communicated. To shut down any other options is narrow-minded itself.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)to explain that?
And what do they amount to other than, "I know! Let's make guys pay child support!" How's THAT working out right now? We already have those laws on the books. They do not "even the score" by any stretch of the imagination, and they are never enforced.
It's bullshit.
So yes. That's what I am saying.
TeamProg
(6,145 posts)financial costs to society or to make the fathers pay for support.
OF COURSE we want to maintain women's rights!
OPPOSING possibilities and negative outcomes should be communicated. To shut down verbalizing other outcomes is narrow-minded itself.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)you do not want to maintain women's rights.
"Other outcomes" involve the end of women's rights. They should be communicated and advocated if you want to end women's rights.
Call me narrow-minded all you like because I want women to be treated like humans. It's a narrow line.
TeamProg
(6,145 posts)Yes, we will fight it with all means available, including laying out all of the negative outcomes for men if their unwanted co-pregnancies aren't aborted.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)TeamProg
(6,145 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)They cause pregnancies.
And if you say narrow minded one more time I'm going to throw up.
(Some people who have a uterus and ovaries, are not on testosterone, and identify as men or not as women may have pregnancies. But it's CLEAR you are not talking about them)
TeamProg
(6,145 posts)narrow minded to people who dont understand the concept of figurative speech.
SCOTUS is now a bad joke, but many of the angry voices here are not expressing a way to a solution or possible outcomes, just a lot of hysteria.
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
ARE YOU KIDDING ME?
TeamProg
(6,145 posts)ROE VS WADE.
Reasonable voices are harder to tune out than the din of hysteria.
The pro-choice movement needs reasonable & thoughtful voices. Legal minds, preferably.
Kavanaugh, Gorsuch and Coney Barrett need to be charged with pergury, TODAY!
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)Fuck the use of hysteria. Go look up the historical meaning of that word. Then consider deleting if you want to actually have any ground to stand on here.
DLevine
(1,788 posts)Hysteria: Originally defined as a neurotic condition peculiar to women and thought to be caused by a dysfunction of the uterus.
TeamProg
(6,145 posts)DLevine
(1,788 posts)Why not choose a different word to make your point?
2Gingersnaps
(1,000 posts)YESTERDAY! When laws on the books are not upheld, like child support, or programs to support at risk mothers, the first people to feel that is the Mothers and Children. We have been fighting for women's equality since WWI. The Humane Society was founded to protect women, children, and animals. They were up against common law on women and children, but they succeeded with animals!!
Winning the vote did not win us equality, and even now many younger women have no idea how far we have actually come since the 70's and will not know until it is taken away, and this vote is step one of taking it away. This is truly a fight that goes back to FDR's New Deal, a vision of building toward a just and equitable society, that was waylaid by the neoconservative Christofascist movement that came to promise under Ronald Reagan. Not even Goldwater or Nixon were this cynical. DFG was JUST that cynical. He just said he was the best thing that every happened to any religion, for the love of God this has absolutely NOTHING to do with the teaching of Jesus. And we do have Separation of Church and State= but this ruling will effectively end that. And it is only the beginning.
The Equal Rights Amendment was passed by Congress fifty years ago, but it never made it to the Constitution because a deadline was set, 38 states had to ratify it, they did but they did not meet the deadline. Congress would have to remove the deadline to make Equal Rights for women in the Constitution. Every hear anyone talk about that?
https://www.npr.org/2022/03/22/1086978928/50-years-ago-sex-equality-seemed-destined-for-the-constitution-what-happened
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)TeamProg
(6,145 posts)How do you answer that?
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)men who are not in this to have a discussion. They are not able to.
They are either so stupid that they cannot grasp the issue at hand, so ridiculously narcissistic that they are unable to see this other than how this affects "men," meaning themselves, or they are simply trolls. In that case, their goal is to rub sand into the wound that women are feeling, to further insult and agitate us, and thereby score some kind of points for a contest that exists only in their heads. They just hate women and want to express that.
I have put these people on ignore. They aren't about to learn anything or listen to anyone. And you and I are certainly never going to learn anything from them.
Novara
(5,844 posts)There's no way to "make them pay" for that other than making sure they do not have the power to do this, and by electing people who will reverse this violation of human rights.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)Then we won't need abortions.
Sorry, I couldn't resist.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)DLevine
(1,788 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)littlemissmartypants
(22,695 posts)Another opinion that makes me livid is the "if you don't like abortion then don't have one" statement which is completely dismissive of the fact we're talking about health care, liberty, bodily autonomy and the overall impact on society. It flies in the face of the nuances and complexity of the entire issue. I just have no patience for such dismissive and imo, idiotic statements. ❤
bluboid
(560 posts)The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)Geneva Convention
We are a signing member.
MyMission
(1,850 posts)Before leaking the opinion, I saw how battles were being waged in too many states, and since then I've felt like I'm preparing for all out war. The thing is, war is waged on many fronts.
I understand and agree with your message. But if we think about Russia's invasion of Ukraine, massing at the border, denying plans to invade and invading, brutal war crimes when war hasn't even been declared, we need to prepare to counter this attack with whatever is available. Sometimes it's preparing for refugees, which Canada and blue states are preparing for.
In between this, in time for mother's day, the Taliban has imposed all women wear full burka.
Our sisters there are being subjugated as before. My heart breaks for them. The part of me that's a reactionary says we should all wear them in solidarity, but the conservative Christians might actually approve.
Sadly the anti-abortion fanatics have been planning the reversal for 50 years, and it looks like they are poised to succeed. It's the defining act that turns the battles we've been fighting into a full fledged war. It's not saying they won or will win, but they will fight hard and dirty and we must prepare ourselves to do the same. Whatever it takes, we will win.
DO NOT (DARE TRY TO) TAKE AWAY WOMEN'S RIGHTS...or else!
We must plan and prepare and send that message.
planetc
(7,819 posts)assertion that there IS a patriarchy. There fave been no male or female scholars or legal minds that have argued that there is no patriarchy, or the patriarchy is justified for these reasons, or made any substantive justification for the centuries-old subjugation of women by a patriarchy. Combine that with the unarguable fact that in this country, the right to rule at all stems from the consent of the governed. I think it is time, and past time, for women to assert their right to rule their own bodies. It will be difficult, perhaps impossible for the moment, but if there is no secular justification for sexist enslavement of women, women will not consent to any law that results in enforced child bearing. Women should make the argument that men can do all the jobs women now do for free and willingly if they attempt to use the power of the state to enforce pregnancy. Men can care for the infants, supervise the school children, teach them, care for their parents in old age, and just run this country without the help of women.
The argument is that the governmental institutions of a patriarchy do not have the right to enforce pregnancy on a woman's body. Period. For any reason. Women should not have to ask for forgiveness because they were raped, or their daughter is pregnant by her father, or the fetus is badly damaged. The state has no right to oversee or make judgments on her use of her body to have a baby, or to not have a baby.
I really would like to see this as an Amendment to the Constitution of this country. Just like the Amendment that men like to misunderstand as giving them the right to firearms because they want to own them. Pregnancy and motherhood are serious business, and it's time this and every country recognized the degree to which women hold societies together. Our government needs to recognize that, and Get. Out. of. the. Way.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)druidity33
(6,446 posts)planetc
(7,819 posts)Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)If you're going to kill elementary students with assault weapons, the gun companies have to pay for headstones.
If you're going to kill people at a gay night club, then hobby lobby has to sell rainbow ribbons.
There is no mediating this. You do not get to make your religion into law.
2Gingersnaps
(1,000 posts)you at least pay lip service to actually taking care of the lives that will be created, to not intentionally forcing a new life into despair as an extension of punishment to the mother, as is the custom of this country truth be told. We can pretend that we value life but we have proven every step of the way since we landed we don't practice what we preach. Pun intended.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)child support is a new and revolutionary concept. One that will strike fear into the hearts of men.
It isn't. It's a feeble consolation and rarely enforced as it is.
To use child support as a threat in this argument is pure bullshit. A useless pat on the head, an insulting attempt at appeasement.
Lip service is not OK.
It IS wrong to suggest that if you are going to strip half the population of its rights, you should reply to their objections with lip service.
IT IS!
2Gingersnaps
(1,000 posts)Not their PERSONAL FAILING NO ONE HAS TO GIVE A SHIT ABOUT, I know a red herring when I see one. These demands are empty threats, because there will be no follow through, there never has been. What is NOT empty is the number of children who will suffer for this. The number of women whose lives will be marginalized by this.
Talking about solutions should have happened a LONG DAMN TIME AGO. First and foremost equal human rights for half of this population. Real sex education, contraceptives, universal healthcare, an educational system accessible to all, a strong social safety net. In a civil society, we would be moving toward such goals not backtracking to the Middle Ages. We accepted the cost of doing nothing a long damn time ago, we are headed to Civil War because the minority is not accepting majority rule. And for the life of me, any society that accepts this as a status quo does not deserve to survive.
Thank you Mr. Franklin and Mr. Jefferson, flawed humans that you were, it was a beautiful dream, it was very ambitious, it was revolutionary in it's day-a Republic if you could keep it-and education so the beneficiaries would never let it go. Apparently that was too much to ask.
FelineOverlord
(3,580 posts)They take away OUR privacy, we take away THEIRS, I see that as TAKING ACTION.
brooklynite
(94,602 posts)If so, please share it. If not, its worth discussing what to do if it happens.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)be any kind of answer to this" stage.
The men who have never had and will never have a right taken from them seem to want to skip right over that "no" phase and go right to the "some bullshit appeasement" stage.
But really, thanks for your support.
ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)Those posts have been bugging the crap out of me, but I couldn't quite put my finger on exactly WHAT it was that bugged me about them. You just nailed it.
All the child support, free health care, free day care, and free anything else in the world does not make up for losing one's bodily autonomy or having a 50 year old constitutional right ripped away!
I wish there was a lot more help available for those who would prefer to have their babies if they could just afford it. That would be great. BUT it would solve nothing for those who simply DON'T WANT to have their bodies held hostage for 9 months and SHOULD NOT be forced to go through all the discomforts, inconveniences , and outright dangers of pregnancy and childbirth just to satisfy the dictates of someone else's religion.
Anyone who thinks "punishing men" would IN ANY WAY make up for denying women the right to control our own bodies really needs to rethink this whole thing.
Thanks for pointing out the gaping holes in this line of reasoning!
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)keep the child. So it is a lifetime paying for a choice you didn't make.
And they're offering child support. Which we already know men only pay if they feel like paying it.
This is showing me how even men who are our allies simply do not get what is going on here.
ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)It's the ones that don't that are the problem.
I think too many people, not just men, forget what carrying a pregnancy to term actually entails, especially the risks involved. We've become way too blasé, as a society, about those risks, and some people are in need of a reality check on that score.
Same thing with the psychological aspects of giving up a child for adoption. I've never wanted to punch someone in the face so badly as when Amy Coney Barrett said it shouldn't be a problem now that you can just drop a baby off at the nearest firehouse! Like "You don't have to raise it, so what's the big deal?"
It's true that money can be a big factor in some pregnant people's abortion decisions, but it is FAR from the only reason people decide to have abortions. The bottom line is that no one should be forced to stay pregnant and give birth against their will, regardless of any other factors. The bottom line, as I know you're well aware, is that women should always have a CHOICE.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)That attitude about adoption is vile.
My family was built through adoption. The children of my heart are adopted. But I know their birth mothers' stories. I know there is true heartbreak and terrible hardship there.
My adopted goddaughter is one of the strongest abortion supporters I know.
questionseverything
(9,656 posts)The repubs senators that knew about 1-6 should be arrested then democrats wont need as many votes
I have another 💡 but I cant publish it, perhaps you can guess?
czarjak
(11,278 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)They do face the reality of what's likely to happen in the near future. Screaming no is not going to change that.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I had an abortion pre-Roe. I have no desire to make anyone go through what I did. I am skeptical of keyboard warfare, though. I've seen no evidence it accomplishes anything.
I will be making calls to one or more states where we can win a Senate seat. That's how you deal with this problem, not by criticizing other DUers who are expressing their revenge fantasies. I would not have said anything critical of your OP had you not been venting against others here.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I guess I dont have a monopoly on grace
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)Okie dokie....
You have a lovely day, now.
Orrex
(63,216 posts)then people will find other ways to resist.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)innovation that will make people regret taking away women's rights.
It is not that.
Bettie
(16,111 posts)We can't go back. We won't go back.
I think of all those "personhood" laws and it makes me so angry to think that they would take away a woman's "personhood" while pregnant. What the fuck?