Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Mon May 9, 2022, 05:40 PM May 2022

Let me see if I have this right--- a statutory "buffer zone" around the perimeter of an

abortion clinic is unconstitutional as a violation of the protesters' 1st Amendment rights BUT---peaceful protesters outside the homes of "Justices" like Alito and Kavanaugh are terroristic hooligans who MUST be stopped.

Is that where we're at?

Is it maybe time to be loud and disruptive? Color outside the lines? Engage in mass civil disobedience? Call fascist misogynistic bastards what the are to their faces? Get arrested?

Someone we thought a lot of called that "good trouble", didn't he?

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
3. Democratic Senator Chris Coons recorgnizes problem and has answer. I sure hope he is not bashed.
Mon May 9, 2022, 06:06 PM
May 2022

"[Democratic Senator] Coons added in the release: “If the families of Supreme Court Justices have the same profile and exposure as the highest ranking officials in our government, they deserve the same level of protection. We must take threats that come from extremes on both sides of the political spectrum against Supreme Court Justices seriously, and that makes this bill an unfortunate necessity.”"

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/09/politics/supreme-court-justices-security-senate-vote/index.html


"“Millions of Americans who tuned into Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s confirmation hearing couldn’t miss seeing her husband and daughter on national TV,”said Senator Coons. “If the families of Supreme Court Justices have the same profile and exposure as the highest ranking officials in our government, they deserve the same level of protection. We must take threats that come from extremes on both sides of the political spectrum against Supreme Court Justices seriously, and that makes this bill an unfortunate necessity.”"

https://www.coons.senate.gov/news/press-releases/sens-coons-cornyn-introduce-bill-to-extend-security-and-protection-for-scotus-justices-and-families

wnylib

(21,467 posts)
10. Who is threatening the court members?
Mon May 9, 2022, 07:55 PM
May 2022

Since when are non violent protests a "threat" and not a first amendment right?

Bettie

(16,109 posts)
14. It hurts their delicate fee fees
Mon May 9, 2022, 08:26 PM
May 2022

and makes them sad because they figured that women would be happy to learn that they are no longer considered "persons" and that they will soon have fewer rights than a corpse.

It makes them happy, so they don't get why anyone would be upset.

Maybe they should just go fuck themselves, because Christine Blasey Ford had to move out of her home because of death threats from the supporters of these very same assholes.

Response to Atticus (Original post)

keithbvadu2

(36,809 posts)
7. Add a rider that abortion clinics get the same security.
Mon May 9, 2022, 07:14 PM
May 2022

Add a rider that abortion clinics get the same security.

Peregrine Took

(7,413 posts)
9. They put thier pants on one leg at a time like the rest of us.....don't they???
Mon May 9, 2022, 07:28 PM
May 2022

I.e. they are not one iota better than any of us. Actually, some of them aren't worthy to lick our boots.

Warpy

(111,266 posts)
13. Power tries to protect itself first, foremost, and always
Mon May 9, 2022, 08:21 PM
May 2022

so don't tell me you were surprised that a man who perjured himself to get a job he's unqualified for would want anyone who calls him on it to go to jail.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Let me see if I have this...