Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFlorida Faces First Amendment, Contract, and Budget Issues in Dissolving Disney District
This lawsuit will be fun to watch
Link to tweet
https://reason.com/2022/04/27/florida-faces-first-amendment-contract-and-budget-issues-in-dissolving-disney-district/
Florida faces all sorts of obstacles in its bid to strip Disney World of its self-governing status. Disney's Florida theme parks have long enjoyed the status of a special purpose district, allowed to operate as its own city. Since 1967, this special purpose districtknown as the Reedy Creek Improvement Districtmeant that The Walt Disney Co. had governmental control over the lands in and around its Florida theme parks, an area now encompassing around 25,000 acres. When the district was created, "the land was little more than uninhabited pasture and swamp," notes CNN. "With the special purpose district, Disney took over responsibility for providing municipal services like power, water, roads and fire protectionbut were also freed from dealing with legal red tape or paying taxes for services that benefited the broader public.",,,,,
"If Disney can prove that that's what happenedthat there was a retaliation against Disney by the state of Florida, who sought to take away a benefit that the government had previously gave to Disneythat might set for a retaliation claim under the first amendment," First Amendment lawyer Lawrence Walters told WESH 2 Florida......
Florida's dissolution of the district also runs up against contractual concerns. "There's a much more basic reason [than the First Amendment] Florida can't dissolve Reedy Creekit promised bond purchasers that it wouldn't," notes Florida attorney Jacob Schumer at Bloomberg Tax:
If Florida wants to end Disney's special status, the counties where Reedy Creek is located (Orange and Osceola) could inherit Reedy Creek's over $1 billion in bond debt and it will also violate contractual obligations to bondholders, Schumer writes. Besides, "both the U.S. and Florida constitutions place strict limitations on the government's ability to impair its own contracts."
"If Disney can prove that that's what happenedthat there was a retaliation against Disney by the state of Florida, who sought to take away a benefit that the government had previously gave to Disneythat might set for a retaliation claim under the first amendment," First Amendment lawyer Lawrence Walters told WESH 2 Florida......
Florida's dissolution of the district also runs up against contractual concerns. "There's a much more basic reason [than the First Amendment] Florida can't dissolve Reedy Creekit promised bond purchasers that it wouldn't," notes Florida attorney Jacob Schumer at Bloomberg Tax:
Reedy Creek, like other special districts, can borrow money by issuing bonds, which can then be purchased by investors looking for fixed payments. Just like any other debt, the terms of the bond are based on the specific bond contract at issue. Reedy Creek is authorized to issue a few different kinds of bonds, but the most important ones are those that promise to pay from the property taxes collected by the district and those that pay from utility system revenue.
Reedy Creek's bond offerings very much rely on the district's unique powers. Its property-tax-based bonds discuss that the district can tax up to 30 mills and promise to tax at a rate high enough to pay the bonds. Its utility revenue bonds discuss the district's various powers to generate utility revenue and promises to fix fees and charges sufficient to generate sufficient revenue to pay the bonds.
In authorizing Reedy Creek to issue bonds, the Florida legislature included a remarkable statementincluded in Reedy Creek's bond offeringsregarding its own promise to bondholders: "The State of Florida pledges to the holders of any bonds issued under this Act that it will not limit or alter the rights of the District to own, acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, maintain, operate or furnish the projects or to levy and collect the taxes, assessments, rentals, rates, fees, tolls, fares and other charges provided for herein until all such bonds together with interest thereon, and all costs and expenses in connection with any action or proceeding by or on behalf of such holders, are fully met and discharged."
If Florida wants to end Disney's special status, the counties where Reedy Creek is located (Orange and Osceola) could inherit Reedy Creek's over $1 billion in bond debt and it will also violate contractual obligations to bondholders, Schumer writes. Besides, "both the U.S. and Florida constitutions place strict limitations on the government's ability to impair its own contracts."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 660 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Florida Faces First Amendment, Contract, and Budget Issues in Dissolving Disney District (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
May 2022
OP
If the 2 billion dollar tax bill causes bankruptcies of Florida citizen's then so be.
ZonkerHarris
May 2022
#1
ZonkerHarris
(24,232 posts)1. If the 2 billion dollar tax bill causes bankruptcies of Florida citizen's then so be.
obamanut2012
(26,083 posts)2. Why is that okay? Especially since those two counties are blue?
Especially Orange?
XanaDUer2
(10,696 posts)5. Right nt
Demsrule86
(68,607 posts)3. No, that is not how it works.
Tickle
(2,527 posts)4. I still stand by my prediction
Well see at the next shareholders meeting
ZonkerHarris
(24,232 posts)6. what's the prediction?
Tickle
(2,527 posts)7. The ceo resigns at the next
shareholders meeting. Geoff Morrell, just resigned after 3 months. He helped the CEO craft the response to dont say gay bill
ZonkerHarris
(24,232 posts)8. Haha not gonna happen