Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Mon May 16, 2022, 06:20 PM May 2022

Was Humpty a SCOTUS Justice when the 2nd Amendment was "reinterpreted" in HELLER?

---from "Through the Looking Glass" by Lewis Carroll:

"When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’

’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’

’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all.”

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

EX500rider

(10,866 posts)
1. Wasn't so much reinterpreted as reaffirmed
Mon May 16, 2022, 07:36 PM
May 2022

Unless you can point me to a time anywhere/anytime in the US where you were required to be in a militia to own firearms?

Surely the original authors knew what they meant, did they start enforcing you to be in a militia after it passed?

The fact that is in the "Bill of Rights" ought to be a big clue that it is a individual right.

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
2. That's satire, right? If not, it's perhaps the most ridiculously disingenuous post I've seen
Mon May 16, 2022, 07:41 PM
May 2022

on this board or elsewhere.

EX500rider

(10,866 posts)
3. In other words you can't point to any time militia membership was required for firearm ownership
Mon May 16, 2022, 07:43 PM
May 2022

Meaning it was always a individual right...as are all the 1st 10 amendments.

The Bill of Rights is the first 10 Amendments to the Constitution. It spells out Americans' rights in relation to their government. It guarantees civil rights and liberties to the individual—like freedom of speech, press, and religion.

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
4. Exactly who in this thread mentioned anyone at any time "requiring" a person to belong to a militia
Mon May 16, 2022, 07:54 PM
May 2022

in order to own a firearm? I understand that you'd rather discuss that than the plain meaning of the Second Amendment: for the purpose of possibly being called to serve in a "well regulated militia", yes, INDIVIDUALS may bear arms.

Have a good one.

EX500rider

(10,866 posts)
5. Well then I don't see what you meant
Mon May 16, 2022, 09:34 PM
May 2022

When you said they reinterpreted the second amendment if it's always been an individual right which it has

EX500rider

(10,866 posts)
8. I don't think anyone thinks its free from restriction
Mon May 16, 2022, 10:04 PM
May 2022

There are and always have been many firearm restrictions and laws.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Was Humpty a SCOTUS Justi...