In a Post-Roe America, Expect More Births in a Country Where Maternal Mortality Continues to Rise

[niyad]

In a Post-Roe America, Expect More Births in a Country Where Maternal Mortality Continues to Rise
5/16/2022 by Robin Fields and Adriana Gallardo


**********The United States has the HIGHEST maternal mortality rate among wealthy countries. And it may get worse as abortions become more difficult to obtain, say public health experts.********


An abortion rights demonstrator gathers near the Washington Monument during a nationwide rally in support of abortion rights in Washington, D.C. on May 14, 2022. (Probal Rashid / LightRocket via Getty Images)



If the U.S. Supreme Court does as its leaked draft opinion says and strikes down Roe v. Wade, researchers expect that in the following year, roughly 75,000 people who want, but can’t get, abortions will give birth instead. They’ll do so in a country where pregnancy and childbirth continue to become more dangerous. Government data released this year shows that U.S. maternal deaths increased significantly in the first year of the pandemic, going from 754 in 2019 to 861 in 2020—a 14 percent jump. The death rate for Black women was almost three times higher than that for white women.

The stats for 2020 were no surprise. As ProPublica detailed in 2017, the U.S. has fallen behind other wealthy nations and many less affluent ones where deaths linked to pregnancy and childbirth have plummeted over the past two decades. Deaths are only one yardstick for measuring maternal health. For every U.S. woman who dies as a result of pregnancy or childbirth, up to 70 suffer dangerous and sometimes life-threatening complications.

The landscape for maternal health post-Roe would change swiftly, and not for the better, many public health officials and experts say. Some 25 states would likely move to ban abortion, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights. A brief submitted in the case on which the court is ruling, signed by about 550 public-health and reproductive-health researchers, draws a straight line between lack of abortion access and increased risk of maternal death. “Put simply,” the brief says, “women living in states with the most restrictive abortion policies—and thus the least abortion access—were found to be more likely to die while pregnant or shortly thereafter than women living in states with less restrictive abortion policies, regardless of state-to-state differences in poverty, race/ethnicity, and education.”

Middlebury College economics professor Caitlin Knowles Myers, whose work focuses the effects of limits on abortion access, said her research shows that in the year after the ruling, about 100,000 women seeking abortions won’t be able to get them from providers. Some may be able to obtain pills for self-managed abortions, but about three-quarters will give birth. Those women are likely to be disproportionately poor, young, of color and concentrated in the Deep South, parts of the Midwest and some Western states, often in places where social safety nets are weakest, she said. “Overwhelmingly, it is the poorest and most vulnerable women who are the most affected.”


. . .

https://msmagazine.com/2022/05/16/roe-v-wade-forced-births-maternal-mortality/

[LetMyPeopleVote]

1. The SCOTUS is going to kill a good number of American women

Link to tweet

[niyad]

2. I think that they are looking forward to our deaths.

[smirkymonkey]

4. They are.

The cruelty is the point.

I believe that punishing women who have recreational sex and control over their own lives and destinies is their primary goal.

They could give a damn about "the bay-bees".

[roamer65]

3. If this happens, it will be the largest population shift in American history.

I expect legal states to be majority female and the banned states to be majority male in 10 years.

[niyad]

5. Wait til the red states forbid women traveling!

[roamer65]

6. Borders are too porous right now for them to stop it.

Since most of these states that will ban abortion are southern states, we really need to start to compile lists of known anti-choicers in these ban states.

The goal should then be to deny them entry northward when climate change gets ugly.

Why?

Because they have help to make climate change worse through overpopulation and should be punished for it.