Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DBoon

(22,366 posts)
Thu May 26, 2022, 01:01 PM May 2022

LAT: Texas forces companies to be neutral on guns or lose business

To keep doing business with Texas, companies will in effect have to take a vow of neutrality if the latest school-shooting massacre sets off another nationwide furor over gun control.

That’s because in June 2021, flanked by Republican lawmakers and officials from the National Rifle Assn., Gov. Greg Abbott signed a state law that gives firearm makers, retailers and industry groups a special protection, one that relies on language usually reserved to shield people from racism, sexism, ageism or other forms of prejudice.

As a result, companies signing contracts with government agencies there — including school districts, cities and Texas itself — must verify they don’t “discriminate” against the industry, seeking to force them to ignore any calls to cut their business ties.

The unusual provision, which has since inspired legislation in other Republican-led states, shows how much power the gun lobby has wielded in the nation’s statehouses to fend off any efforts to curtail access to firearms in the wake of mass shootings. The latest occurred Tuesday at an elementary school in Uvalde, Texas, where a gunman killed 19 students and two teachers in the deadliest school shooting since the massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Connecticut a decade ago.


https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2022-05-25/texas-forces-companies-to-be-neutral-on-guns-or-lose-business
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
LAT: Texas forces companies to be neutral on guns or lose business (Original Post) DBoon May 2022 OP
How is that enforceable? Novara May 2022 #1
Not sure but I remember this... IrishAfricanAmerican May 2022 #3
I remember that too Novara May 2022 #4
Can't have people hurting the gun's feelings or making the gun feel uncomfortable. Solly Mack May 2022 #2
Lie. Girard442 May 2022 #5
so, if i own a strip mall in texas that has a daycare center, a children's gymnastic place, unblock May 2022 #6
yes, you can refuse to rent to them DBoon May 2022 #7
State tells business what they can say. Huh... Claire Oh Nette May 2022 #8

IrishAfricanAmerican

(3,816 posts)
3. Not sure but I remember this...
Thu May 26, 2022, 01:13 PM
May 2022

"in December 1997 Oprah Winfrey, the American talk show host, and Howard Lyman, a former cattle rancher and then director of the Humane Society's Eating with a Conscience Campaign, were sued in federal district court in Texas on a charge of disparaging beef."

Texas is a whacky place.


Novara

(5,843 posts)
4. I remember that too
Thu May 26, 2022, 01:19 PM
May 2022

Texas is insane. We can't allow one insane state setting legal precedent for the rest of the country. They've already done it with the abortion vigilante law.

unblock

(52,245 posts)
6. so, if i own a strip mall in texas that has a daycare center, a children's gymnastic place,
Thu May 26, 2022, 01:21 PM
May 2022

and a video game arcade, and there's one vacancy, and a merchant applies who wants to sell massively overpowered child-killing machines, i can't refuse to rent to them?

even if it costs me all my other business as those tenants quickly need to move out as their business is ruined when parents refuse to let their kids near my mall?

DBoon

(22,366 posts)
7. yes, you can refuse to rent to them
Thu May 26, 2022, 01:25 PM
May 2022

but you will be disqualified from contracting with the State of Texas

Claire Oh Nette

(2,636 posts)
8. State tells business what they can say. Huh...
Thu May 26, 2022, 05:29 PM
May 2022

Isn't that a violation of the corporation's first amendment rights?


Or are rights so totally 20th century??

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»LAT: Texas forces compani...