Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Pithiest Critique of Modern Conservatism Keeps Getting Credited to the Wrong Man
Wilhoits Law was created by a different Frank Wilhoit.
https://slate.com/business/2022/06/wilhoits-law-conservatives-frank-wilhoit.html
Stop me if youve heard this one before: Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect. That linewritten by Frank Wilhoithas become a popular aphorism to sum up the hypocrisy and moral bankruptcy of the modern Republican Party.
Link to tweet
Whos Frank Wilhoit? Many people who cite the quote assume it comes from Francis Frank Wilhoit, an American political scientist whose 1973 book The Politics of Massive Resistance chronicled Southern segregationists efforts to resist Civil Rightsera court rulings.
Link to tweet
That would make a whole lot of sense. But in fact its the work of another Frank Wilhoit, this one not a professional scholar of American politics but a 63-year-old classical music composer in Ohio, who wrote the adage as part of a longer point in the comments section of the political science blog Crooked Timber. Since then, it has taken on a life of its own, recirculating on Twitter or Reddit every few months, most recently in reference to certain Free Speech Defenders aggressive posture on libel and defamation laws. A handful of sleuths have cracked the case beforeFrancis Wilhoit died in 2010; Frank Wilhoit posted his remark in 2018but the confusion lingers, for obvious reasons.
Link to tweet
This week, I reached out to Wilhoit the younger to discuss the long half-life of his observation. He explained what he thinks of conservatism, which piece of his music he likes most, and why he cant stand this case of mistaken identity.
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 2208 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Pithiest Critique of Modern Conservatism Keeps Getting Credited to the Wrong Man (Original Post)
Celerity
Jun 2022
OP
Kid Berwyn
(14,908 posts)1. Excellent definition and story!
I also like the observation from John Kenneth Galbraith:
The modern conservative is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.
Thank you for a most informative OP, Celerity!
empedocles
(15,751 posts)3. Vintage Galbraith
Caliman73
(11,738 posts)2. You can also understand Conservatism from this lens, and it explains much of their behavior.
The foundations of Conservatism were solidified in defense of monarchy during the French Revolution. The idea that human societies are based "naturally" on a hierarchy of betters and lessers with the betters having the "god given" right to rule and the lessers serving dutifully. As long as you are not on the lowest tier of the pyramid, you can look down on someone and not feel low.
ret5hd
(20,493 posts)4. Excellent excellent story!
What an intelligent and erudite person and spot-on!
canetoad
(17,167 posts)5. Yep, that's pretty pithy
And it really pithes me off.