General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill of Rights, (including 2nd Amendment...) 1791. I don't think founders of U.S.A. would have
written 2nd Amendment if they knew what was going to happen 200 years later.
....I think those founders had any idea that guns would be so easy to get by so many people. If they had
known, they would have worded it differently. Yes, the founders were very intelligent, and they
had no idea what could happen. (At least that is my opinion
Walleye
(31,028 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Soft lead bullets are now a war crime.
yagotme
(2,919 posts)A semi auto weapon had been invented, also. Members of the militia had to provide their rifle, ammo, bayonet, etc, for drills. If one had money, one could also buy a cannon.
Walleye
(31,028 posts)yagotme
(2,919 posts)Black powder, just takes $. Modern, you have to apply for a Form 4 from the ATF (Destructive device), pay the tax, wait the several month long period, and upon approval, you can take possession of it. The ammo would also be taxed/permitted, which would make it a very expensive hobby, as you would burn a couple thousand dollars each time you pulled the lanyard, but it IS feasible. 1934 Firearms Act.
Walleye
(31,028 posts)We used to make gunpowder when we were kids. Until my cousin burnt his eyebrows off and we were forbidden. Always somebody to screw things up, right?
yagotme
(2,919 posts)But, if you have an enclosed vehicle, (Suburban, Explorer, etc.) you could rig a mount for your cannon in the back, and carry it concealed that way...
Walleye
(31,028 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Could you imagine how restrictive the constitution would have been? Perhaps their foresight in trusting future generations was well placed.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)If you Google abortion in 18th century America
You should be able to find a free version of this article.
yagotme
(2,919 posts)Rifle, bayonet, ammo, etc.
Stuart G
(38,434 posts)yagotme
(2,919 posts)but volunteers, militia, etc, worked at local policing during that time frame.
gladium et scutum
(808 posts)civilian made weapons did not have the capability to take a bayonet. Only military manufactured weapons had a bayonet lug.
yagotme
(2,919 posts)"The bayonets were of various makes and manufactures, reflecting the armys hodgepodge state. More than two years into the war, George Washingtons army was still cobbled together, a mishmash of militias who supplied their own materials and weapons. The bayonets also show evidence of modificationsomeone had tried to fit them to muskets they werent intended for. (At the time, bayonets and muskets were designed to go together, so a British bayonet would not fit a French musket.)"
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)I try to keep it simple: they surely did not intend on protecting the "rights" of the human shitstains in Buffalo or the Texas school. Most pro-gun people understand that, and are far more likely to support efforts to keep those humans from accessing guns, than to debate if Amendment 2 is valid.
Tree Lady
(11,474 posts)The only weapon they had that killed mass people when it was written was the canon and it was for military only.
Zero reason regular folks should have any automatic weapons.
You know things are going on in country when me and my two adult daughters during our weekly video call (they are early 40's and not into talking politics at all) spent almost half a hour talking about guns and what should be done. They both have kids.
yagotme
(2,919 posts)1: Cannon could be, and were, purchased by private citizens. This changed in 1934, requiring permitting/tax for modern cannon. Black powder muzzle loading cannon exempt.
2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Puckle_gun
The Puckle gun (also known as the defence gun) was a small crew-served, manually-operated flintlock[1] revolver patented in 1718 by James Puckle (16671724), a British inventor, lawyer and writer. It was one of the earliest weapons to be referred to as a "machine gun", being called such in a 1722 shipping manifest,[2] though its operation does not match the modern use of the term. It was never used during any combat operation or war.
The Puckle gun is a tripod-mounted, single-barreled flintlock weapon fitted with a manually operated[5] revolving cylinder; Puckle advertised its main application as an anti-boarding gun for use on ships. The barrel was 3 feet (0.91 m) long with a bore of 1.25 inches (32 mm). The cylinder held 6 to 11 shots depending on configuration, and was hand-loaded with powder and shot while detached from the weapon.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)doc03
(35,346 posts)hunter
(38,317 posts)We forgive them for that because they didn't know any better.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)Who didnt think women or poor people or anyone who wasnt a white guy who owned land should vote, that only elected members of state legislatures should pick US Senators.
I saw this meme thingy on Twitter that said something to the effect;
Maybe a document written by men who didnt have indoor plumbing and who would be amazed at the sight of a dishwasher shouldnt be held as sacrosanct in perpetuity.
doc03
(35,346 posts)have to reload 20 times. I guess in Uvalde he could have while the cops hid in the hall for 78 minutes.
A HERETIC I AM
(24,370 posts)Is because it is so true!
What an absolutely catastrophic clusterfuck that was. But youre right. If the guy was even slightly knowledgeable on a muzzle loader, he had all the time in the world to shoot 5 times as many, didnt he?
The Uvalde Police Department should be disbanded and reformed, with all new, properly trained personnel that reflect the population of the city.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Read up on King Philips War as a good example. They embraced violence with guns so I doubt they were that concerned.