General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEastman not getting a pardon is very telling.
We all know Trump loves pardons. However they are not fool proof. You have to document what the pardon is for. The person getting the pardon may lose his right to the 5th. Under the law, if you receive a pardon you are admitting guilt. All the people taking the 5th most likely did not get a pardon. That would include Eastman and Rudy.
I was wrong about secret pardons. It is possible Trump gave his family some type of broad secret pardon. I don't know if they would hold up in court. Fucking crazy shit.
Yesterday, Trump was once again offering future pardons to people, in an attempt to get them to keep their mouths shut. Will it work, I don't know.
Trump loves pardons, but they are not FOOL proof.
no_hypocrisy
(46,115 posts)Will Pardons be legally enforceable if the President gave them to further a criminal act that he was himself committing?
Tetrachloride
(7,846 posts)if pardons are enforceable.
EndlessWire
(6,531 posts)fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,170 posts)Wouldn't pardon of a future crime make both sides of the pardon an accomplice - part of a conspiracy?
Pardons should not be for friends and family.
gab13by13
(21,348 posts)that has not been followed for decades. We need to get back to issuing pardons how they were intended.
You would think that Democrats would lead the way for this. I have heard Jamie Raskin speak out on this.
The only pardons that I see anyone challenging are blanket pocket pardons, if they are out there.
tanyev
(42,559 posts)Donny didn't get what he wanted, so no pardon for Eastman.
sop
(10,187 posts)He's a loser.
mucifer
(23,545 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,107 posts)They take advantage of every loophole, every law, custom and norm to get off the hook for their crime spree.
gulliver
(13,181 posts)Which, of course, he did.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,617 posts)Numerous other sources confirming this.
Secret presidential pardons are not a thing.
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)People don't get pardoned for crimes they did not commit. Ari did a piece on his show last night about this. The Supreme Court has ruled on this.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,617 posts)In 1915, the Supreme Court wrote in Burdick v. United States that a pardon carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it. Over the years, many have come to see a necessary relationship between a pardon and guilt. Ford carried the Burdick quote in his wallet, defending the Nixon pardon by noting that it established Nixons guilt. More recently, MSNBC host Ari Melber taunted Arpaio by saying he had admitted he was guilty when he accepted Trumps pardon.
But Burdick was about a different issue: the ability to turn down a pardon. The language about imputing and confessing guilt was just an aside what lawyers call dicta. The court meant that, as a practical matter, because pardons make people look guilty, a recipient might not want to accept one. But pardons have no formal, legal effect of declaring guilt.
And more:
https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ex-soldiers-acceptance-trump-pardon-didnt-constitute-confession-guilt-court-2021-09-23/
Straw Man
(6,624 posts)... be like a tree falling in the forest?
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)But it is possible to give pardons and not announce it. I looked it up.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,617 posts)Including examples of when/how secret presidential pardons have been used.