Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 07:30 AM Jun 2022

Eastman not getting a pardon is very telling.

We all know Trump loves pardons. However they are not fool proof. You have to document what the pardon is for. The person getting the pardon may lose his right to the 5th. Under the law, if you receive a pardon you are admitting guilt. All the people taking the 5th most likely did not get a pardon. That would include Eastman and Rudy.

I was wrong about secret pardons. It is possible Trump gave his family some type of broad secret pardon. I don't know if they would hold up in court. Fucking crazy shit.

Yesterday, Trump was once again offering future pardons to people, in an attempt to get them to keep their mouths shut. Will it work, I don't know.

Trump loves pardons, but they are not FOOL proof.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eastman not getting a pardon is very telling. (Original Post) fightforfreedom Jun 2022 OP
Ignorance asking: no_hypocrisy Jun 2022 #1
Its up to Congress, the Supreme Court, The View and Chuck Todd Tetrachloride Jun 2022 #2
LOL! n/t EndlessWire Jun 2022 #6
Good question, I don't know. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #3
Foreknowledge of a crime, and accomplices bucolic_frolic Jun 2022 #4
There is a procedure for pardons gab13by13 Jun 2022 #5
Plus, Eastman failed. tanyev Jun 2022 #7
Trump the Pardon Nazi: "No pardon for you!" sop Jun 2022 #9
Exactly! 2naSalit Jun 2022 #10
The pardons will be tied up in court for years while the criminals leave the USA IMO mucifer Jun 2022 #8
The GOP will use every trick in the book to evade responsibility for their crimes. Irish_Dem Jun 2022 #11
Pardoning Eastman would make it look like Trump committed a crime gulliver Jun 2022 #12
It is a myth that accepting a pardon means admitting guilt. Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #13
Not so. If you are being pardoned for a crime, you are saying you committed the crime. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #15
The SCOTUS ruling was very narrow, for one case. Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #17
Wouldn't a secret pardon ... Straw Man Jun 2022 #14
That's what I thought. I thought it was crazy. fightforfreedom Jun 2022 #16
Post a link Fiendish Thingy Jun 2022 #18

no_hypocrisy

(46,115 posts)
1. Ignorance asking:
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 07:32 AM
Jun 2022

Will Pardons be legally enforceable if the President gave them to further a criminal act that he was himself committing?

bucolic_frolic

(43,170 posts)
4. Foreknowledge of a crime, and accomplices
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 07:51 AM
Jun 2022
It's like a phalanx of mob criminals armed with blanket pardons.

Wouldn't pardon of a future crime make both sides of the pardon an accomplice - part of a conspiracy?

Pardons should not be for friends and family.

gab13by13

(21,348 posts)
5. There is a procedure for pardons
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 07:52 AM
Jun 2022

that has not been followed for decades. We need to get back to issuing pardons how they were intended.

You would think that Democrats would lead the way for this. I have heard Jamie Raskin speak out on this.

The only pardons that I see anyone challenging are blanket pocket pardons, if they are out there.

Irish_Dem

(47,107 posts)
11. The GOP will use every trick in the book to evade responsibility for their crimes.
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 10:29 AM
Jun 2022

They take advantage of every loophole, every law, custom and norm to get off the hook for their crime spree.

 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
15. Not so. If you are being pardoned for a crime, you are saying you committed the crime.
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 11:17 AM
Jun 2022

People don't get pardoned for crimes they did not commit. Ari did a piece on his show last night about this. The Supreme Court has ruled on this.

Fiendish Thingy

(15,617 posts)
17. The SCOTUS ruling was very narrow, for one case.
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 11:57 AM
Jun 2022

From WaPo:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/five-myths/five-myths-about-presidential-pardons/2018/06/06/18447f84-69ba-11e8-bf8c-f9ed2e672adf_story.html

Pardons are only for guilty people; accepting one is an admission of guilt.

In 1915, the Supreme Court wrote in Burdick v. United States that a pardon “carries an imputation of guilt; acceptance a confession of it.” Over the years, many have come to see a necessary relationship between a pardon and guilt. Ford carried the Burdick quote in his wallet, defending the Nixon pardon by noting that it established Nixon’s guilt. More recently, MSNBC host Ari Melber taunted Arpaio by saying he had admitted he was guilty when he accepted Trump’s pardon.

But Burdick was about a different issue: the ability to turn down a pardon. The language about imputing and confessing guilt was just an aside — what lawyers call dicta. The court meant that, as a practical matter, because pardons make people look guilty, a recipient might not want to accept one. But pardons have no formal, legal effect of declaring guilt.


And more:

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/ex-soldiers-acceptance-trump-pardon-didnt-constitute-confession-guilt-court-2021-09-23/




 

fightforfreedom

(4,913 posts)
16. That's what I thought. I thought it was crazy.
Sat Jun 18, 2022, 11:20 AM
Jun 2022

But it is possible to give pardons and not announce it. I looked it up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Eastman not getting a par...