General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI don't suppose they can be prosecuted for perjury?
For lying about respecting precedent?
They can claim they evolved their thinking...
arthritisR_US
(7,288 posts)Polybius
(15,440 posts)None specifically said that they wouldn't.
MerryHolidays
(7,715 posts)I don't think there is any doubt that the "investigation" in 2018 was a complete hoax.
Next up would be Clarence and his wife's completely questionable involvement in the 2020 Presidential election.
However, these are longshots.
Response to iemanja (Original post)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
onenote
(42,715 posts)There is no basis for charging them with perjury. Their statements were carefully crafted.
Response to onenote (Reply #7)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
Irish_Dem
(47,139 posts)The power elite usually doesn't have consequences for wrong doing.
onenote
(42,715 posts)They never said that they would not overturn Roe. They never said that precedents can never be overturned.
iemanja
(53,035 posts)that Roe was settled law? Or did beer boy just say that to Collins?
FBaggins
(26,748 posts)Every Supreme Court justice going back decades has voted to overturn some precedent. That doesnt mean that they were lying if they said that they respected the concept.
The argument is understandable but misguided. We all knew that they were appointed with this decision in mind
and almost every Republican who vented for them did so expecting this to happen and almost every Democrat who voted against them said that they were doing so because they knew this would happen.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,340 posts)iemanja
(53,035 posts)I thought they had mentioned Roe. Others here didn't.