General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAs a married woman living in TX, I will no longer be having sex
As I am not open to having any more children, the risk is too great.
My husband can kiss my ass
mnhtnbb
(31,395 posts)to a state which recognizes the bodily autonomy of women.
evemac
(132 posts)But that's what I've been thinking for a long time.
Women no longer have to have sex with men. We can find sexual pleasure other ways, and now we can even reproduce without the act itself. If we want to have a child, we can go to a sperm bank.
samnsara
(17,623 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,209 posts)iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)hit list.
Just madness.
====
Welcome to DU.
Colbert
(46 posts)... though I don't think Clarence will have any issues with Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) - though it falls under the equal protection clause
iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)Thomas doesn't think he's Black/African American, so overturning Loving won't apply to him and Insurrectionist Ginny.
Celerity
(43,420 posts)process and right to privacy constructs, but rather the equal protection clause.
iluvtennis
(19,863 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,693 posts)samnsara
(17,623 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)I can't speak for women, of course, and I know one of the pro-life arguments is "well then just don't have sex" - so a sex strike might seem to be playing to this. But it'd be hilarious if women just shut down the candy store altogether. You caught the car, Rover, what you gonna do with it now?
calimary
(81,323 posts)But how many women could we recruit to go along with it?
Jilly_in_VA
(9,983 posts)set in Chicago. Called "CHI-RAQ", it is an updated version. It's available on Amazon Prime and I urge y'all to watch it. Very well done.
ChazInAz
(2,570 posts)Worked on two productions of it: at the height of Vietnam and the unmitigated lunacy of Itaq/Afghanistan.
It never grows old.
Traildogbob
(8,760 posts)Men are very rapie. So keep your AR Loaded. They are legal.
rainin
(3,011 posts)walkingman
(7,630 posts)Funtatlaguy
(10,879 posts)both House and Senate, sex resumes.
rainin
(3,011 posts)Dave says
(4,618 posts)The decision yesterday says the Constitution does not protect a woman's right to bodily autonomy and privacy. That does not mean there can't be a federal law that guarantees a right to abortion. So winning more Senate and House seats is a positive step forward toward re-establishing these rights in the laws of the land.
Alternately, states can establish these rights, but given the abundance of right-wing controlled Republican states, more than half will outlaw abortions (13 had trigger laws that went into effect yesterday).
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)result that women need to be safe.
spooky3
(34,460 posts)Codifying abortion rights. Currently they have too few votes.
COL Mustard
(5,906 posts)Keys to the kingdom, if enough people are truly angry enough to get out and vote in November.
Wednesdays
(17,383 posts)Using the same arguments. Only a Constitutional Amendment can seal reproductive rights.
Texin
(2,596 posts)Even if they have to fuck a corpse. This is going to start happening nationwide. You just hide and watch. There won't be any consequence for men who do this. People will just tssk tssk about it when juries deliver not guilty rulings after men are arrested, indicted and prosecuted for muder/rape.
ariadne0614
(1,730 posts)The abject terror of unwanted pregnancy + outrage over losing bodily autonomy will certainly kill the joy. Im outraged on behalf of everyone of childbearing age, and grateful that those days are far behind me. It will be interesting to see how men respond to the unresponsive.
Tadpole Raisin
(972 posts)there is no rape in marriage. I am sure they would reference another witches should be killed jurist from the 1600s, write the ruling in flowery language and give the remote possibility of other options for the women (which when brought to the SC they would disallow anyway).
Women are chattel to them.
IbogaProject
(2,816 posts)A citation Alito used from the 17th century was the same guy who created the marital exception to rape. The law in NY that had that exception until recently.
Texin
(2,596 posts)vasectomy conference as I type this. Women who've had a child or children can still legally tell her doctor she wants a tubal ligation (it's very difficult for a young women to obtain this procedure because practitioners are reluctant to perform them because they fear a woman will later change her mind, but they'd better let a woman decide and quit infantilizing them as if they're 10). If one's doctor refuses, if it were me, I'd be shopping around for a new one. And, seriously, if a man who has had a child or children refuses to have a vasectomy - which can be (usually) reversed - a woman probably needs to consider the viability of the relationship she has with her husband/partner. I know I would. I would rather spend the rest of my life alone and celibate than with someone so selfish and cowardly that he would refuse to have a simple in-office doctor's procedure as opposed to a woman's need for a more invasive surgical procedure.
Freddie
(9,268 posts)onethatcares
(16,173 posts)I've wondered for years why you folks haven't been cutting men off for their attitudes for years.
My thoughts: If men got pregnant there'd be an abortion clinic on every street corner next to a bar and firearm store.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)No way would he be in favor of this crap. There are plenty of women on the wrong side of this issue and plenty of men on the right side.
Now, if he was going to vote for a republican, he could sleep on the couch.
BonnieJW
(2,266 posts)my husband and his family were staunch repubs.
After being married for several years and having 3 daughters, my husband joined me in being an independent. I asked him about it and he said, "No man can love a woman and his daughters and be a republican."
I really miss that man.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)He voted for Reagan the first time. Later became an independent. He died a Democrat and at least as liberal as me. I could have trusted him to fill out my ballot.
csziggy
(34,136 posts)He'd have to find somewhere else to live and learn to live on his Social Security check.
Fortunately, I don't have to worry about that - he is very liberal and has never voted for anything other than Democratic candidates. He's made me more liberal.
walkingman
(7,630 posts)the backwards ass state. I completely understand where you are coming from but the ultimate answer is to change the minds of these digesting humans that think they have the right to tell others how to live and women could have a major role in doing so.
But come on....sex is good for you and don't destroy that degree on intimacy in your relationship.
cags
(1,914 posts)hay rick
(7,625 posts)calimary
(81,323 posts)Dayum! Is that a hay rick original?
Superb!
emulatorloo
(44,133 posts)nini
(16,672 posts)uh...
NOPE!
AllyCat
(16,193 posts)I dont think she needs a man to splain it to her. The rest of us dont either.
orleans
(34,061 posts)BlueAJ
(15 posts)She is taking action to protect herself from an unwanted pregnancy.
Start thinking about her and not your own needs.
Ms. Toad
(34,076 posts)It is about no longer being willing to risk the decades long risk of an accidental pregnancy. That risk exists, whether her husband is one of the guys guys or one of the bad ones.
walkingman
(7,630 posts)surprise me. I know in the old days BC was expensive and my insurance wouldn't cover it for decades. These fundamentalists and religious zealots simply don't care about women - of course that is not a secret.
whopis01
(3,514 posts)The idea that women should be willing to have sex so that men are not punished is incredibly misogynistic.
She even gave her reason as not wanting to risk getting pregnant.
Once again, it is her body, her right. Even if that is falling out of favor with so many people recently.
walkingman
(7,630 posts)Last edited Sun Jun 26, 2022, 11:19 AM - Edit history (1)
if not it just seems so mean. How about a compromise.....more oral sex and start a abortion vacation fund - after all the states that allow abortion are some of the most desireable in nation.
I can see it now. Miss a period and we're on vacation in California.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)It's time to be mean.
And if a woman chooses this, and her partner calls himself supportive, he needs to understand if she doesn't want to be an appliance controlled by the state.
Otherwise, his support is just lip service that goes only as far as his inconvenience.
Scrivener7
(50,956 posts)Whether her partner is a good guy or not, it is still dangerous.
halfulglas
(1,654 posts)The big things and the little things tell you that your decisions aren't your own. They look at the statistics that more women die from childbirth than having abortions and agree but they don't feel it deep down. If someone like Serena Williams can come as close as she did to losing her life post partum - healthy, rich, smart - it can happen to anyone. People don't listen to you because you're a woman. And it's going to get a lot worse. Decisions are going to be questioned at every turn. Did you do something to cause this? In vitro? That's going to be the next thing to go. Lysistrata anyone?
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)cags
(1,914 posts)hay rick
(7,625 posts)Did that stop you from getting vaxxed and boosted?
rainin
(3,011 posts)If she want to avoid an unwanted pregnancy, she should do everything in her power to prevent it. That, unfortunately, means no sex. We know that the only way to 100% avoid a pregnancy is abstinence. Sperm is off limits.
hay rick
(7,625 posts)My point is that our options in any decision in our life almost never come with a 100% guarantee, so that's not a reasonable standard. Other entries in the thread (husband is a Trumper...) create a stronger argument for her abstinence in marriage.
rainin
(3,011 posts)resort...abortion. If the new calculation is that you could get pregnant, but you probably won't, and pregnancy is simply NOT an option, you see how the risk assessment will leave some women no choice, but to abstain. Even a small risk can be too great, when the consequence is severe.
Disaffected
(4,557 posts)he gets them snipped. That's gotta be pretty close to 100%. If still in doubt use other measures as well(?).
Note: Am not trying to make any other points here.
CanonRay
(14,105 posts)Ilsa
(61,695 posts)It's pretty difficult to convince a rapist to wear a condom.
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)Women can "pack 'em" too!
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,359 posts)Buckeyeblue
(5,499 posts)At planned parenthood. It was $350. After a weekend on the couch with ice packs and beer, I was perfectly fine. And my wife didn't have to undergo major surgery. I don't know why more guys don't do this.
ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)It took TWO extra unplanned kids to convince my backward ass, (now ex) brother in law to get himself snipped. At least he did finally do it.
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)My wife & I have found intimacy to be much more enjoyable when there are no worries about unintended consequences.
I was happy to do it for her, so she would never have to worry about getting pregnant. To me, it was a gift I gave to someone I love.
Botany
(70,521 posts)But can't that lead to sex? Just asking.
Model35mech
(1,545 posts)At least when done correctly, according to my bosses friend's 2nd cousin once removed.
LOL
emulatorloo
(44,133 posts)samnsara
(17,623 posts)Colbert
(46 posts)You won't get ALL the women. While a majority of women are pro choice, there's a substantial minority who are not. Look at the polling regarding the recent Texas abortion ban, for instance:
39% support the law. Surprising, n'est pas?
OnlinePoker
(5,722 posts)That's a lot of people that support the ban (the number for men supporting it is about 7.8 million).
https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/TX/SEX255220#SEX255220
Colbert
(46 posts)Kind of gives you a sense of the struggle to come, doesn't it? The makeup of the court probably isn't going to change for the next 20 or 30 years. And they've pushed the resolution of this particular issue down to the states. The article I referenced shows the battlefield in Texas:
So, if you're in a blue state, you probably don't have much to be worried about. But if you're in a state like Texas or Wyoming, you might want to consider a move to someplace more consistent with your values.
Keep an eye on progressive Austin to see how many people vote with their feet.
shelshaw
(533 posts)rainin
(3,011 posts)Men should be responsible, too. Is that asking too much?
Guess I should have used the sarcasm emoji in my previous post...
my bad
rainin
(3,011 posts)I withdraw my sharp reply.
oldsoftie
(12,558 posts)So I had such a LOW bar to get over I look like a superhero! And after several years its just like the first one.
IronLionZion
(45,462 posts)along with dangerous home abortions. Gas prices are too high for many people to drive to their nearest blue state.
Condom and other contraceptives exist. Their sales should increase after this ruling. And vasectomies.
Oppaloopa
(867 posts)NickB79
(19,253 posts)I'm not trying to be snarky; I'm serious. A lack of intimacy in a marriage is a serious stress test, and reversing Roe is a process that will take years.
I see a lot of marital strife in the future, across the entire nation.
Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)If I didn't sign up for a sexless marriage, and it unilaterally became one, ok. I respect your decision and autonomy, but I'm out.
It wouldn't even be a question.
Although, just reading through, sounds like there are a whole ton of other issues bubbling around in that stew, so . . .
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)Would you expect you wife to risk her life.
No sex is that good.
Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)For me, in a committed, long term partnership, sex has to be on the table.
If it is not, I will find someone who makes me happier and is compatible with my preferences in a relationship. You should find someone who is compatible with your choices.
When it comes to something like marriage, sex is a very foundational and basic choice in the relationship. If two people do not agree on it, the relationship ain't gonna be great.
If the other partner is fine with no sex, great. Enjoy the partnership.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)Complications from pregnancy is real.
Now if women cannot be treated for miscarriage or other medical issues that is asking a lot.
Death.
I think of women will be making some decisions.
Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)But no one is owed a relationship if they don't like the terms.
It's best that people find others who are compatible with their choices.
avebury
(10,952 posts)to protect your wife from pregnancy?
Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)If I were in a heterosexual relationship where neither of us wanted kids, we'd be peas and carrots. I've never wanted children.
If I did want kids someday and the other person did not, it probably wouldn't be a great idea to get married to that person.
mentalsolstice
(4,461 posts)Im married to my best friend. I absolutely adore him, and enjoy his company. Sex is one way to enjoy our relationship, but it ranks down the list of other ways we love being together! Sorry you feel the way you do, and sympathy to your partner or potential partners.
ETA: not that my post adds to the abortion debate. Were wholeheartedly pro-choice and weve both benefited from being able to access safe and legal abortion.
Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)No one needs sympathy. Everyone makes their choices. Respecting those choices would be nice.
I always think about how people expound endlessly on freedom of choice (in all things), and then immediately engage in the nasal slalom as soon as someone makes choices they don't like.
"People are free to do what they like and have the lives they like. But if they're not doing it the way I'd have them, they're assholes."
You're also holding up an incident that isn't in part of this conversation. A sudden disability isn't the same as making a choice. If someone can't have sex, that alters the conversation that needs to happen. If someone suddenly chooses not to, when the understanding was that sex was on the table, that's a different conversation. The would be a re-evaluation for me.
This is all assuming, of course, we're discussing monogamy. When couples can't have sex, there are often accommodations made for one or both partners. But intentionally choosing to withhold sex without a hall pass? I'd be out. That's making a choice for the other partner. That's attempting to impose your choice on them. It's a shitty play, and it's the sense I got from the original post.
And we shouldn't be in that business. We're the people who are supposed to like agency.
mentalsolstice
(4,461 posts)Did the OP understand that sex was a primary requirement in her relationship? That it would be a weapon. I dont know, did she know her husband was anti-abortion when they married. Its not my place to judge without knowing more facts. There are a lot of disgusting posts in this thread....sex is an entitlement.
Yes, there are substitutes for sex if for some reason a partner is unable....as long as they agree to it. However, it should be negotiated. To just say Im out is unfair.
As for the OP, shes stated shes done with having children, yet her husband is anti-abortion. I dont know other aspects off their relationship and why they have stayed together thus far. Myself, I was friends with my husband for several months before we became romantically involved. So at that time we knew we had similar beliefs. And I chose him because we connected on so many levels, first and foremost. I knew I would enjoy his companionship no matter what life brought us....health, age, disability. Sex was a benefit, but it wasnt a primary thing in our marriage.
Midwestern Democrat
(806 posts)divorce or openly have extra-marital affairs.
Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)"Women don't owe men sex." And this is absolutely 100% correct and true. Irrefutably. Autonomy, choice, and consent are the bedrock of any romantic relationship.
Here's Part 2.
Men don't owe women a relationship.
If the agreed upon terms and understandings are broken, either partner has the right to walk away. I'd even go as far as to say they have the obligation. Two people in a miserable relationship have a way of making everyone else around them miserable. Particularly the children.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)My Grandmother almost died after the second child .
No birth control back then.
They slept in separate beds.
No idea what my grandfather did after that.
But he died a month after my grandmother died.
They died in their 90's.
Cracklin Charlie
(12,904 posts)Alito can go back to the 13th century for his opinion. Well go to Ancient Greece for the solution!
3catwoman3
(24,007 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Hopefully your husband shares your degree of, if not exact, reaction, as is actually usually the case with couples. (That darling pair, Clarence and Ginni, comes to mind).
My married daughter and DIL will continue using contraception and making themselves and their husbands happy -- I'm sure. I don't have to ask.
Btw, presumably it doesn't make a difference in your situation, but AG Merrick Garland says the states cannot ban FDA-approved abortion pills and that the DoJ will do everything it can legally to protect women's rights under this new reality. Over half of abortions were already by pill (only over half?!), and beyond doubt that percentage is going to shoot up.
Response to cags (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Russian assets in our govt absolutely must go...to prison for life (at minimum)!
Response to SheltieLover (Reply #88)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)The only difference is that now, the terrorists hold judicial, congressional, & other govt offices!
Response to SheltieLover (Reply #148)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)to get a vasectomy or you could get a tubal ligation-if you can find a dr. to do that now.
emulatorloo
(44,133 posts)that helps keep marriages alive IMHO.
On Edit: Ah just saw he is a Trumper. If so, divorce might be a really good option.
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #35)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
emulatorloo
(44,133 posts)I agree trust and friendship are the basis of good relationships. Intimacy helps keep those things alive. Sexless marriages can destroy both partners.
That being said I would never get involved w a Trumper.
Jedi Guy
(3,194 posts)I've had some experience with that and I concur it can put a significant amount of stress on the relationship. My wife had endometriosis in her early 20s and ended up having a double oophorectomy. She was receiving HRT when we first met and so had a normal libido that sometimes went into overdrive (not that I minded).
A few years after we got married, she decided to stop taking the hormones and her libido essentially vanished, seemingly overnight, resulting in a 7-year drought. Of course, without a sex drive intercourse can be very painful for a woman, so I never pushed the issue and certainly didn't make demands or throw down the gauntlet. Nevertheless, it was tough because a significant piece of our relationship was gone. She felt bad about it and accepted that I might seek fulfillment elsewhere, and she wouldn't have blamed me if I'd done so, but I never did.
Happily for both of us, she found a competent OB/GYN who helped her get back on the HRT and tweaked it appropriately, so things are back to normal now.
Response to emulatorloo (Reply #69)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
TeamProg
(6,146 posts)mcar
(42,334 posts)Texin
(2,596 posts)If your spouse and other women's spouses divorce as a result, they're likely not going to be finding a whole slew of women - old or younger - willing to blithely spread their legs from now on without a ring, a wedding date and the pastor, officiator or priest at the ready. Of course, the men can just go full on psychopathic pirate, because the laws don't apply to them any longer.
The days of "casual sex" can be seen from one's rearview window henceforth.
I too live in Texas. Back when I was 45 and unmarried at the time to the man I'd later marry, I fell pregnant for the first time in my life after having several serious long term partners previously. I had an abortion because we'd discussed children and decided that we'd not be having them, primarily because my now husband is 12 years older than I am, and he had two adolescent boys (ages 11 and 12), and he didn't want to raise another one, and I was always ambivalent about having a kid of my own so WE made the choice to end the pregnancy. I don't regret it. And I never did. I feared at the age of 45 my own health would be at risk, and since I wasn't actually married at that time, I had no guarantees that the father would be in my life in the future. And since I was well into middle age, I felt a pregnancy would endanger my job in a very competitive firm. There was no way I would have been able to raise any child alone and/or jobless. Now every young girl, young woman or mature woman in Texas no longer has a choice. We've essentially become service animals. Chattel property.
Fuck those goddamned justices, fuck Abbott and all the rest of those legislators right out of the Handmaids' Tale to hell. May they burn eternally.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)know when they have gone too far. Did these idiots not
realize this affects every single woman in this country?
I think there are a lot of married women who would just as soon not have sex. They just seem to put up with it.
Now they have the perfect excuse to just quit.
That could be a pretty big group.
Response to cags (Original post)
Post removed
rainin
(3,011 posts)if a pregnancy is unwanted. Birth control pills were sufficient because women knew they had a failsafe. The game has changed.
Texin
(2,596 posts)We're about to see a whole landslide slew of paternity cases clogging up the courts from now on out.
Lars39
(26,109 posts)Some get a real startled look, like theyve never thought about that aspect of the situation.
rainin
(3,011 posts)OMGWTF
(3,960 posts)She told him that they are coming for our contraceptives. She was right.
rainin
(3,011 posts)AllaN01Bear
(18,268 posts)Texin
(2,596 posts)and have no consequence. It punishes a woman for sex whether she participated willingly or through force.
love_katz
(2,581 posts)As you stated further down in the thread, he voted for this. The people on this thread who are arguing with you need to think about what that really means. 🤔 If I was in her shoes, I would make the same decision. Men are NOT entitled to sex from women, no matter how much they might believe that they are! And that goes double with brass knobs on it for any man who is arrogant enough to vote in favor of this horrible fanatical religious crap of ownership of women's bodies. And, I am beyond appalled at the lack of support and empathy for her decision. Do I need to say it again in all caps? MEN ARE NOT ENTITLED TO WOMEN'S Just AND THAT INCLUDES SEX! Just wow, that anyone would need to have that pointed out on a progressive message board.
Beachnutt
(7,325 posts)Maine Abu El Banat
(3,479 posts)Good for you. My wife and I were just discussing Investment in marital aids. We think the market will be booming.
jaxexpat
(6,837 posts)Don't even ask.
oldsoftie
(12,558 posts)I know people who aren't even FROM Texas but after living there a few years even they got that way. "oh, Texas this Texas that". No you're no different than the rest of us! And Alaska is bigger......
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)I'm a man, I take responsibility for my own sperm.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)will be having sex.
paleotn
(17,931 posts)A lot of men in Jebusland are going to be cut off. Serves them right.
In Jebusland, there tend to be two types of men: those who have been saved by Jebus, and those who have not. The men who have been saved by Jebus tend to be married to women who have been saved by Jebus - and those women are over-represented among the 39% of women who are anti-abortion (or at least supported the Texas abort ban). So I suspect if men are going to be cut off, it'll be the non-Jebus-saved ones that suffer that fate.
sarisataka
(18,673 posts)You are in a healthy relationship. Best of luck to you.
lefthandedskyhook
(964 posts)Perhaps people like you can help to do so metaphorically when the US birth rate drops. Of course, facts do matter and this one would be big
Emile
(22,791 posts)leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)sex. If something goes wrong with your pregnancy you are up shit creek. This affects married women maybe more than single women. Just having sex is dangerous.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)Death if complications happen.
Men could go somewhere for sex if needed.
Just think if BC becomes illegal.
How many men want large families.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)pregnancy could mean curtains for both the woman and the baby.
Am I wrong? Wasn't it not too long ago that Catholic hospitals saved the baby first and the woman second? Do they still do that?
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)My aunt moved her to another hospital.
Even then she almost died.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,869 posts)Catholic Hospital for maternity stuff.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)This was a D/C for miscarriage.
My Aunt saved my mothers life.
Texaswitchy
(2,962 posts)Last edited Sat Jun 25, 2022, 07:17 PM - Edit history (2)
The hospital I was born at.
BlueAJ
(15 posts)Interesting that it seems like many in this thread seem to suggest her choice is unreasonable and are offering ideas that would let the man have what he wants.
Seems like a woman's choice is shaky even among some who are "pro-choice".
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)And his choice if he wants to stay with her. Fair deal all around.
housecat
(3,121 posts)did I want a tubal ligation. We were about to fliip a coin when he asked if I ever wanted to get pregnant again. I said absolutely not, and then asked if he would want another child. He said no, but at least he would still have a choice. I got the ligation. We've been married for 51 years and glad we made that decision.
birdographer
(1,331 posts)I never got pregnant but knew in my early 20's that I would never want children. My husband is the most indecisive person on the planet and had no opinion about whether he wanted kids or not. So it was a no-brainer to me that I would be the one to have the surgery (ligation)--no matter what, I never would want kids. We have been married 50 years and I have never regretted that, never had so much as a passing thought about parenthood. We were living in Canada at the time, I think it cost $25. No flak about it from the doctor.
housecat
(3,121 posts)llmart
(15,540 posts)Have sex with yourself. It's safer.
Colbert
(46 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)Is her husband.
Response to cags (Original post)
BusterMove This message was self-deleted by its author.
TBF
(32,068 posts)I am married & in Texas as well. When I was younger there was a medical issue (clotting) and I could no longer take birth control. My ob-gyn suggested vasectomy as the safest alternative so that's what we did. Talk to your doctors & they will give you recommendations for who is good in the area. Take care (and yes I share your anger as well)
anamnua
(1,114 posts)In the long run we cant risk being outbred by the Rethugs
Blecht
(3,803 posts)Response to cags (Original post)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
Marcuse
(7,488 posts)roamer65
(36,745 posts)diane in sf
(3,914 posts)out to friends or dopey teens or others who lack impulse control.
Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)hatsoffforu
(1 post)Raine
(30,540 posts)so why not continue with that.
Eliot Rosewater
(31,112 posts)Shut it down, completely.
Hahn_Bikey
(54 posts)With all the discussion about contraceptives on this thread it makes you think about how this male dominated society even spends most efforts on so many ways on contraception for women rather than men. Hopefully this issue may help change that. Groups like malecontraceptive.org are trying their best but they have an uphill battle
herding cats
(19,565 posts)Honestly, I'd probably have sought out a divorce attorney before now, but I know everyone deals with things differently.
I support your choice and respect your right to make it.
BrightKnight
(3,567 posts)Sexual inactivity is already at record high levels among young men. IDK, apparently women are hooking up with older Chads.
Jspur
(578 posts)but since you have implied in an earlier post in this thread that your husband is a republican then I can't say I feel bad for him. I will say this you do risk your marriage ending if you don't give him sex but that's your choice but just don't' be surprised if he goes out and cheats on you. That's what a lot of men do when they can't get sex.
Vinca
(50,279 posts)body-control laws understand a woman doesn't need a man for sexual gratification. Time to invest in sex toys.
Kaleva
(36,312 posts)I doubt a sex strike will work.
VGNonly
(7,495 posts)Beat it.