The hearing tomorrow; Just a guess, the witness could be someone who turned to save their ass.

[fightforfreedom]

It is inevitable that someone is eventually going to turn. We know the Garland investigations have intensified. There is no telling who they have been questioning. All the people involved in the coup have been watching the hearings and they know they are in deep shit.

Someone is going to turn to save themselves. Will that someone appear tomorrow? We will find out.

[agingdem]

1. hoping it's Pat Cipolione...

now that would be a "get"!

[rsdsharp]

3. I am, too, but I think it may be Navarro.

He’s shitting bricks over the contempt charges. If it is Navarro, I hope they have him on video, in case he decided to lurch off into “Green Bay Sweep” land.

[agingdem]

7. Navarro is a loose cannon..

and the J6 knows what he knows...the guy spilled his guts twice on Ari Melber's show...this surprise hearing has to be someone with gravitas like Cipolione or Alex Holder

[SoCalDavidS]

5. Someone On Joy Reid's Show Just Said His Sources Say It's Not Cipolione nt

[agingdem]

8. so no Cipolione

how about Alex Holder?..you can bet he's getting threats if tight security is in play

[Stinky The Clown]

4. If one were to turn to save one's ass, would it not be to DOJ and not the J6 committee?

[RockRaven]

6. I think it is very unlikely that there is a surprise witness trying to save themselves.

Anyone who needs to save themselves would be making a deal with the entity capable of holding them accountable -- the DOJ.

If the DOJ is seeking cooperation from someone, they would want that person's testimony under oath to be in settings controlled by the prosecution, not an entirely different branch of government. Any testimony under oath in front of Congress now which doesn't match their later testimony as a prosecution witness undermines their usefulness, and jeopardizes the cases. The DOJ would very much prefer any critical witnesses not put their usefulness at risk. If one were seeking the DOJ's future good graces, testifying in front of Congress now would be a bad idea. Also, one would need a non-prosecution agreement in place before giving any testimony with any degree of self-incrimination anyway.

[fightforfreedom]

9. You may be right, We will find out tomorrow.

[Mr. Ected]

10. I wonder how much the floor would rattle if Mark Meadows came clean

THAT would be some MUST-SEE TV.

[WiVoter]

11. I'm Cautious About Getting My Hopes Up, BUT

For some reason, I am cautiously optimistic here. My guess is Pence will be the one tomorrow.

[rubbersole]

13. To quote a Stephanie Miller Show producer...

"He's up to his albino eyebrows in this."

[WiVoter]

15. Yup

It’s what I’m thinking

[Tree Lady]

12. Well it's a great tactic to get everyone

To tune in tomorrow. Not say who witness is and the internet goes crazy.

[Takket]

14. must be something big. they wouldn't go through all the trouble of rushing into another hearing

for someone small potatoes.