Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:04 PM Jun 2022

The J6 Committee Already Deposed Engel

Last edited Wed Jun 29, 2022, 08:46 PM - Edit history (3)

People... please.

For presentation purposes the Committee had Hutchinson as the sole witness today, because (a) she saw a lot and (b) she recently hired new lawyers and got out from under Trump's lawyers.

For convenience they did ask her about things she was told by others.

THIS IS NOT A TRIAL.

Yes, if it is a trial, you want those percipient witnesses.

No, for the purpose of the hearing today, it is fine to ask her what those witnesses told her. Again, the J6 committee already has testimony from Engel and Ornato.

Now, as for the RW nonsense being posted here. Neither Engel nor Ornato has denies what she said. Some idiot on twitter has a "source" that says someone would contradict her.

Yeah, a "source". My bet is that his source is John Barron.

June 8, 2022

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/08/trump-raised-jan-6-capitol-appearance-secret-service-agent-select-panel-00038217

Engel told Jan. 6 select committee investigators that the two men discussed Trump’s desire to go to the Capitol and took different views on the topic. Engel noted that they went back to the White House instead of heading to Capitol Hill. The contents of Engel’s testimony have not been previously reported. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi declined to comment.


Finally, understand what that says. If Trump is a passenger in the vehicle and has a “different view on the topic” of where to go, you have to forget everything you know about Trump to think it was some rational exchange of opinions.

28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The J6 Committee Already Deposed Engel (Original Post) Effete Snob Jun 2022 OP
Kick and Rec emulatorloo Jun 2022 #1
Don't know if the Daily Mail is a right wing rag, gab13by13 Jun 2022 #2
JESUS LORD - READ IT! Effete Snob Jun 2022 #4
My exact same thought ! jeeze ! cloudboy07 Jun 2022 #27
The Daily Mail is, in fact, a right-wing tabloid, Ocelot II Jun 2022 #5
Nothing in The Daily Mail is to be taken at face value. It has been a RW propaganda rag since it was Ford_Prefect Jun 2022 #19
Thank you! We are ALL just trying to make sense Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #20
. Effete Snob Jun 2022 #22
Thank you kcr Jun 2022 #3
Just curious... Why do you describe any kind of questioning or Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #21
Bullshit Effete Snob Jun 2022 #23
Agree with your assessment to a point...think about the 2 SS loyal to a fault to tfg..they asiliveandbreathe Jun 2022 #6
If they were so loyal they were willing to lie to the committee kcr Jun 2022 #7
It probably never came up...seriously..unless it was a subject of questioning..and if they were asiliveandbreathe Jun 2022 #9
The committee stands by her testimony kcr Jun 2022 #10
Okay then...so someone is just blowing smoke...who broke the story...P Alexanderr..or Daily Mail..or asiliveandbreathe Jun 2022 #11
It's a tweet - a fucking tweet about an "anonymous source" Effete Snob Jun 2022 #13
It sure did send some sparks flying... asiliveandbreathe Jun 2022 #14
A lot of us are probably on edge Effete Snob Jun 2022 #15
It's only Tuesday..... asiliveandbreathe Jun 2022 #16
Oh, good golly... Effete Snob Jun 2022 #17
K&R, MAGA distraction on hearsay is tell tale to how much today hurt uponit7771 Jun 2022 #8
It's Barron with 2 r's (n/t) PJMcK Jun 2022 #12
Ha! Love it. Joinfortmill Jun 2022 #18
I wouldn't trust Engel even if he denied Trump ever assaulted him. SunSeeker Jun 2022 #24
Agree. So what do you think the J6 committee was trying Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #25
Because she is a credible witness who was in the WH with Trump during the Capitol attack. SunSeeker Jun 2022 #26
Sure do hope so!!!! I don't know anything about her. But Laura PourMeADrink Jun 2022 #28

gab13by13

(21,360 posts)
2. Don't know if the Daily Mail is a right wing rag,
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:14 PM
Jun 2022

but it is saying the 2 agents will contradict the testimony.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10963183/Secret-Service-prepared-testify-oath-Trump-did-NOT-grab-steering-wheel.html

Engel and Ornato are really close pals with Trump. Wasn't Engel or Ornato the driver who Mike Pence said he didn't trust to get in the car the night of the insurrection. Pence said the driver would take him to Alaska.

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
4. JESUS LORD - READ IT!
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:16 PM
Jun 2022

An "anonymous source" disputes the testimony.

A "source close to the secret service".

Hey, you wanna know a source close to the secret service? DONALD FUCKING TRUMP.

Good god, what has gotten into people tonight

Ocelot II

(115,735 posts)
5. The Daily Mail is, in fact, a right-wing tabloid,
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:16 PM
Jun 2022

and has often been criticized for sensational and inaccurate reporting.

Ford_Prefect

(7,901 posts)
19. Nothing in The Daily Mail is to be taken at face value. It has been a RW propaganda rag since it was
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 11:55 PM
Jun 2022

founded and was quite widely known for this during the previous century. They have been sued, and has lost often, for inventing scandals and slurring people in the public eye.

I wouldn't waste it in the bottom of a bird cage let alone read it for genuine content. Like FOX News it tells whatever stories suit the editor's and owner's politics and pocketbook. It has often been used to plant RW gossip and misleading stories which curiously had no verifiable source.

It defines the term tabloid.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
20. Thank you! We are ALL just trying to make sense
Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:08 AM
Jun 2022

Of ALL this rapidly evolving shit! Thanks for your rational mind !

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
22. .
Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:14 AM
Jun 2022

June 8, 2022

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/08/trump-raised-jan-6-capitol-appearance-secret-service-agent-select-panel-00038217

Engel told Jan. 6 select committee investigators that the two men discussed Trump’s desire to go to the Capitol and took different views on the topic. Engel noted that they went back to the White House instead of heading to Capitol Hill. The contents of Engel’s testimony have not been previously reported. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi declined to comment.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
21. Just curious... Why do you describe any kind of questioning or
Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:11 AM
Jun 2022

speaking about what is reported in legit news orgs as rw bs? Shouldn't we Ds have a place where we can go to to hypothesize and roll with the flow of information?

 

Effete Snob

(8,387 posts)
23. Bullshit
Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:16 AM
Jun 2022

An unsourced tweet - reposted in a right wing tabloid, is not “legit news”.

Engel’s prior testimony is consistent with Hutchinson:

June 8, 2022

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/08/trump-raised-jan-6-capitol-appearance-secret-service-agent-select-panel-00038217

Engel told Jan. 6 select committee investigators that the two men discussed Trump’s desire to go to the Capitol and took different views on the topic. Engel noted that they went back to the White House instead of heading to Capitol Hill. The contents of Engel’s testimony have not been previously reported. Secret Service spokesperson Anthony Guglielmi declined to comment.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
6. Agree with your assessment to a point...think about the 2 SS loyal to a fault to tfg..they
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:21 PM
Jun 2022

Aren't going to tell the J6..about the scene in the SUV...too loyal..and, unless the J6 knew about the scene, they didn't know to ask...just sayin'..

kcr

(15,317 posts)
7. If they were so loyal they were willing to lie to the committee
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:24 PM
Jun 2022

Then they would have followed Trump's orders and driven him to the Capitol.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
9. It probably never came up...seriously..unless it was a subject of questioning..and if they were
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:30 PM
Jun 2022

Deposed b4 Cassidy..no one knew toask...

Sure bet now the J6 will ask Engel and Ornado..let's see if they lie now..

kcr

(15,317 posts)
10. The committee stands by her testimony
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:32 PM
Jun 2022

Which never would have happened if they hadn't corroborated it.

asiliveandbreathe

(8,203 posts)
11. Okay then...so someone is just blowing smoke...who broke the story...P Alexanderr..or Daily Mail..or
Tue Jun 28, 2022, 10:37 PM
Jun 2022

John Baron..

Pence knew he was headed to Alaska if he got in the SUV...

SunSeeker

(51,574 posts)
24. I wouldn't trust Engel even if he denied Trump ever assaulted him.
Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:16 AM
Jun 2022

Remember, Pence would not get in a Secret Service car to leave the Capitol on 1/6. What does that tell you about the trustworthiness of the Trump White House Secret Service? And what kind of person would Trump pick to be in charge of his Secret Service detail? Engel must have been vetted to be a true believer Trumper willing to lie for Trump. If the man would take a bullet for Trump, do you think he would hesitate about lying for Trump?

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
25. Agree. So what do you think the J6 committee was trying
Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:23 AM
Jun 2022

doing by putting a witness up there that the criminals would refute?

SunSeeker

(51,574 posts)
26. Because she is a credible witness who was in the WH with Trump during the Capitol attack.
Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:36 AM
Jun 2022

The committee needed insider testimony for that day to establish Trump's state of mind. She provided it.

This woman did nothing wrong and was not involved in the plot to attack the Capitol. So she had no incentive to tell the committee lies. She was not giving her testimony to get herself a lighter sentence. She is doing it out of civic duty, and despite threats against her by Trump World goons, and Trump trashing her.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The J6 Committee Already ...