General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump White House attorney disputes Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony about handwritten note, per ABC
Former Trump White House lawyer Eric Herschmann is claiming that a handwritten note regarding a potential statement for then-President Donald Trump to release during the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol was written by him during a meeting at the White House that afternoon, and not by White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, sources familiar with the matter tell ABC News.
Hobo
intrepidity
(7,307 posts)That looks like a guy's handwriting. I know, sexist, but I was surprised when she claimed it was hers.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)obamanut2012
(26,080 posts)There is no such thing as a "guy's handwriting."
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)My other driver, a woman, has the worse handwriting I've ever seen in my lifetime, but I get compliments on my handwriting on how easy it is to read.
Gender has absolutely zero to do with handwriting.
JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)the note for trump to release on the January 6 attack. Did I miss it?
The note I thought I saw was just two lines, it didn't look like a statement to me
I am thinking the two line note was given to her, and she was told to cross out the word "criminal" in the note, which is probably what she did. I don't know, but it sure doesn't change a damn thing
yardwork
(61,650 posts)I don't understand why we would believe a Trumpster who is not under oath, who said something to a reporter, supposedly. The Trumpsters lie.
fishwax
(29,149 posts)this isn't even Herschman going on the record with a reporter, let alone testifying under oath. No reason to take any of this seriously until he's willing to put skin in the game
Mr.Bill
(24,303 posts)They're scared about something. Very scared.
Brother Buzz
(36,444 posts)I saw it on the television, so it's around, but I can't find it now.
Response to Brother Buzz (Reply #4)
JohnSJ This message was self-deleted by its author.
demmiblue
(36,865 posts)Baked Potato
(7,733 posts)blm
(113,065 posts)JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)told to write the following note that was dictated to her, and to her knowledge it was never used.
"ANYONE WHO Entered the Capital without proper authority should leave immediately"
It looks to me that ABC is misrepresenting the whole thing
Bring in the handwriting analysts
It was the fishmonger in the ladys wardrobe with the lipstick on his fingernail scrawling on the Micky Ds receipt
Deflect, deflect
😵💫
✌🏻
blogslug
(38,002 posts)Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)It seems very unlikely that she wouldn't know her own damn handwriting. She would be dissembling under oath, in front of millions of people, about something that could be checked to within a reasonable degree of accuracy.
Here's what she said:
LIZ CHENEY: Now let's look at just one example of what some senior advisers to the president were urging. Ms. Hutchinson, could you look at the exhibit that we're showing on the screen now? Have you seen this note before?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That's a note that I wrote at the direction of the chief of staff on January 6th, likely around 3:00.
LIZ CHENEY: And it's written on a chief of staff note card, but that's your handwriting, Ms. Hutchinson?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That's my handwriting.
LIZ CHENEY: And why did you write this note?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: The chief of staff was in a meeting with Eric Hirschman and potentially Mr. Philbin, and they had rushed out of the office fairly quickly. Mark had handed me the note card with one of his pens, and sort of dictating a statement for the president to potentially put out.
LIZ CHENEY: And no, I'm sorry. Go ahead.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That's Ok. There are two phrases on there, one illegal and then one without proper authority. The illegal phrase was the one that Mr. Meadows had dictated to me. Mr. Herschmann had chimed in and said also put without legal authority. There should have been a slash between the two phrases. It was an an or if the president had opted to put one of those statements out. Evidently he didn't. Later that afternoon, Mark came back from the Oval Dining Room and put the palm card on my desk with illegally crossed out, but said we didn't need to take further action on that statement.
MFM008
(19,817 posts)to discredit Ms. Hutchison ASAP.
Samrob
(4,298 posts)As I recall, she never claimed to be the originator of the message. She said it was dictated to her.
JohnSJ
(92,219 posts)MichMan
(11,938 posts)Pretty simple to have a forensic handwriting analysis done by a couple different experts.
indigovalley
(113 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)the more they attack her, the more credibility they add to her testimony.
peggysue2
(10,832 posts)How withering and truly damaging her comments were when it comes to Trump's knowledge of the plan, his intent and personal involvement, and really indicts the entire WH crew and inner circle who knew and did little to stop the insanity.
People died on J6. Scores of police officers were injured, some gravely so. The Capitol was defiled and our democracy and rule of law viciously attacked.
Serious criminal liability. For all of them. Any wonder why they're squirming and screeching, trying their best to tear Hutchinson down?
Not really.
edhopper
(33,587 posts)Seems that Hutchinson would not lie about her own hand writing.
Patton French
(758 posts)Hugin
(33,164 posts)No trying this in the court of public opinion, which is what they are trying to do with these missives.