Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeople want to know what dish 45 threw against the wall that splashed ketchup ...
... I'm thinking hamberders.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
28 replies, 1619 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
28 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People want to know what dish 45 threw against the wall that splashed ketchup ... (Original Post)
marble falls
Jun 2022
OP
usonian
(9,815 posts)1. burnt steak.
grumpyduck
(6,240 posts)5. I read something a couple years ago
that he put ketchup on a $50 steak in Air Force One.
Does he put ketchup on his cereal too?
2naSalit
(86,647 posts)15. Probably.
I noticed something years ago having been exposed to a number of individuals with psychological issues... they put ketchup on everything, unless it's desert-like.
JoanofArgh
(14,971 posts)2. Hamburgers but , you know, I bet anything he puts ketchup on his steak, too.
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)3. am i the only one here who detests ketchup?
and don't get me started on ranch dressing..............
XanaDUer2
(10,683 posts)6. HATE ranch nt
dweller
(23,641 posts)7. Hate that crap
But Im ok with ranch
✌🏻
catbyte
(34,403 posts)11. YAY! Another ranch dressing detester, lol.
It's vile and ranch dressing served with buffalo wings should be illegal.
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)12. LOL!!!!
Elessar Zappa
(14,004 posts)14. I like both.
I have simple tastes lol.
npk
(3,660 posts)16. give me ketchup or give me death
Ranch I could do without.
greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)18. I don't eat ketchup or mustard.
Ranch is okay, though.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)23. I hate blue cheese.
grumpyduck
(6,240 posts)24. Okay, more for me.
captain queeg
(10,208 posts)4. Didn't he make a guest have the meatloaf? He's a real gourmet.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)8. Nixon put ketchup on his cottage cheese. nt
we all knew Nixon was evil
spanone
(135,844 posts)10. Unhappy Meal
Docreed2003
(16,863 posts)13. 🤣🤣🤣 thread winner
usonian
(9,815 posts)19. If he ever ate greens (fat chance of that) he'd have made a fine tossed salad.
BigDemVoter
(4,150 posts)20. Steak for sure, no?
Doesn't that pig eat it with ketchup?
BumRushDaShow
(129,098 posts)21. Wellllllllllll....
U.S. Holds The Ketchup In Schools
By Mary Thornton and Martin Schram
September 26, 1981
Charging that the Agriculture Department "not only has egg on its face, but ketchup, too," Budget Director David A. Stockman said yesterday he had ordered the withdrawal of proposed federal rules that would have listed ketchup and pickle relish as vegetables in school lunches. He said the controversial guidelines, which also would have allowed the substitution of soybean cakes for hamburger and doughnuts for bread, were the result of a "bureaucratic goof." Stockman's rough-edged remarks were an obvious effort at damage-control. The proposed redefinition of the school lunch has let the Democrats embarrass the administration as rarely before. But Stockman's effort to stop one flap instantly started another. Agriculture Secretary John R. Block, whose department issued the regulation, was sorely miffed.
Block met with President Reagan late in the afternoon and later said pointedly that he and the president agreed that the guidelines should be reconsidered "due to adverse public reaction." Stockman might never have existed. "The president and I both feel that the intent was sound and in step with the administration's goal to reduce regulation and return flexibility to the local units of government," Block said. James Johnson, an aide to Block, later defended the regulations: "There was a great misunderstanding in the land as to how these regulations are viewed. I think it would be a mistake to say that ketchup per se was classified as a vegetable . . . . Ketchup in combination with other things was classified as a vegetable." What other things? he was asked. "French fries or hamburgers," he replied.
A White House aide confirmed that Block was angered by Stockman's remarks. "There's some sensitivity to the way all this came out. There's also some sensitivity about what the regulations had to say in the first place." The administration has been ridiculed since it released the regulations, which would have set the minimum lunch requirement for a kindergarten child at four ounces of milk, half a piece of bread, half a cup of fruit or a vegetable, and one ounce of meat--about one-quarter of a medium-sized hamburger. The guidelines were supposed to help schools that provide free or reduced-price lunches to lower-income students as they try to deal with a $1 billion cut in federal support for the fiscal year that begins next Thursday.
The General Accounting Office reported earlier this month that lunches being served in many high schools already fail the basic nutritional tests and that the cutbacks could only make the situation worse. On Thursday, a group of Democratic senators invited reporters and photographers in as they ate a school lunch consisting of a meat-and-soybean patty, a slice of bread, a few french fries, ketchup, and a partially filled glass of milk. And yesterday, even a Republican, Sen. John Heinz of Pennsylvania, whose family owns the H.J. Heinz Co., said, "Ketchup is a condiment. This is one of the most ridiculous regulations I ever heard of, and I suppose I need not add that I know something about ketchup and relish--or did at one time."
(snip)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/09/26/us-holds-the-ketchup-in-schools/9ffd029a-17f5-4e8c-ab91-1348a44773ee/
By Mary Thornton and Martin Schram
September 26, 1981
Charging that the Agriculture Department "not only has egg on its face, but ketchup, too," Budget Director David A. Stockman said yesterday he had ordered the withdrawal of proposed federal rules that would have listed ketchup and pickle relish as vegetables in school lunches. He said the controversial guidelines, which also would have allowed the substitution of soybean cakes for hamburger and doughnuts for bread, were the result of a "bureaucratic goof." Stockman's rough-edged remarks were an obvious effort at damage-control. The proposed redefinition of the school lunch has let the Democrats embarrass the administration as rarely before. But Stockman's effort to stop one flap instantly started another. Agriculture Secretary John R. Block, whose department issued the regulation, was sorely miffed.
Block met with President Reagan late in the afternoon and later said pointedly that he and the president agreed that the guidelines should be reconsidered "due to adverse public reaction." Stockman might never have existed. "The president and I both feel that the intent was sound and in step with the administration's goal to reduce regulation and return flexibility to the local units of government," Block said. James Johnson, an aide to Block, later defended the regulations: "There was a great misunderstanding in the land as to how these regulations are viewed. I think it would be a mistake to say that ketchup per se was classified as a vegetable . . . . Ketchup in combination with other things was classified as a vegetable." What other things? he was asked. "French fries or hamburgers," he replied.
A White House aide confirmed that Block was angered by Stockman's remarks. "There's some sensitivity to the way all this came out. There's also some sensitivity about what the regulations had to say in the first place." The administration has been ridiculed since it released the regulations, which would have set the minimum lunch requirement for a kindergarten child at four ounces of milk, half a piece of bread, half a cup of fruit or a vegetable, and one ounce of meat--about one-quarter of a medium-sized hamburger. The guidelines were supposed to help schools that provide free or reduced-price lunches to lower-income students as they try to deal with a $1 billion cut in federal support for the fiscal year that begins next Thursday.
The General Accounting Office reported earlier this month that lunches being served in many high schools already fail the basic nutritional tests and that the cutbacks could only make the situation worse. On Thursday, a group of Democratic senators invited reporters and photographers in as they ate a school lunch consisting of a meat-and-soybean patty, a slice of bread, a few french fries, ketchup, and a partially filled glass of milk. And yesterday, even a Republican, Sen. John Heinz of Pennsylvania, whose family owns the H.J. Heinz Co., said, "Ketchup is a condiment. This is one of the most ridiculous regulations I ever heard of, and I suppose I need not add that I know something about ketchup and relish--or did at one time."
(snip)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1981/09/26/us-holds-the-ketchup-in-schools/9ffd029a-17f5-4e8c-ab91-1348a44773ee/
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)26. i remember that
to quote Forest Gump: "stupid is as stupid does"
Xavier Breath
(3,642 posts)22. Knowing him, probably ice cream.
Voltaire2
(13,061 posts)27. A cup of cofeefe.
Emile
(22,789 posts)28. One thing for sure, whatever it was his wife didn't cook it.