General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSanta Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company
This is all very confusing to me, but I remember Thom Hartmann pointing it out. Maybe this is the 14th Amendment-related case that SCOTUS should revisit.
From Wikipedia:
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, 118 U.S. 394 (1886), is a corporate law case of the United States Supreme Court concerning taxation of railroad properties. The case is most notable for a headnote stating that the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment grants constitutional protections to corporations.
snip
The headnote, which is "not the work of the Court, but is simply the work of the Reporter, giving his understanding of the decision, prepared for the convenience of the profession",[2] was written by the Reporter of Decisions, former president of the Newburgh and New York Railway Company J.C. Bancroft Davis.
snip
So the headnote was a reporting by the Reporter of Decisions of the Chief Justice's interpretation of the Justices' opinions. But the issue of applicability of "Equal Protection to any persons" to the railroads was not addressed in the decision of the Court in the case.
Snip
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)Strongly recommended viewing. During the Dumbya/Cheney reign of terror (as many of us defined it at the time) a movement for clean money campaign, newly revised Sunshine Law reforms were underway, and a deep dive into dark money behind the "Corporate Personhood" proliferating in courts. We learned it all began during the "industrial revolution" and the case of Santa Clara county vs Pacific Railroad. That is a story with a lower court decision that set the president, when it shouldn't have ever seen the light of day.
Wikioedea:
Back drop on the film The Corporation
Poster:
The Corporation
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Sometimes titles like this don't show up in the first menus, and it might be on a free service.
msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)so maybe both are on youtube?
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)It has TFG in it, for sure.
ultralite001
(894 posts)..."decades of immoral, destructive conduct by businesses whose CEOs understand that any fines that might be levied against them for their actions are worth paying, given the massive profits those actions will create."
More true every day...
Wounded Bear
(58,666 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,282 posts)Corporations are Persons. therefore...... etc...... etc...
corruption to nth degree
Retrograde
(10,137 posts)so of course stare decisis will hold in this case. If anything, they'll strengthen it - they know where the money is coming from.