State Leaders Raise Constitutionality Concerns After Feds Call For Stop To Protesting Outside

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

Justices’ Maryland Homes

BALTIMORE (WJZ) — Emotions are still running high more than a week after the U.S. Supreme Court decided to overturn Roe v. Wade.

People protesting the decision have brought their disappointment with it into the neighborhoods where some Supreme Court justices reside.

That action prompted the marshal of the court to send a letter to the governors in Maryland and Virginia asking them to enforce local and state laws that “prohibit picketing at the homes of” the justices.

But that request is getting push-back because limiting protests on public property could be a violation of a person’s First Amendment rights.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/state-leaders-raise-constitutionality-concerns-after-feds-call-for-stop-to-protesting-outside-justices-maryland-homes/ar-AAZc4ea

The GOP SCOTUS picks could care less about the Constitution.

[MyOwnPeace]

1. Thank GAWD for the 'push-back'............

after all, these 'Let-'em-eat-cake' Judges can't forget about the actual 'rights' that we Americans have, can they?

What? Oh - THEY get to decide what rights THEY want us to have or NOT have...........

Silly me - I thought they believed in the Constitution........

[Mme. Defarge]

2. I was taught a long time ago

that a key legal principle is that a law must be 1) reasonable and 2) enforceable. Prohibition, as an example, though I’m not old enough to remember it.

[SharonClark]

3. Love the push back. Hope they don't relent.

[NYC Liberal]

4. And who's going to ultimately settle the question?

Oh.

[Igel]

7. Legislature(s). n/t

[UTUSN]

5. K& Big R #5

[Demovictory9]

6. Keep protesting

[LetMyPeopleVote]

8. SCOTUS Wants To Take Away Constitutional Rights Of Protesters Protesting About Constitutional Rights

Link to tweet

Link to tweet