General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, if the police knew about the Higland Park terrorist, why didn't a red flag
strategy work?
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,465 posts)Serious question. I'm "working" now. I don't have the TV on.
Thanks.
Baitball Blogger
(46,720 posts)My guess is that his father had some social standing in the community, so they gave him a pass.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,465 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,720 posts)apparently it means nothing.
mahatmakanejeeves
(57,465 posts)If he had been in a bar fight and been arrested for that, or had beat up a girlfriend and been arrested for that, or had been in a string of DUI-related MVAs and been arrested for those, then I can see where the police could do something.
If all they knew about him was, "hey, there's that guy that goes around Highland Par, dressed as 'Where's Waldo?'," I don't see where's that a lot to go on.
If he doesn't have a record, then maybe there was no red flag.
Jilly_in_VA
(9,979 posts)THAT having a girlfriend. Boyfriend maybe, if said BF were really a masochist.....and I recognize that as possibly an anti-gay slur, for which I deeply apologize.
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Police can't initiate the process in Illinois anyway...
https://icjia.illinois.gov/researchhub/articles/firearm-restraining-orders-in-illinois/
Only individuals with certain relationships to those who are at risk are eligible to file a FRO petition against them in Illinois; eligible individuals include blood relatives, presently married spouses, former spouses, persons who have a child in common, and household members (e.g. roommates, unmarried partners).
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)Here's some information about Illinois' red flag law. The police cannot initiate a firearm restraining order:
https://icjia.illinois.gov/researchhub/articles/firearm-restraining-orders-in-illinois/
Only individuals with certain relationships to those who are at risk are eligible to file a FRO petition against them in Illinois; eligible individuals include blood relatives, presently married spouses, former spouses, persons who have a child in common, and household members (e.g. roommates, unmarried partners).
What is it you would have wanted the police to do?
MontanaMama
(23,319 posts)I heard multiple times on MSNBC that the suspect was known to law enforcement.
ForgedCrank
(1,782 posts)interesting point for sure.
It could amount to just general stupid behavior in his past. When things are worded that way as I read on the WGN News website, it makes me believe he had multiple encounters with police, not that he was necessarily on some watch list. Maybe just a common nuisance or something.
I'd certainly like to know more about that. I'm sure we will in the coming days.
Chainfire
(17,542 posts)No telling what databases we are in.
I suspect that over the next few days, we will find out more than we want to about the murderer. Like most folks here, I presume that he is guilty until proven innocent, so the most important think to know about him is that he is an American terrorist, who was (probably quite legally) armed with weapon that was made to kill people, and had no mental or moral reservations about attacking random people for sport, probably seeking some kind of "meaning" to his pathetic life.
What we can be assured or, is that there are more just like him out there planning similar actions. There will be people who have already bought the guns and ammo and are waiting for their chance to become infamous. Our government enables them through their lack of willpower to go against the firearm industry. We can look to other nations to see the effectiveness of sane firearm controls, but we are unwilling to enact them. It is the power of the almighty dollar.
LeftInTX
(25,364 posts)His dad ran for mayor and city council, which puts him in the public eye.
I believe he may have had an arrest record.
However, when you drive around a small town with a vehicle that looks like this, the cops will "know you"...
Link to tweet
/photo/1
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)rzemanfl
(29,565 posts)bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)I know California has a database for these things, so when someone goes to buy a gun, it gets flagged.
I don't know what Illinois law is.
There's also a difference between being aware and proactively taking steps. If there are laws to prevent this kind of thing and no one bothered to trigger the law, did they really use any kind of strategy?
Effete Snob
(8,387 posts)The IL red flag law allows for two week suspension and temporary removal of the person's firearms, once certain conditions are met, and requires a court hearing.
It must be renewed every two weeks.
So, what is it that the police knew that would have been worth going to court every two weeks to prove?
AkFemDem
(1,826 posts)And sought lots of public attention. Im sure he has had small run ins with the law, but that doesnt mean hed actually ever been charged with a crime that would have landed him on a red flag list. Being known to law enforcement doesnt mean he had been suspected of violence- it could have been as simple as being known as a local pot head or petty thief.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)we want to live in a place where anybody "on police radar" is surveilled and/or harassed. I think it's called profiling. Which no one likes until somebody who fits a profile actually does something.
LeftInTX
(25,364 posts)If he was driving around town in this crazy vehicle, cops would certainly have known him. His dad ran unsuccessfully for mayor and city council, so this would also put him in the spot light.
I believe he may have had a misdemeanor arrest in the past.
Link to tweet
/photo/1
RussBLib
(9,019 posts)just guessing.
Seems like maybe there should be some restrictions on posting murderous videos like this kid was doing.
"Oh, it's only my art" presents a rather tough nut to crack.
usonian
(9,810 posts)Now, suppose that he was
Black
Posting "anti-fascist" stuff
There'd be detectives parked outside his house 24 by 7.
To quote a famous sports personality: "COME ON PEOPLE"
discntnt_irny_srcsm
(18,479 posts)What is a Red Flag in Illinois Gun Law?
A red flag is considered to be any sign that points to a persons potential intent or likelihood to commit an act of violence against themselves or others. These can include threats or comments relating to violence, a history of lashing out aggressively, or social media posts and text messages relating to violence. These red flags can also include signs of a persons potential violence against themselves such as a history of self-harm or deep depression.
Under the Firearms Restraining Order Act, these red flags may serve as evidence to petition for an individual to have their firearms removed for at least two weeks. Recognizing and noting these signs of potential violence can be vital in assuring that a petition for a temporary firearms restraining order is granted and to know that a person is protected from hurting themselves or others.
How to Remove Someones Firearm in Illinois
A petition can be filed by a family member, an interested third party, or by police against an individual they believe to be an immediate and present danger to themselves or others. This petition for the temporary restraining order must be heard by a judge as soon as possible, either the same day it is filed or on the next court day. The hearing and order can occur ex parte, meaning with or without the accused individual present and without notice to the individual.