Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsClarence Thomas once opposed Highland Park's assault weapons ban, saying that the 'overwhelming
majority' of those with the rifles use them lawfullyNearly a decade before Monday's deadly mass shooting at a Fourth of July parade in Highland Park, Illinois, that left six dead and dozens injured, the Chicago suburb banned assault rifles like AR‐15s and AK‐47s.
That 2013 ban was swiftly challenged and the case made it all the way to the US Supreme Court, which ultimately rejected to hear it and instead let a lower court's ruling in favor of the ordinance stand.
But at the time, conservative Justice Clarence Thomas who joined the nation's highest court in 1991 opposed Highland Park's prohibition on assault weapons and large-capacity magazines, writing in a dissent that the "overwhelming majority" who use such weapons use them lawfully.
In Thomas' dissent, which was filed in December 2015 and joined by the late Justice Antonin Scalia, he called assault weapons "modern sporting rifles" and made references to the Second Amendment.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/crime/justice-clarence-thomas-once-opposed-highland-park-s-assault-weapons-ban-saying-that-the-overwhelming-majority-of-those-with-the-rifles-use-them-lawfully/ar-AAZecyE?cvid=7decee04f5434a9784df061d89f2a43c
Because shooting up a crowd of people is a great American sport.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 850 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clarence Thomas once opposed Highland Park's assault weapons ban, saying that the 'overwhelming (Original Post)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jul 2022
OP
Even if "the overwhelming majority" of assault rifle owners use them lawfully,
Ocelot II
Jul 2022
#1
Ocelot II
(115,706 posts)1. Even if "the overwhelming majority" of assault rifle owners use them lawfully,
it takes only one who doesn't to kill a whole lot of people in a very short time.
ZonkerHarris
(24,227 posts)2. amazing how muh death a small minority can deliver.
Pantagruel
(2,580 posts)3. Memo to Uncle Tom
It only takes one.
delisen
(6,043 posts)4. Says a lot about how we have arrived at these killing fields. nt
elias7
(4,006 posts)5. Overwhelming majority use them lawfully????? All you need is one to not do so.
Thats why theyre better out of peoples hands..
kysrsoze
(6,021 posts)6. To think I used to despise Scalia... but Thomas is so, so much worse
Scalia actually was aware of lines of constitutionality which he knew should not be crossed. Those lines don't exist for justices Pubic Hair, Beer Bong, Gorsuck, Alito and Barrett.