General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsH2O Man
(73,559 posts)This might drive him to drink.
Haggard Celine
(16,846 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)to preserve the decency of their other customers.
Fuck him, and fuck them.
claudette
(3,578 posts)outside the restaurant? They had every right to be there peaceably. What a shame he was "bothered" by the noise. I read that Kavanaugh doesn't know there is no "right to eat dinner in a restaurant without noise" specifically written in the Constitution.
Swede
(33,257 posts)This post says you'll have a good time and many a post here.
I like it here!
jimfields33
(15,823 posts)Remember when the Supreme Court ruled for gay marriage? Would we be as cool if protesters followed our liberal judges everywhere? Im not so sure wed have the same outlook.
Raven123
(4,849 posts)However, I look at those lives lost due gun violence, and the unwillingness of SCOTUS to uphold reasonable laws. I think of Buffalo, where people were shopping. They will never eat another dinner. Its a different time. SCOTUS is out of touch with the American people, and have NO check. Im nit sure they should feel completely comfortable.
vapor2
(1,248 posts)Captain Zero
(6,811 posts)Fuck him if he can't take a joke.
treestar
(82,383 posts)Or the liberal justices don't whine about it.
the right to peaceful protest is there, though I agree, it would be better not to make it personal and protest in front of the Supreme Court building rather than follow justices around to places like home and restaurants. But as to the First Amendment, there is a right to do that anyway. Just stay on the public paths.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)As Shumer said, there are protesters outside his house every week. He just doesn't cry about it like the cons do.
Happy Hoosier
(7,314 posts)I mean, you can argue that it's inappropriate, but I think it's hard to argue that they don't have a right to protest.
jimfields33
(15,823 posts)wnylib
(21,487 posts)Ruling against abortion hurts many.
One is not worth protesting. The other is.
KPN
(15,646 posts)the harm it does -- including loss of life -- on many.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)abortion. They drew first blood, its war.
bluestarone
(16,976 posts)THEY will do it to us in a heartbeat! If it's our right, DO IT!
Maraya1969
(22,483 posts)affects no on in a negative way unless they are filled with bigotry. They screamed that gay marriage would affect "the sanctity of marriage" but I bet if you asked anyone of them if their marriage was any less sacred they would say "NO"
What these others ones did is take away rights, make women more vulnerable and make poor people poorer. That is a big difference in my opinion.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)We're already in the fight. Better to fight back than to pretend it isn't so.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)agingdem
(7,850 posts)can reference his 14th century Witches and Wizards playbook and come up with an incantation or two he can apply to the Constitution regarding Kavanaugh's flight from his beer soaked blood rare fillet...
2naSalit
(86,647 posts)Maybe he'll get liver cancer from all that booze.
FelineOverlord
(3,580 posts)FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)Let him get take-out, for all I care.
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)llmart
(15,540 posts)Also, if he is so anxious to take women back to the 1950's, why isn't he at home having his wife cook him some weenies and beans? In an apron and high heels and bringing him a cocktail as he floats in the door.
FelineOverlord
(3,580 posts)Caliman73
(11,738 posts)Show me where it says you have a Constitutionally protected right to eat at a restaurant without protest.
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)probably be a big problem for him for a while
leftyladyfrommo
(18,868 posts)probably be a big problem for him for a while. Good restaurants aren't going to want him. They aren't going to want that kind of trouble.
DBoon
(22,369 posts)ARPad95
(1,671 posts)nourishment from a breast at the dinner table.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)FelineOverlord
(3,580 posts)Bettie
(16,110 posts)could have chosen to face the consequences of his decisions.
If he believes in what he's doing, if he truly believes that women are little more than incubators, devoid of human rights, then he should have faced the protestors and said so.
But, he's a cowardly piece of shit.
grumpyduck
(6,240 posts)What about all those lawmakers who had their peaceful work session to confirm the election "disturbed" by a mob of non-peaceful assholes?
Get used to it.
malaise
(269,054 posts)Fuck him.
blueknight73
(295 posts)Fucking pricks should never be able to enjoy a meal out again. Ruin their fucking lives, like all the fucking lives they have ruined
eShirl
(18,494 posts)DBoon
(22,369 posts)... by having to share the dining room with an incompetent, evil judge who somehow managed to become a Supreme Court justice.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)to refuse to seat anyone, as long as there is not e.g. racial discrimination involved?
Morton's didn't have to take his reservation?
They could have avoided the incident by not seating him.
plimsoll
(1,670 posts)It's one of the ultimate acts of conspicuous consumption.
Raven
(13,893 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)I'm sure the NRA or evanhellical xtians are picking up the tab.
yardwork
(61,650 posts)SergeStorms
(19,204 posts)or through the Federalist Society. That's where I'd place my bet. They wanted to clean up the drunken Frat-boy's economic indiscretions before a "thorough" FBI investigation.
on the "thorough" FBI investigation.
ARPad95
(1,671 posts)Sniveling coward!
pfitz59
(10,381 posts)They have condemned women to 'involuntary servitude'. They should pay the price for their evil.
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)jeffreyi
(1,943 posts)delisen
(6,044 posts)It is sad tha Mortons did not affirm the rights of our citizens in its statement.
Marcuse
(7,488 posts)LoisB
(7,206 posts)Gorsuch.
Not anymore. The Supreme Court just ruled so. Live by the sword, die by the sword!
dchill
(38,505 posts)..."void of decency." Like they're the arbiters, here. I'm thinking maybe Brett might not want to go out to eat for the foreseeable future. Just a thought.
Initech
(100,081 posts)He doesn't get to eat peacefully...
Wingus Dingus
(8,054 posts)Fuck him and the others.
TNNurse
(6,927 posts)justhanginon
(3,290 posts)their state to receive proper health care because of you and your theocratic buddies.
Traildogbob
(8,756 posts)Someone posted here earlier Dinner is not in the constitution. I did not read it but now I know exactly what it meant. Most excellent.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,492 posts)A few may even work at that restaurant, including some that might wish they could join the protest.
Let's discuss void of decency in a much broader context.
Kavanaugh's rulings are about as selfish and void of decency as it gets, so why did they serve him?
Elitist asshole........
They_Live
(3,236 posts)He lied to the American People.
This is what happens when you lie and are a black-out alcoholic rapist liar freak.
Happy Hoosier
(7,314 posts).... I'd like to remind you of the gauntlets that women going to women's health clinics have had to endure for DECADES.
Fuck Boofinaugh.
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)he deserves more than a few protesters.
Wicked Blue
(5,834 posts)cbabe
(3,548 posts)minstrel76
(83 posts)I mean, he didn't have to sexually assault those women, and he didn't have to lie at his confirmation hearing, and he didn't have to refuse to have any consideration for the possible impacts of his SCOTUS decisions, or the people he is hurting with them. But he did anyway. Therefore, I say if he has to look over his shoulder for the rest of his life because of all this, then *shrugs*.
yaesu
(8,020 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)irisblue
(32,980 posts)Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(108,035 posts)All that beer chugging can make it hard to keep one's dinner down.
CaptainTruth
(6,594 posts)[link:|]
dixiechiken1
(2,113 posts)Fuck him. 🖕
wnylib
(21,487 posts)aggiesal
(8,918 posts)outside of supreme court justices' homes,
it's important to remember that in the 90s the court
held that protesting outside of the homes of
abortion clinic employees is protected by the first amendment.
James48
(4,436 posts)$ 13 for French onion soup.
$13 for a baked potato
$ 13 for a side of Brussels sprouts.
And
$139 for a ribeye steak.
Not to mention the price of drinks.
Sorry Brett, but no beer bongs here. Go find another place.
relayerbob
(6,544 posts)Did he cry as he left, or was he not drunk enough yet?
And Morton's? Over-priced and under-quality, IMO. But about right for a lowlife trying to look cool
SWBTATTReg
(22,137 posts)on long term things that have been settled law. What's next, the right to protest peacefully anywhere would be deemed illegal? The right to vote period? The right to drive? The right to work at a decent paying job?
Turbineguy
(37,343 posts)Leave it alone.
elias7
(4,007 posts)Given his proclivity for abusing girls and young women, I wouldnt find it hard to believe he didnt impregnate someone
sl8
(13,787 posts)Also not found in the Constitution.
Blue Owl
(50,427 posts)Emile
(22,789 posts)dalton99a
(81,516 posts)Emile
(22,789 posts)Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)So kick and rec.
Cha
(297,322 posts)Much More than "Disturbed".
Please Fight to Save Our Democracy💙 in 2022 & 2024!:
cagefreesoylentgreen
(838 posts)This just reeks of "Let them eat steak!" all over. $120 for a chain restaurant steak, $30 for a baked potato? Yes, let there be no peasants here!
live love laugh
(13,118 posts)DFW
(54,407 posts)Maybe if he said he liked steak, they would have left him alone
Well, that and letting Roe stand