General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDear Media: When the court strips rights from Americans, it's not a blow to POTUS.
It is a blow to Democrcy and Americans. It is the attempts of the extremist right to control people.
Blue Owl
(50,407 posts)Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)erronis
(15,295 posts)but not very nourishing.
The Media thinks that their consumers want a KFC/McD diet - that the consumers don't appreciate flavors, textures, and nuances.
For some of the Media - that is correct. Too many people I know (older, home-bound) get their Media stream from one RW source.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)That's not a blow to the court, it's equal treatment under the law. If I don't have a right to privacy, neither does Justice Boof.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)Haggard Celine
(16,846 posts)Fuck me, Justice Boof? Well fuck you too!
calimary
(81,304 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,082 posts)The president had a chance to pass his agenda when his approval rating was at its highest. Without the public's support, it's hard for him to convince members of Congress to fall in line.
Jan. 20, 2022, 2:27 PM EST
By Lincoln Mitchell, political analyst
In a blow to President Joe Biden, activists and American democracy, efforts to protect voting rights were defeated in the Senate on Wednesday by Democratic Sens. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin of West Virginia.
The ability of a president to influence members of Congress is always limited. It seems like frequently members of the opposition party care little about what the president says or does. With regards to voting rights, this means that Biden has, rightly, written off the idea of getting any Republicans to vote to protect the rights of all Americans to vote. Most presidents can influence their own party, but even that kind of presidential power ebbs and flows.
Unfortunately, Biden decided to lean on the Senate during a period when his power was at a low ebb.
(snip)
https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/biden-s-voting-rights-failure-senate-his-own-doing-ncna1287770
And in case the above relevance was missed - these bills were created in part to remedy the SCOTUS torpedoing Section 4 of the VRA, which then killed Section 5 by default, as well as a near-gutting of Section 2 last year, where both Voting Rights bills were done in order to fix those rulings and help to restore the increasing attempts by RW loons, including those on the SCOTUS, who are systematically intent on destroying voting rights and fair elections.
After that 2nd torpedo of Voting Rights by the SCOTUS, you had this crap -
Grace Panetta
Jul 2, 2021, 3:47 PM
Shortly after the Supreme Court handed down its decision in a major voting case Thursday, election law scholar Rick Hasen wrote that "the conservative Supreme Court has taken away all the major available tools for going after voting restrictions" and it couldn't come at a worse time for the Biden administration.
Following public criticism from advocacy groups and even some Democratic lawmakers directed at the White House for not taking a stronger and more urgent stance on voting rights, President Joe Biden is pledging to "go on the road" and speak "extensively" on voting rights while Vice President Kamala Harris takes the lead on the administration's voting rights push in Congress.
Voting rights advocates hoping for more concrete action, including through lawsuits over restrictive voting laws passed in GOP-controlled states, were dealt a major setback on Thursday with a consequential decision from the Supreme Court that throws their plans off the rails.
In Democratic National Committee v. Brnovich, the court ruled 6-3 to uphold two Arizona voting laws under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, with the majority opinion authored by Justice Samuel Alito setting new standards that will likely take a lot of force out of the law, designed to protect minority voters from voting discrimination nationwide and particularly in states with long histories of racist voter suppression.
(snip)
https://www.businessinsider.com/scotus-voting-decision-derails-dem-biden-admin-voting-rights-push-2021-7
It's never the Republicans' fault for destroying democracy and taking away rights. It's always "the Democrats" and "what are WE going to do about it?".
MontanaMama
(23,322 posts)Chris Jansing did exactly this today. Ridiculous.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,174 posts)I hate how the MSM reduces everything down to how it will affect one party or the other in popularity.
Nothing much about how it will affect actual Americans. As if that isn't the important aspect of ANY huge ruling like this.
And its also laughably sad how they frame it as a blow to POTUS, a Democrat, angling in on how it goes against Democrats pro choice policy positions. Instead of zeroing in on the fact that this is actually a blow to the GOP in that it is an unpopular ruling. Everything has to be framed in a way to sound the most negative towards Biden. They are desperate to balance the popularity of Trump vs Biden.
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)No one will have seen it coming
iluvtennis
(19,862 posts)Rebl2
(13,521 posts)dear media, it will be YOU they go after!
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)Rebl2
(13,521 posts)lies that their masters mandate them to tell
onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)Because moderates and suburban women and many others will be energized to support Democrats.
orleans
(34,056 posts)i know he's been getting blamed for several things (gas, inflation, unemployment, etc) but i haven't heard this one.
BumRushDaShow
(129,082 posts)ancianita
(36,066 posts)do.
If you publicly tell media that "the next group to have rights stripped will be YOU, media" that's what their owners want, anyway. They already do minimal coverage, if any at all, of what this president does.
Who own media but oligarchs who despise Democrats and this president, anyway. So they'd be happy to have any stripping of 1A rights so they could mosey on with their sharper anti-government media propaganda.