General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshlthe2b
(102,292 posts)nolabear
(41,986 posts)Caliman73
(11,738 posts)No one could have seen that coming...
It's almost like he just wanted attention, to cause a stir. Sure he tanked both Twitter and Tesla stock, but man people were certainly talking about him!!
SO, weren't there some sort of penalties or breach of contract provisions or fines or something. I mean the guy has 200 billion dollars so I am sure it won't hurt him financially.
Can we all stop thinking about Musk as some kind of genius now?
Hugin
(33,163 posts)Musk.
Maybe even by Monday.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)He waived due diligence. Twitter will sue and I suspect at some point there will be a settlement with Musk paying Twitter X billions of dollars. Twitter shareholders will be better off in the long run.
Caliman73
(11,738 posts)I am not a fan of Twitter, but they seem to be doing okay before the idiot Musk came along looking for his attention. If Musk had taken over and implemented his "vision", Twitter would have died a slow painful death after being overrun by crazy right wingers, forcing out all of the relatively sane people.
Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)Musk owes them $1 Billion. However it will go to court as he will say he was lied to.
former9thward
(32,023 posts)He waived due diligence so he can't say he was lied to. He can, but a court would say "too bad". The company will sue to force the deal. I think a settlement is likely will Musk paying quite a bit more than 1 billion.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)NOT. He never had any intention in buying Twitter. Just another one of his public stunts.
Hugin
(33,163 posts)
NO TWIT FOR THE TWIT!
FoxNewsSucks
(10,434 posts)but that wouldn't get published in the US.
Hugin
(33,163 posts)Did consider it, tho.
Maybe for the free flyers in Vegas or anywhere in London.
Claustrum
(4,845 posts)At the start, it sounded a lot like manipulating stock prices from the get-go. I don't know who tries to buy out a company wanting a reasonable price would do this so publicly to influence the stock prices.
edbermac
(15,941 posts)PJMcK
(22,037 posts)So what? They both suck.
Nevilledog
(51,121 posts)Reference to his 9 kids
H/T @gina_goldberg
Sky Jewels
(7,111 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,667 posts)Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)1. Attention.
2. A look at Twitter's books and bot information hidden from the public.
3. Just plain fucking with them because he can.
The man's a highly successful troll.
He doesn't care if it's good news or bad news - just as long as he's in the news.
And boy howdy do people oblige him.
tinrobot
(10,903 posts)If he had sold the $8 billion without a Twitter deal on the table, the stock would have tanked (along with his net worth.)
Even if he has to pay a billion of that to Twitter, he'll probably be ahead.
Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)Buy into Twitter when it's lower. Offer to buy the company. Stock goes up. Pull out of the buy claiming all kinds of company malfeasance and deal breaking. Stock goes down, but still higher than it was when he initially purchased.
Whatever penalty he has to pay isn't going to compare to the amount of money he's managing out of everything.
But the lawsuits should be absolutely epic. Mix in I think he's flicking at the SEC because he can. Or at least, he thinks he can. That has yet to be determined.
UTUSN
(70,708 posts)Johnny2X2X
(19,066 posts)Musk was goi g to turn Twitter into a totally unregulated cesspool for fascism.
regnaD kciN
(26,044 posts)former9thward
(32,023 posts)Tesla stock is up after the announcement about 12-13 points. Musk owns 175 million shares so that is is north of $2 billion in increased share value for Musk.
JHB
(37,160 posts)My world is unrocked.
In It to Win It
(8,254 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)As if...
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)The Delaware Chancery Court has ordered Tyson and Kohlberg & Co to close deals that had specific performance clauses
Link to tweet
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,321 posts)There is an artform to a good nasty litigation letter. Skadden's letter to Twitter was four pages and only stated that Mr. Musk believes that there were reasons to claim breach of the Merger Agreement. Skadden's letter was weak because Skadden did not necessarily trust Musk's claims.
Here is Wachtell's response https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1418091/000119312522191300/d370677dex992.htm
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
525 University Avenue, Suite 1400
Palo Alto, California 94301
Attention: Mike Ringler
Sonia K. Nijar
Dohyun Kim
Re: Purported Termination of Agreement and Plan of Merger
Dear Mr. Ringler:
This letter is sent on behalf of Twitter, Inc. (Twitter or the Company) in response to your July 8, 2022 letter, in which X Holdings I, Inc. purports to terminate the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Agreement) by and among Twitter, X Holdings I, Inc. (Parent), X Holdings II, Inc. (Acquisition Sub), and Elon R. Musk (together with Parent and Acquisition Sub, the Musk Parties). Capitalized terms used here and not otherwise defined have the meanings ascribed to them in the Agreement.
Mr. Musks and the other Musk Parties purported termination is invalid and wrongful, and it constitutes a repudiation of their obligations under the Agreement. Contrary to the assertions in your letter, Twitter has breached none of its obligations under the Agreement, and Twitter has not suffered and is not likely to suffer a Company Material Adverse Effect. The purported termination is invalid for the independent reason that Mr. Musk and the other Musk Parties have knowingly, intentionally, willfully, and materially breached the Agreement, including but not limited to Sections 6.3, 6.8, and 6.10 thereof. The Agreement is not terminated, the Bank Debt Commitment Letter and the Equity Commitment Letter remain in effect, and Twitter demands that Mr. Musk and the other Musk Parties comply with their obligations under the Agreement, including their obligations to use their respective reasonable best efforts to consummate and make effective the transactions contemplated by the Agreement (including by taking all steps necessary to obtain a favorable outcome under the United Kingdoms National Security and Investment Act 2021), the Bank Debt Commitment Letter, and the Equity Commitment Letter. As it has done, Twitter will continue to provide information reasonably requested by Mr. Musk under the Agreement and to diligently take all measures required to close the transaction.
Twitter reserves all contractual, legal, and other rights, including its right to specifically enforce the Musk Parties obligations under the Agreement.
Sincerely,
/s/ William Savitt
William Savitt
Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz