Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCourt temporarily blocks Arizona law granting 'personhood' to fetuses
The Hill via Yahoo NewsA federal judge in Arizona on Monday temporarily blocked a state law granting personhood to unborn fetuses from taking effect.
U.S. District Court Judge Douglas Rayes wrote in his ruling that Arizonas law was vague and therefore deprived plaintiffs of their due process rights.
Rayes also wrote the defendants who supported it failed to show the policy would not cause injury because its impact on abortion access was unclear, especially in comparison to other state laws that were less strict.
A law is unconstitutionally vague if its application is so unclear that people of ordinary intelligence cannot figure out in advance how to comply with it, Rayes wrote, noting that labeling the unborn a person may constitute a homicide if they were aborted. The consequences of imprecision are potentially sweeping and severe.
U.S. District Court Judge Douglas Rayes wrote in his ruling that Arizonas law was vague and therefore deprived plaintiffs of their due process rights.
Rayes also wrote the defendants who supported it failed to show the policy would not cause injury because its impact on abortion access was unclear, especially in comparison to other state laws that were less strict.
A law is unconstitutionally vague if its application is so unclear that people of ordinary intelligence cannot figure out in advance how to comply with it, Rayes wrote, noting that labeling the unborn a person may constitute a homicide if they were aborted. The consequences of imprecision are potentially sweeping and severe.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 568 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court temporarily blocks Arizona law granting 'personhood' to fetuses (Original Post)
In It to Win It
Jul 2022
OP
Hugin
(33,164 posts)1. The vagaries starting with what is a fetus?
Diamond_Dog
(32,009 posts)2. Are you paying attention, Ohio?
delisen
(6,044 posts)3. Any activity that results in miscarriage might bring charges?
I drive a car while pregnant and have an accident, followed by miscarriage will I be charged with manslaughter by some Federalist Society District Attorney.
If the accident is deemed my fault will the charge be voluntary manslaughter?
Will physical activities while pregnant, other than housework or accompanying my husband to Mortons Steakhouse, put me in danger of homicide charges?
If there is another full human being inside of me will I be entitled to 2 votes in elections?