I walked in late to the J6 hearing. Obviously someone's voice is garbled to

[Baitball Blogger]

protect their identity. So, how they establish the relevance of their testimony, without revealing how close she or he was to the action?

[snowybirdie]

1. Twitter employee

Who monitored hate speech for them.

[zuul]

2. That's the voice of a former Twitter employee.

He wasn’t close to the action. He relayed activity on Twitter.

[blogslug]

3. That witness was a Twitter moderator

Who was monitoring traffic leading up to Jan 6 and was desperately trying to get someone to do something about the possibility of violence.

[Irish_Dem]

4. If a twitter mod knew what was going to happen, why didn't CIA/FBI/military intel know?

Or did they know and agreed with it.

[Kaleva]

7. They did know. FBI warned Capitol police prior.

[Irish_Dem]

8. But the Cap police seemed woefully unprepared.

I wonder why they didn't heed the FBI warning.

[Kaleva]

9. I don't know why the warnings went unheeded

I'm on my phone and it's not easy for me to open up other tabs to get sources

[Baitball Blogger]

5. So, people were running around with their hair on fire, but nobody was listening?

[blogslug]

6. There's so much information coming out today

Maybe I'm overdramatizing their efforts to get people to listen?