Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Constitution Isn't Working
And the Supreme Court cant fix it by itself.https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/07/congress-inaction-partisanship/670486/
https://archive.ph/daxnf
On the last day of the Supreme Courts most recent term, the Court released two cases that highlight a challenge to American democracya challenge that is the direct result of one of the Founders more consequential miscalculations. They granted Congress more power than any other branch of government, and they mistakenly thought Congress would possess a sense of institutional responsibility and authority. Instead it is largely a partisan body, drained of any sense of independent civic duty, and American democracy suffers as a result.
The two cases seem unrelated at first glance. One is West Virginia v. EPA, in which the Supreme Court struck down the Environmental Protection Agencys Obama-era clean-power rule. The Court relied on the so-called major-questions doctrine, a relatively new term for the legal idea that if Congress intends to delegate significant power to regulatory agencies to fashion new rules and regulations, it has to do so explicitly. The second case is Biden v. Texas. The Court upheld the Biden administrations decision to reverse the Trump administrations remain in Mexico policy, which required a small number of non-Mexican nationals who were detained at the border to wait in Mexico during their removal proceedings.
What do these cases have in common? They both arose from serious and problematic congressional inaction. In the EPA case, the executive branch was responding to legitimate concerns about climate change, but the executive branch is not supposed to be a lawmaking body. In the remain in Mexico case, Congress failed to fund sufficient immigration detention facilities, rendering it impossible for the president to comply with Congresss mandate that immigrants who are not clearly and beyond a reasonable doubt entitled to entry shall be detained. This left the president with the choice of releasing migrants into the country or requiring them to return to the foreign territory contiguous to the United States from which they arrived.
Article I, Section 1 of the Constitution states, All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States. With the growth of the administrative state, Congress has effectively delegated some of its legislative powers to administrative agencies, which promulgate regulations that have the force of law. For example, many of the rules that govern American immigration, environmental policy, workplace safety, and the securities industry are regulations promulgated by the executive branch, not statutes passed by Congress.
snip
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 493 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Constitution Isn't Working (Original Post)
Celerity
Jul 2022
OP
SickOfTheOnePct
(7,290 posts)1. Great article
and I agree 100%. There really is only one way to fix it, and that's for one party or the other to take such commanding control of both Houses of Congress that the other party can do little to nothing to stop laws from passing.