General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Ayres guy should be in prison !!
Hell if I broke into convenience store I'd be locked up for years, He broke into the US Capitol..
He knew it was a crime and I'm sure somebody over the last few years told him and showed proof of what trump really is but he chose to follow the lies.
Screw him and his apologies !!
Response to Beachnutt (Original post)
MarineCombatEngineer This message was self-deleted by its author.
LogicFirst
(571 posts)And she votes.
Beachnutt
(7,324 posts)I tried to get my trump loving sister to watch and she refused.
hlthe2b
(102,292 posts)Ayres agreed to plead guilty to count three of his indictment, a misdemeanor convicting him with disorderly and disruptive conduct in a restrictive building or grounds.
The sentence, because Ayres did not carry a weapon or engage in violent behavior, carries a maximum sentence of one year in prison, a fine of not more than $100,000 and a term of supervised release of not more than one year, according to court documents.
The documents, however, noted that Ayres has no prior criminal convictions and his sentencing guideline range is between no time served to six months, with an estimated applicable fine of between $2,000 and $20,000. Ayres attorney has the right to ask the court to waive any fine.
Nevilledog
(51,122 posts)Link to tweet
Amanda Marcotte
@AmandaMarcotte
·
Follow
Useful context to Stephen Ayres: In the immediate aftermath of the riot, he was trying to blame antifa for it, even though he personally went there on Trump's orders.
He is being sentenced in September. https://justice.gov/opa/page/file/1360721/download
Image
6:26 PM · Jul 12, 2022
[/divj
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)he seems to have a change of heart in the ensuing time between then and today.
Nevilledog
(51,122 posts)He needs consequences. Not only did he lie to law enforcement, he knowingly tried to implicate a group that is used by the MAGAts to justify violence.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)but that doesn't change the fact that his testimony today was pretty devastating.
Nevilledog
(51,122 posts)WheelWalker
(8,955 posts)Beachnutt
(7,324 posts)He saw the destruction and mayhem going on before he went in there he knew it was criminal.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)"Not so much".
Or was I hearing things?
Has he been sentenced? He is trying to get that reduced by giving this testimony. Does he really know that Trump lied?
I am just not sure.
Beachnutt
(7,324 posts)It was like he believes it still may have been.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)EndlessWire
(6,537 posts)He didn't listen to his lawyer! This testimony was part of his leniency deal, and his luke warm agreement was not what they wanted to hear!
He strikes me as being really ignorant. Maybe he didn't even understand the completeness of the question. You can practically see the wheels turning in his head, as he gives a noncommittal answer to a fundamental question. He might as well have said, "I believe that the election was stolen." He doesn't have the verbal skills needed to walk that fine line between agreement and denial. Maybe he counts on being able to join that group again as a made man when he gets out of prison in time for 2024.
Sky Jewels
(7,113 posts)I can't let my Nazi Bros think I'm a cucked pussy and helping the libs!
Jirel
(2,018 posts)He was that witness caught at the perfect moment - between conviction and before sentencing. All his testimony is already on the record, so perjuring himself before the committee would be the stupidest thing he could do. Plus he's super motivated to cooperate, hoping he'll get a lighter sentence.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)Keepers because he thought Bundy's standoff was so keen.
And Ayers's answer when asked if he believed tfg's election lie was, "Not as much." So, a little I guess.
Beachnutt
(7,324 posts)he says "Not so much"
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)ProfessorGAC
(65,076 posts)You're sacrifice good over the perfect.
"Not so much" is a commonly used phrase to express a negative.
It's often used to suggest a change in attitude. (I used to like Journey, but now, not so much.)
I'm not at all taking his response as ambivalence. To me, he's admitting he believed a lie & now doesn't.
Here's another example:
idiom informal. used to refer back to something that has been mentioned, saying that it is less true for someone or something else : If you like it, fine, but for me, not so much. I'm ready to start eating more healthily
Beachnutt
(7,324 posts)but thats just me...
ProfessorGAC
(65,076 posts)But, you & i both know that it's common parlance & it appears you're wasting energy on interpreting an answer that is easier taken as a "no".
EndlessWire
(6,537 posts)"Not so much" just means LESS. It is not an unequivocal "No," and YOU know this. You just want to win.
Response to Scrivener7 (Reply #10)
Beachnutt This message was self-deleted by its author.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)I watched the whole hearing and I was struck at how remorseful they were and the valuable info they imparted to the J6 committee.
You and others may feel indifference to their remorse, I, OTOH, choose to give them the benefit of the doubt because of what I witnessed on TV today.
Think about this, because of their testimony today, they are enemies to the right now and their lives and their families lives will be in danger.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)I never said ANYTHING about trusting repukes, go back and reread what I wrote.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)And this isn't the first time you've done this.
Point out where I said anything about trusting repukes.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)You can deny it all you want, I just don't give a damn.
Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)you read into it.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)Scrivener7
(50,955 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)but we don't know who else it'll have cost them.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)His, and his family's lives are forever changed, he realizes this, accepts his responsibility in his actions at the Capitol that day.
A Federal conviction, even a Federal misdemeanor conviction, is a big deal on your record.
EndlessWire
(6,537 posts)Can it be called real remorse when you agree to testimony as part of a sentencing agreement? At least the one guy had the decency to apologize to the cop whose life he helped ruin. Maybe that shows remorse.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)Was it part of his sentencing agreement? Haven't seen anything about that.
What struck me was how they were both remorseful at how they were duped into believing the RQW bullshit, and how Mr. Ayers personally apologized to the officers there at the hearing.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Fwiw, I thought his appearance made him a good example of the many who make easy (stupid) fodder for the manipulations of authoritarian leaders.
Mr. Ayres speaks of belatedly "researching," but I'm guessing he was already mostly shocked into reality by learning that "just following orders" had made him a criminal investigated by the FBI and prosecuted by the DoJ.