General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHubble v James Webb: 'The Cosmic Cliffs', Carina Nebula, 7,200 light-years [hi-res images]
Last edited Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:25 PM - Edit history (2)
Hubble Space Telescope, 2012
James Webb Space Telescope, 2022
This is only the beginning. Its beyond what we had expected its beyond our dreams, Chris Packham, Professor Astrophysics, UTSA.
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)speak easy
(9,259 posts)... a tiny absolute nothing
PJMcK
(22,037 posts)The discoveries will be awesome.
Great work, NASA!
spanone
(135,844 posts)K&R
hunter
(38,317 posts)I even like the diffraction spikes in this photo, which are an artifact inherent to the telescope's design.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction_spike
BlueSpot
(855 posts)Bright lights always look like that (with rays shooting out) to me due to astigmatism. When I saw the pictures, I started to wonder if they just really looked like that and I had been misinformed for all these years. I feel a little gaslit.
brer cat
(24,578 posts)The JWST is going to give us some awesome pictures.
3Hotdogs
(12,391 posts)"I can see clearly, now......"
ancianita
(36,095 posts)jaxexpat
(6,833 posts)These nebulae are just too modern.
ShazzieB
(16,426 posts)I'm no astrophysicist, but I know it takes a really long time for the light from those distant stars and galaxies to get to us.
ancianita
(36,095 posts)I mean, it's beautiful, but it might not even be there by now.
So how do astrophysicists know anything more about the universe? I guess it's because it can record stuff in real time, which these photos don't show. I read this book by astrophysicist Paul Sutter, in which he explains how the world of astrophysics works, and how little astrophysicists know.
It helps to hear him explain, even six months ago, how the Webb works in real time, and how it's so different from the Hubble, it's not really the Hubble's successor.
And now we find out today...
Wild blueberry
(6,636 posts)Thank you.