General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat Mr. Weissman just said on Ari's show confirms some suspicions about the DOJ.
There are many embeds still there. Garland is the AG but he is one person. It take a devoted village to do the proper investigations the the Trump insurrection calls for. I do not think that AG Garland is being served well by the FBI and the rest of the DOJ because of some layover Trumpers. I've said this early on that Garland's first act as AG was to weed out all the Trump appointees and supporters. It is a remarkable thing that one deranged individual holds so much sway over so many government employees throughout all the Executive agencies.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)If a member of The Federalist Society they are gone.
Baitball Blogger
(46,736 posts)MOMFUDSKI
(5,556 posts)and bring someone SERIOUS about their job in. I am disgusted. Or are they ALL in on making this a country of rich and poor? WTF
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)
Beastly Boy This message was self-deleted by its author.
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)
Post removed
Response to Post removed (Reply #20)
DURHAM D This message was self-deleted by its author.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)Appears to be accurate.
Edit: Checked more and now not sure but leaning toward probably.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)How about a link?
He attended some Federalist events, but there is no evidence that he's a member.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)does not make him a Federalist.
Think about it. The R's refused to confirm him when they were in control because he was NOT a Federalist. Then, when Trump was elected, that's all he appointed.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/03/us/conservative-legal-movement-roe-v-wade.html
During Barack Obamas presidency, the Federalist Society continued to mature, effectively credentialing a growing pool of movement conservatives awaiting the next Republican administration. Then in 2016, judicial appointments took on tremendous urgency when Justice Scalia died during a presidential campaign and Senate Republicans refused to give a hearing to Mr. Obamas nominee to fill the vacancy, Judge Merrick B. Garland, who is now the Biden administrations attorney general.
ancianita
(36,095 posts)ancianita
(36,095 posts)checked -- 2 Wikipedia entries, The Federalist Society, Mother Jones, The Daily Beast Twitter gives no links, just rumor -- any of them would have quickly noted his membership. They don't.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_Society#Notable_members
Where did you check?
wnylib
(21,487 posts)It is not true.
FBI Director Christopher Wray is a member of the Federalist Society.
AG Merrick Garland is not.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)This mis-information is what the repukes do, we're supposed to be better than this, and for the most part, we are.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)gab13by13
(21,360 posts)but there is no proof that Garland is an actual member.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)during Obama's tenure because they were waiting with their list of Federalist members.
gab13by13
(21,360 posts)I can look it up.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)so please provide a link on a nickname.
former9thward
(32,025 posts)He was not apporved because they wanted the chance one of their own would nominate someone who was much younger than Garland. And that is what happened.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)former9thward
(32,025 posts)They wanted a chance on someone much younger. And they got it. Obama nominated Garland because he was so old he thought the Rs would bite. They didn't.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Between 2008 and 2012 he spoke at 8 meetings as a LAWYER, not as a Federalist Society member.
https://fedsoc.org/contributors/merrick-garland
A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society.
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)But you took the bait anyway.
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)wnylib
(21,487 posts)information about a member of President Biden's cabinet.
Sneederbunk
(14,291 posts)dereliction of duty.
wnylib
(21,487 posts)Pinback
(12,157 posts)Am I missing something here? Seems like Garland can shitcan anybody not following orders, no?
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)ret5hd
(20,499 posts)malicious compliance can wreck a project in any organization.
wnylib
(21,487 posts)what somebody imagines is "really going on."
MarineCombatEngineer
(12,399 posts)brush
(53,791 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:15 PM - Edit history (1)
is being spent on the apprehending and prosecuting, with mostly light sentences IMO, on the actual idiots who battled the cops outside the building or breached the actual Capitol and trashed it.
Meanwhile, the planers, trump et al, have been escaping scrutiny for the most part. Melber and his guest Andrew Wiseman basically said that the DOJ was surprised by Cassidy Hutchinson's revelatory testimony. They also said they shouldn't have been surprised since they have way more ability for wider-anging investigations, and in fact should've interview Hutchinson long ago.
I don't know, Ali Alexander is still at lodge for God's sake.
Running a major department like that is a big job, maybe too much for a former judge who's used to focusing on cases instead of the big picture. I'd like to be proven wrong, but we've been saying this for months now.
Captain Zero
(6,811 posts)Typo? Or ?
Makes no sense to me.
brush
(53,791 posts)You haven't heard of him?
"Ali Alexander is an American far-right activist, social media personality, and conspiracy theorist. Alexander is an organizer of Stop the Steal, a campaign to promote the false conspiracy theory that widespread voter fraud..."
https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?hspart=pty&hsimp=yhs-ext-ff_freetestnow¶m1=20210829¶m2=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000¶m3=speedtest_~US~appfocus1~¶m4=~firefox~~&type=yhs-ext-ff_freetestnow_appfocus1_ff&grd=1&p=cluseau+of+the+pin+pather&guccounter=1
BumRushDaShow
(129,100 posts)He testified at a federal grand jury a couple weeks ago - https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/politics/stop-the-steal-ali-alexander-testifies-january-6-grand-jury/index.html
He was indicted for seditious conspiracy and the group of them (including Rhodes) were scheduled for trial on Sept. 26.
brush
(53,791 posts)BumRushDaShow
(129,100 posts)given there has been so much going on. In fact, that grand jury testimony happened the same day Roe v Wade was overturned (surprise surprise).
wnylib
(21,487 posts)that Garland bashers have not yet heard.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,624 posts)Garland, Monaco, US attorney for DC Graves, and the lead investigator (dont recall their name at the moment) are all Biden appointees/ Biden era hires, and they are the ones who will call the shot and decide if Trump and his co conspirators will be prosecuted.
In addition, DOJ has hired over a hundred new attorneys/investigators for J6.
So, yes, there are some Trump appointees still at DOJ, but there is no evidence to support the assumption that they are slow walking or obstructing anything related to the J6 investigations.
The Trumpers could be working out of the Anchorage field office for all we know.
Justice matters.
(6,933 posts)The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) of 1970 seeks to strengthen the legal tools in evidence gathering by establishing new penal prohibitions and providing enhanced sanctions and new remedies for dealing with the unlawful activities of those engaged in organized crime.
Threats of violence across multiple States. Witness tampering still not addressed.
So, when ... (?)
The longer the obvious racket of lies and threats continues without accountability, the more the danger to human lives keeps on growing.
getagrip_already
(14,764 posts)Tfg purged the doj of suspect employees. Not appointees, but staff. Then they stuffed their own hires in.
An appointed rosecutor or fbi appointee needs a staff to function. Even at the fbi, The fbi staffers and agents aren't appointed, they are permanent employees.
That has an impact.
BumRushDaShow
(129,100 posts)As a former federal supervisor, the Civil Service Act makes it very difficult to fire Civil Service employees - including those who are literally "not all there" (and even stalker types). You have to produce a shitload of documentation and hope they don't just move the "problem child" somewhere else.
So if any "purge" went on, it may have been of the previous "excepted service" appointees (e.g., aides, etc., not needing any Senate confirmation) working for the Obama appointees or associated a GS-1000s (SES) a couple layers down who got reassigned.
One of the issues of concern was "converting" some of them to regular civil service in order to "embed" and it was rumored that this was happening during the half-assed transition, when OPM was also attempting to reclassify a big pile of job series as a new "Schedule F" that would allow quick firing.
Pepsidog
(6,254 posts)name and pave their way to hire office.
gab13by13
(21,360 posts)live love laugh
(13,118 posts)867-5309.
(1,189 posts)You're dreaming up excuses.