Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Samrob

(4,298 posts)
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 06:41 PM Jul 2022

What Mr. Weissman just said on Ari's show confirms some suspicions about the DOJ.

There are many embeds still there. Garland is the AG but he is one person. It take a devoted village to do the proper investigations the the Trump insurrection calls for. I do not think that AG Garland is being served well by the FBI and the rest of the DOJ because of some layover Trumpers. I've said this early on that Garland's first act as AG was to weed out all the Trump appointees and supporters. It is a remarkable thing that one deranged individual holds so much sway over so many government employees throughout all the Executive agencies.

49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What Mr. Weissman just said on Ari's show confirms some suspicions about the DOJ. (Original Post) Samrob Jul 2022 OP
It would be simple to purge DOJ. DURHAM D Jul 2022 #1
+1 Baitball Blogger Jul 2022 #3
Time to fire garland MOMFUDSKI Jul 2022 #6
This message was self-deleted by its author Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #8
Sure. So which ones on the list work for DOJ? Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #10
Post removed Post removed Jul 2022 #20
This message was self-deleted by its author DURHAM D Jul 2022 #21
The person you responded to gave no evidence. I wouldn't believe them without some. n/t pnwmom Jul 2022 #22
I checked. DURHAM D Jul 2022 #27
You checked? MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #29
No, he's NOT. Just moderating a panel at a legal conference sponsored by the Federalist Society pnwmom Jul 2022 #31
+1 Exactly. ancianita Jul 2022 #43
It is not accurate. He's not listed as a member of the Federalist Society on any of six sites I've ancianita Jul 2022 #41
You did not know that for a good reason. wnylib Jul 2022 #30
Thank You!!!! MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #34
And you know that how? n/t pnwmom Jul 2022 #23
Garland appeared at 10 Federalist Society events gab13by13 Jul 2022 #24
That means nothing. What does mean something is that the R's refused to approve him pnwmom Jul 2022 #33
He got a nickname for attending so many Meetings, gab13by13 Jul 2022 #37
I just did, and there's nothing I can find on any nickname, MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #39
That is not the reason he was not approved. former9thward Jul 2022 #45
If he had been in the Federalist Society they would have confirmed him. But he wasn't. nt pnwmom Jul 2022 #46
No they would not have confirmed him. former9thward Jul 2022 #47
Garland's not a member of the Federalist Society. Bottom line. pnwmom Jul 2022 #49
He is not. Beastly Boy Jul 2022 #26
BULLSHIT!!!! nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #28
No, he is not. You are spreading false, negative wnylib Jul 2022 #32
The fact the DOJ did not speak with Cassie Hutchinson is Sneederbunk Jul 2022 #2
Is that a fact? What is your source? wnylib Jul 2022 #35
How can a DOJ employee get away with disobeying a direct order? Pinback Jul 2022 #4
Yeah, this is just another bash the DoJ/AG Garland thread. MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #5
Everything from "just doing a bad job" to... ret5hd Jul 2022 #12
So can unfounded claims about wnylib Jul 2022 #36
+100. nt MarineCombatEngineer Jul 2022 #38
Also it seems too much of the DOJ's capability and time... brush Jul 2022 #7
Ali Alexander still at lodge? What Mean? Captain Zero Jul 2022 #11
He's the one who helped organized the J6 rally, along with Gosar, Biggs and others. brush Jul 2022 #13
"I don't know, Ali Alexander is still at lodge, and running a major department'" BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #15
Now that's good to hear. Thank you. I hadn't heard that. brush Jul 2022 #17
That was a new update for me as well BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #19
I think that there is probably a lot wnylib Jul 2022 #40
Nonsense- all the DOJ leadership are Biden appointees Fiendish Thingy Jul 2022 #9
RICO case: $250+ Million racket across multiple States Justice matters. Jul 2022 #14
And their staffs? getagrip_already Jul 2022 #16
"Tfg purged the doj of suspect employees. Not appointees," BumRushDaShow Jul 2022 #18
Making me wish for the days when a DOJ attorney wanted to take down a prominent politician to make a Pepsidog Jul 2022 #25
Here it is, gab13by13 Jul 2022 #42
The endless chiding about DOJ made it obvious to me. live love laugh Jul 2022 #44
Then why have so many of the grunts been prosected? 867-5309. Jul 2022 #48

MOMFUDSKI

(5,556 posts)
6. Time to fire garland
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 06:55 PM
Jul 2022

and bring someone SERIOUS about their job in. I am disgusted. Or are they ALL in on making this a country of rich and poor? WTF

Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)

Response to DURHAM D (Reply #1)

Response to Post removed (Reply #20)

DURHAM D

(32,610 posts)
27. I checked.
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:12 PM
Jul 2022

Appears to be accurate.

Edit: Checked more and now not sure but leaning toward probably.

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,399 posts)
29. You checked?
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:15 PM
Jul 2022

How about a link?

He attended some Federalist events, but there is no evidence that he's a member.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
31. No, he's NOT. Just moderating a panel at a legal conference sponsored by the Federalist Society
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:20 PM
Jul 2022

does not make him a Federalist.

Think about it. The R's refused to confirm him when they were in control because he was NOT a Federalist. Then, when Trump was elected, that's all he appointed.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/03/us/conservative-legal-movement-roe-v-wade.html

During Barack Obama’s presidency, the Federalist Society continued to mature, effectively credentialing a growing pool of movement conservatives awaiting the next Republican administration. Then in 2016, judicial appointments took on tremendous urgency when Justice Scalia died during a presidential campaign and Senate Republicans refused to give a hearing to Mr. Obama’s nominee to fill the vacancy, Judge Merrick B. Garland, who is now the Biden administration’s attorney general.

ancianita

(36,095 posts)
41. It is not accurate. He's not listed as a member of the Federalist Society on any of six sites I've
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:39 PM
Jul 2022

checked -- 2 Wikipedia entries, The Federalist Society, Mother Jones, The Daily Beast Twitter gives no links, just rumor -- any of them would have quickly noted his membership. They don't.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_Society#Notable_members

Where did you check?

wnylib

(21,487 posts)
30. You did not know that for a good reason.
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:18 PM
Jul 2022

It is not true.

FBI Director Christopher Wray is a member of the Federalist Society.

AG Merrick Garland is not.

MarineCombatEngineer

(12,399 posts)
34. Thank You!!!!
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:22 PM
Jul 2022

This mis-information is what the repukes do, we're supposed to be better than this, and for the most part, we are.

gab13by13

(21,360 posts)
24. Garland appeared at 10 Federalist Society events
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:10 PM
Jul 2022

but there is no proof that Garland is an actual member.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
33. That means nothing. What does mean something is that the R's refused to approve him
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:22 PM
Jul 2022

during Obama's tenure because they were waiting with their list of Federalist members.

former9thward

(32,025 posts)
45. That is not the reason he was not approved.
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 12:20 AM
Jul 2022

He was not apporved because they wanted the chance one of their own would nominate someone who was much younger than Garland. And that is what happened.

former9thward

(32,025 posts)
47. No they would not have confirmed him.
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 12:34 AM
Jul 2022

They wanted a chance on someone much younger. And they got it. Obama nominated Garland because he was so old he thought the Rs would bite. They didn't.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
49. Garland's not a member of the Federalist Society. Bottom line.
Wed Jul 13, 2022, 12:37 AM
Jul 2022

Between 2008 and 2012 he spoke at 8 meetings as a LAWYER, not as a Federalist Society member.

https://fedsoc.org/contributors/merrick-garland

A person listed as a contributor has spoken or otherwise participated in Federalist Society events, publications, or multimedia presentations. A person's appearance on this list does not imply any other endorsement or relationship between the person and the Federalist Society.

wnylib

(21,487 posts)
32. No, he is not. You are spreading false, negative
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:21 PM
Jul 2022

information about a member of President Biden's cabinet.

Pinback

(12,157 posts)
4. How can a DOJ employee get away with disobeying a direct order?
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 06:51 PM
Jul 2022

Am I missing something here? Seems like Garland can shitcan anybody not following orders, no?

ret5hd

(20,499 posts)
12. Everything from "just doing a bad job" to...
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 07:32 PM
Jul 2022

“malicious compliance” can wreck a project in any organization.

brush

(53,791 posts)
7. Also it seems too much of the DOJ's capability and time...
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 07:07 PM
Jul 2022

Last edited Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:15 PM - Edit history (1)

is being spent on the apprehending and prosecuting, with mostly light sentences IMO, on the actual idiots who battled the cops outside the building or breached the actual Capitol and trashed it.

Meanwhile, the planers, trump et al, have been escaping scrutiny for the most part. Melber and his guest Andrew Wiseman basically said that the DOJ was surprised by Cassidy Hutchinson's revelatory testimony. They also said they shouldn't have been surprised since they have way more ability for wider-anging investigations, and in fact should've interview Hutchinson long ago.

I don't know, Ali Alexander is still at lodge for God's sake.

Running a major department like that is a big job, maybe too much for a former judge who's used to focusing on cases instead of the big picture. I'd like to be proven wrong, but we've been saying this for months now.

brush

(53,791 posts)
13. He's the one who helped organized the J6 rally, along with Gosar, Biggs and others.
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 07:46 PM
Jul 2022

You haven't heard of him?

"Ali Alexander is an American far-right activist, social media personality, and conspiracy theorist. Alexander is an organizer of Stop the Steal, a campaign to promote the false conspiracy theory that widespread voter fraud..."

https://search.yahoo.com/yhs/search?hspart=pty&hsimp=yhs-ext-ff_freetestnow¶m1=20210829¶m2=00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000¶m3=speedtest_~US~appfocus1~¶m4=~firefox~~&type=yhs-ext-ff_freetestnow_appfocus1_ff&grd=1&p=cluseau+of+the+pin+pather&guccounter=1

BumRushDaShow

(129,100 posts)
15. "I don't know, Ali Alexander is still at lodge, and running a major department'"
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:10 PM
Jul 2022

He testified at a federal grand jury a couple weeks ago - https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/24/politics/stop-the-steal-ali-alexander-testifies-january-6-grand-jury/index.html

He was indicted for seditious conspiracy and the group of them (including Rhodes) were scheduled for trial on Sept. 26.

BumRushDaShow

(129,100 posts)
19. That was a new update for me as well
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:37 PM
Jul 2022

given there has been so much going on. In fact, that grand jury testimony happened the same day Roe v Wade was overturned (surprise surprise).

Fiendish Thingy

(15,624 posts)
9. Nonsense- all the DOJ leadership are Biden appointees
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 07:26 PM
Jul 2022

Garland, Monaco, US attorney for DC Graves, and the lead investigator (don’t recall their name at the moment) are all Biden appointees/ Biden era hires, and they are the ones who will call the shot and decide if Trump and his co conspirators will be prosecuted.

In addition, DOJ has hired over a hundred new attorneys/investigators for J6.

So, yes, there are some Trump appointees still at DOJ, but there is no evidence to support the assumption that they are slow walking or obstructing anything related to the J6 investigations.

The Trumpers could be working out of the Anchorage field office for all we know.

Justice matters.

(6,933 posts)
14. RICO case: $250+ Million racket across multiple States
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 07:51 PM
Jul 2022

The Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) of 1970 seeks to strengthen the legal tools in evidence gathering by establishing new penal prohibitions and providing enhanced sanctions and new remedies for dealing with the unlawful activities of those engaged in organized crime.

Threats of violence across multiple States. Witness tampering still not addressed.
So, when ... (?)

The longer the obvious racket of lies and threats continues without accountability, the more the danger to human lives keeps on growing.

getagrip_already

(14,764 posts)
16. And their staffs?
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:15 PM
Jul 2022

Tfg purged the doj of suspect employees. Not appointees, but staff. Then they stuffed their own hires in.

An appointed rosecutor or fbi appointee needs a staff to function. Even at the fbi, The fbi staffers and agents aren't appointed, they are permanent employees.

That has an impact.

BumRushDaShow

(129,100 posts)
18. "Tfg purged the doj of suspect employees. Not appointees,"
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 08:34 PM
Jul 2022

As a former federal supervisor, the Civil Service Act makes it very difficult to fire Civil Service employees - including those who are literally "not all there" (and even stalker types). You have to produce a shitload of documentation and hope they don't just move the "problem child" somewhere else.

So if any "purge" went on, it may have been of the previous "excepted service" appointees (e.g., aides, etc., not needing any Senate confirmation) working for the Obama appointees or associated a GS-1000s (SES) a couple layers down who got reassigned.

One of the issues of concern was "converting" some of them to regular civil service in order to "embed" and it was rumored that this was happening during the half-assed transition, when OPM was also attempting to reclassify a big pile of job series as a new "Schedule F" that would allow quick firing.

Pepsidog

(6,254 posts)
25. Making me wish for the days when a DOJ attorney wanted to take down a prominent politician to make a
Tue Jul 12, 2022, 09:10 PM
Jul 2022

name and pave their way to hire office.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What Mr. Weissman just sa...