General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo the woman haters are on a roll. Can mandatory FGM* be far behind?
*Female Genital Mutilation, for those unfamiliar with this insane practice, which, by the way, DOES happen in this country.
??
Bettie
(16,133 posts)And yeah, who knows what these dickheads have in mind, but I would guess that is farther down the road, but it's a stop they will likely make.
Srkdqltr
(6,349 posts)Stupid people
jmowreader
(50,567 posts)perpetuated by people whose religion says sex is only for reproduction. It stands for Female Genital Mutilation, and there are four kinds - each more horrid than the last. (I had to edit this because Im not sure how detailed you can get in describing FGM without running into DUs no-sex-threads rule.)
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Irish_Dem
(47,546 posts)Refusing to treat female medical emergencies will result in some having permanent
damage to reproductive organs.
niyad
(113,640 posts)labia and clitoris, sewing the labia together, and on and on.
Irish_Dem
(47,546 posts)I was just pointing that there will be other kinds of damage to women's reproductive organs.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,472 posts)Christian white supremacy.
niyad
(113,640 posts)Patriarchy.
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)
are intimidated by and fear strong, confident women. Thus, they want to subjugate them - which looks like hatred. I think its important to make that distinction to understand and combat this insanity.
For many of them, religion is just a convenient way to justify that goal. They profess to be Christians, but they keep whipping out the Old Testament as a basis for their actions.
Delmette2.0
(4,174 posts)Thank you
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)when I've read news accounts of the practice.
Didn't even know it was an Asian thing at all. Not saying it's NOT but I don't associate it with Asian culture particularly, and I'm guessing most people do not
Anyways, it's horrible and disgusting, wherever it happens.
Except when it happens to infant males. Nobody cares much about that.
Apparently the inane scribblings of Bronze-Age nomads ... makes it okay.
niyad
(113,640 posts)GENITAL MUTILATION.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)Maybe I'm just not a fan of MALE INFANT GENITAL MUTILATION (BECAUSE MINE WERE AND I WISH THEY WEREN'T) ... as opposed to 'comparing' the two as if they're exactly alike.
I did NOT do that, it was just an opportunity to soapbox for something that bugs me that's RELATED.
niyad
(113,640 posts)infant male circumcision compares with having the labia and clitoris removed, what remains of the folds sewn together, the endless infections, fistulas, and death, etc.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)And I never meant to imply otherwise.
But they're related in the sense that:
1) Young people's genitals have bits cut off of them in both cases, and
2) Those young people didn't consent having bits cut off their genitals, and
3) In both cases, the inane scribblings of Bronze-Age nomads in the Middle East ... are used to explain why it's okay (or possibly even mandated, in some religions).
If you really can't see why one reminds me of the other, I don't know what to tell you.
One is WAY worse, sure ... but they're related enough that one ... makes me think of the other.
Sue me if you don't like it
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)Youre still disfiguring a sex organ and reducing the ability to enjoy sexual pleasure against ones consent
niyad
(113,640 posts)to read up on it.
Hugh_Lebowski
(33,643 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Which the OP did not specify.
That type of mutilation is more to some Muslim practices.
I think Asian countries stopped crippling girls and women with foot binding generations ago.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)niyad
(113,640 posts)whathehell
(29,100 posts)As referenced by WhiskeyGrinder, FGM is NOT part of Western Judeo- Christian culture and it's about as likely to be legalized here as in Great Britain, where it's ALSO a problem. Stop with the hyperbole and alarmism already.
Treefrog
(4,170 posts)Sensible post.
whathehell
(29,100 posts)Mosby
(16,388 posts)It became popular after WW2 when leaders became more ecumenical in their outlook due to the threat of Marxism and Communism. There wasn't a hell of a lot of real religious pluralism at the time.
Eta I agree with you about fmg, but the RW are clearly trying to regress to point where women and girls are property.
whathehell
(29,100 posts)it is valid for reasons lying beyond "political"
consideration.. It reflects the histories and commonalities of the two -- They are linked.
niyad
(113,640 posts)promulgating right now, and the absolutely insane crap that has been floating in the reuchwing fir decades, do you actually see a limit on their lust for power over women? Where will they draw the line? When will they be satisfied?
whathehell
(29,100 posts)for the reasons already cited..
Again, FMG has NO historical precedent in this country, or in western culture generally. It has absolutely no political or cultural constituency. Suggesting it as a natural progression from the overturning of Roe is facile in the extreme.
Sympthsical
(9,142 posts)Which was a pretty shitty time, because it felt like homophobia was being nationalized in an organized way it hadn't before.
Anyway, being a young whippersnapper heavily involved in activism, it was no fun.
Less fun were other people I worked with in the movement were screaming at everyone that Bush was planning to send us all to FEMA camps. Yes, FMA was bad, but what were we going to do about these camps?!
Turns out I did not, in fact, get relocated to Idaho.
But these people seemed to think it was coming and were very exercised about it.
The moral of the story: Reality is bad enough. We need not these kinds of embellishments to be sufficiently horrified.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)They will look the other way.
whathehell
(29,100 posts)Last edited Tue Jul 19, 2022, 04:50 PM - Edit history (1)
Unlike resrictions on abortion there is NO history of acceptance for FMG..It a very different issue than abortion.
Lancero
(3,016 posts)So... Yeah.
https://archive.ph/P01qE
onenote
(42,794 posts)onenote
(42,794 posts)Willing to bet?
There are serious issues to be concerned about. Nonsense like this is just a distraction and makes the things that are being done seem less concerning.
Hugin
(33,222 posts)Psychiatrists.
When less than 8% of the most religiously insane people take over the train. Watch out!
Srkdqltr
(6,349 posts)Is another with absolutely no context. People who complain about it are laughed at and ignored.
niyad
(113,640 posts)planetc
(7,847 posts)I was confident you'd remind me what that meant, and I would understand. Thanks, Niyad!
Joinfortmill
(14,486 posts)niyad
(113,640 posts)Aristus
(66,481 posts)That's, like, the stupidest thing I ever heard in my life! How utterly depraved does a guy have to be to insist to the point of genital mutilation that a woman not enjoy sex?
And the women who go along with it when cutting up their young female family members? "Well, we've just always done it this way. It's our tradition. It's our culture. And if you die from infection or blood loss? Well, remember: tradition and culture!"
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)And for a woman to enjoy sex it would have to be with someone else.
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)
on it for religious purposes. Its the father. I think the rationale is that if sex is not pleasurable, his horny teenage daughter will not seek it out and thereby spoil her virginity before marriage. Its REALLY fucked up.
Why didnt their all powerful god just leave that part off the women folk? Problem solved, right? I mean, why put a button there if its not supposed to be pushed?
Aristus
(66,481 posts)"I'm not marrying her if you've cut her up. I don't want to marry into such inhumane savagery."
Whiskeytide
(4,463 posts)
the woman you fall in love with. Hardly seems fair to her, right?
And besides, a father that screwed up would likely say good - I didnt want her to marry a non-believer anyway.
Its barbaric. Religious barbarism. It should be punished in the extreme.
Aristus
(66,481 posts)I don't know how this problem is going to be solved without men standing up and saying 'no more'. And women standing up and saying 'To hell with tradition! This is savagery, pure and simple!'
atreides1
(16,100 posts)You are of course including the enslaved women who are eager allies to the men seeking control?
niyad
(113,640 posts)whathehell
(29,100 posts)It is absutely NOT part of Western culture, which includes Britain, of course, and when it happens here -- and there -- it happens illegally.
.
niyad
(113,640 posts)this country, the ongoing attempts to control women's sexuality and autonomy, the absolute hatred for women, I don't think it that unrealistic. The fact that FGM is currently illegal in both Great Britain and here does not stop the practice.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Its on their agenda.
niyad
(113,640 posts)ANY Bible
J_William_Ryan
(1,760 posts)In traditional cultures it is immoral for a woman to enjoy sex; indeed, women shouldnt enjoy sex because to do so would render her a slut or a whore and foment sexual lust and desire, promiscuity, infidelity, fornication, and destroy the foundations of both families and society.
And yes, this does sound like the Christo-fascist American right.
niyad
(113,640 posts)Runningdawg
(4,526 posts)niyad
(113,640 posts)Runningdawg
(4,526 posts)niyad
(113,640 posts)the current christofascist court and all the crazies in the various legislatures. If you have been watching the reichwingcrazies for the last few decades, you know that their rhetoric and hatred are unbounded.
Runningdawg
(4,526 posts)And as much as I despise the MAGAts with every breath, you start cutting on kids and watch how fast we shut that shit down.
ecstatic
(32,752 posts)Remember all the hell we raised about babies in cages and families being separated? Or how about when Americans witnessed a man being choked to death on video? What was done about that? And the terrorist attack on the Capitol last year? Anything?
I'm glad you're still hopeful. I'm desperately trying to draw inspiration from you and others who are. I have NOT seen any evidence that Americans are going to stand up to what the GOP is doing. Women are literally dying right now because of the inhumane anti-healthcare laws flooding the South. All I'm hearing is talk about inflation and gas prices.
Runningdawg
(4,526 posts)is something I expect to hear from the MAGAts. And it WILL NOT help women in their current situation.
niyad
(113,640 posts)and assorted loons. I have been watching the reichwingcrazies for decades. The crap they were spewing years ago that people dismissed as too far out are either happening, or the calls are getting louder and more insistent.
Runningdawg
(4,526 posts)I know exactly what they have planned and you are right. It IS here and now. They aren't interested in mutilation, killing is much more efficient. They haven't been forcing their boys into the military since Vietnam to learn mutilation.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)IcyPeas
(21,922 posts)I recommend this book: Possessing the Secret of Joy for anyone not familiar with FGM. It's a novel I will never forget.
In Tashis tribe, the Olinka, young girls undergo female genital mutilation as an initiation into the community. Tashi manages to avoid this fate at first, but when pressed by tribal leaders, she submits. Years later, married and living in America as Evelyn Johnson, Tashis inner pain emerges. As she questions why such a terrifying, disfiguring sacrifice was required, she sorts through the many levels of subjugation with which shes been burdened over the years.
In Possessing the Secret of Joy, Alice Walker exposes the abhorrent practice of female genital mutilation in an unforgettable, moving novel.
niyad
(113,640 posts)onenote
(42,794 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Raine
(30,541 posts)get a grip!
niyad
(113,640 posts)thanks anyway.
Raine
(30,541 posts)no excuse for it.
niyad
(113,640 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,258 posts)Brenda
(1,076 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)between the Ds and the Rs.
ecstatic
(32,752 posts)Way too many replies to this thread for something with an easy answer.
niyad
(113,640 posts)are planning to draw the line on their desire to completely subjugate us.
Between here __________________
and here ____________________
niyad
(113,640 posts)Baggies
(503 posts)As pushback goes, having read several other posters regarding your post, saying No was extremely mild. Extremely mild.
Count your blessings.
niyad
(113,640 posts)Interesting that a newcomer (?) engages in such tactics.