General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI was pleased to learn that this evening's coverage of the hearing on MSNBC
will not feature commentary by Andrea Mitchell.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,756 posts)Anyone else is fine with me.
2naSalit
(86,822 posts)Might be a demand of Maddow's. If I were her, I'd have been fed up with those two, in particular, several years ago.
Sucha NastyWoman
(2,756 posts)She is historically important for womens progress in journalism. I think Andrea just stayed a bit too long.
Hekate
(90,845 posts)Its just that, unfortunately, we all get old, and she needs to have a grand retirement party about now, complete with cake and awards and speeches.
ificandream
(9,399 posts)She's had a great career in journalism. We all get older. People need to leave her alone. This is the type of stuff the lowlifes at Fox do. We shouldn't give them fuel to feed on. I also get perturbed about the comments on Chuck Todd. ANYONE on MSNBC is better than the grub dividing our country and spreading misinformation every day on Fox. We need to keep that in mind. Fox is your real enemy, not MSNBC.
calimary
(81,519 posts)We see Andrea Mitchell differently, my friend.
We both agree shes had an absolutely stellar career, and worked hard at it. But shes beyond the realistic end of it, and as she ages, I notice some increasingly glaring problems.
She gets messed up more easily now, sounding addled, losing her place in her copy or in what she was trying to adlib. Its starting to look bad and make HER look bad.
I would love to see her make a grand exit with maybe a special retrospective of her work at NBC News, so she goes out celebrated, gracefully, head held high, and nobody has to see an increasingly uncomfortable slow-walk decline.
llmart
(15,556 posts)That ship has sailed. I used to respect her, but she's forgotten the part about being an unbiased journalist.
Ocelot II
(115,878 posts)with her age; I've found her annoying for decades. Yes, she's better than anybody on Fox, but that's a low bar.
msfiddlestix
(7,286 posts)Hekate
(90,845 posts)Im with you shes had a great and pioneering career in journalism. I dont agree with a lot of what she says these days, and I do think shes diminished but I dont like to see her reviled as though she just showed up, somebody handed her the job and shes never been anything else.
2naSalit
(86,822 posts)Staying past her prime was damaging. I was never a fan of hers, other women of that era, sure but her, not so much.
catbyte
(34,471 posts)Shame on her for that. It's a huge stain on an otherwise distinguished career.
LisaM
(27,842 posts)There was absolutely no excuse for that clear bias. I simply did not understand it. She was not the only one to be unfair to HRC, but I expected better from a fellow trailblazer.
MadLinguist
(790 posts)MOMFUDSKI
(5,696 posts)Mad. Great news. Enjoy the nite you guys.
MOMFUDSKI
(5,696 posts)Mad. Great news. Enjoy the nite you guys.
Just_Vote_Dem
(2,820 posts)brooklynite
(94,757 posts)Ocelot II
(115,878 posts)paleotn
(17,989 posts)gab13by13
(21,418 posts)he just insinuated on his show that Tony Ornato was the only SS bad egg.
Just_Vote_Dem
(2,820 posts)Response to Just_Vote_Dem (Reply #11)
Ocelot II This message was self-deleted by its author.
Just_Vote_Dem
(2,820 posts)And i just got new glasses
Kingofalldems
(38,489 posts)Both sides-er extraordinaire. Said we needed to listen to the Tea Party among other things. Also thinks he knows just about everything.
ificandream
(9,399 posts)ashredux
(2,609 posts)wnylib
(21,640 posts)No both siderism there.
jaxexpat
(6,860 posts)I think it's her need to remain believable which she perhaps thinks requires facts to be accompanied by other-side-does-things-too-ism. But more to fault Democrats than to illuminate the faults of the GOP.
BlackOpz
(13 posts)ShazzieB
(16,541 posts)The panel doing the January 6 hearing recaps has never included Andrea Mitchell or Chuck Todd.
Going to Canada
(169 posts)This is like something we have collectively never experienced! Holding these people accountable! Chills!
ificandream
(9,399 posts)This was posted on another thread. Maybe some of you missed it. Hint: They're not talking about Andrea Mitchell.
https://pressgazette.co.uk/fox-news-newsguard/
Fox News 'fails to adhere to basic journalistic standards', says credibility rater Newsguard
Source: The Press Gazette
By Bron Maher
Fox News credibility score has been downgraded to red by media watchdog Newsguard, meaning it fails to adhere to several basic journalistic standards.
Fox has had an overall passing score since the ratings agency launched in 2018. (Disclosure: the author of this story, Bron Maher, was formerly a Newsguard employee.)
Newsguard garnered headlines in early 2019 for giving a red rating to Mail Online that rating was shortly reversed, and the site now sports a green rating.
Fox had already failed one major criteria gathers and presents information responsibly prior to 18 July, when the rating was downgraded.
Rebl2
(13,571 posts)I have been watching it on ABC. Refuse to watch NBC or MSNBC if Mitchell is on.