Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,824 posts)
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:05 PM Jul 2022

Antiabortion Democrat Henry Cuellar Is Now Seeking to Gut Labor Rights

Antiabortion Democrat Henry Cuellar Is Now Seeking to Gut Labor Rights

BY Liza Featherstone

Henry Cuellar, the conservative, antiabortion Democratic congressman — who Nancy Pelosi called a “fighter for hardworking families” — has shocked the labor movement with a radical bill seeking to eviscerate workers’ rights.

https://jacobin.com/2022/07/antiabortion-democrat-henry-cuellar-worker-flexibility-choice-act/

"SNIP.......

Representative Henry Cuellar, one of the most conservative Democrats in the House, has introduced a bill eviscerating labor rights that would make the Koch brothers proud.

Cuellar’s bill bears a gaslighting moniker: the Worker Flexibility and Choice Act — joining the Clear Skies Act and the Class Action Fairness Act in the annals of bills whose names are the exact opposite of their actual intent.

Cosponsored with Trumpian Republican Congresswomen Elise Stefanik and Michelle Steel, the bill creates whole new ways for employers to get out of paying minimum wage and overtime, extending the gig economy’s stress and chaos to millions more workers. As employment law professor Veena Dubal of University of California Hastings Law put it on Twitter, this bill would “make earning a living nearly impossible” for workers without bargaining power.

......SNIP"

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Antiabortion Democrat Henry Cuellar Is Now Seeking to Gut Labor Rights (Original Post) applegrove Jul 2022 OP
Your post has no sourcing... brooklynite Jul 2022 #1
Did he introduce the bill as described or not? FoxNewsSucks Jul 2022 #5
I have no idea; do you? brooklynite Jul 2022 #9
I posted on this 4 days ago, with no Jacobin links, and I included the bill links Celerity Jul 2022 #14
It takes me a while to get the whole thread up including links as I am on my cellphone. applegrove Jul 2022 #7
There have been other OPs on this event that have been sourced. Autumn Aug 2022 #20
I'm not a big fan of Cuellar, but I'd take commentary from Jacobin with a grain of salt. Ocelot II Jul 2022 #2
Ditto brooklynite Jul 2022 #3
Jacobin isn't just left-leaning, it's tipped all the way over. Ocelot II Jul 2022 #4
Did he introduce such a bill? FoxNewsSucks Jul 2022 #6
I posted the bill links 4 days ago Celerity Aug 2022 #17
How about the National Employment Law Project? Sympthsical Jul 2022 #8
Sources are important because a source's bias can influence its accuracy. Ocelot II Jul 2022 #11
Jacobin is not that extreme of a source AZProgressive Jul 2022 #12
So what? Sympthsical Aug 2022 #16
I posted on this 4 days ago, before the Jacobin story (I do not post Jacobin links) Celerity Jul 2022 #10
There is no chance of this bill passing...so who cares? I mean I don't care for the guy...just Demsrule86 Jul 2022 #13
well, even the posturing of trying to bin minimum wage and OT pay for a shedload of workers is Celerity Aug 2022 #15
Really sad when a long time Dem becomes a Republican greenjar_01 Aug 2022 #18
Reagan used to be an FDR Democrat in the 30s and 40s. no_hypocrisy Aug 2022 #19

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
5. Did he introduce the bill as described or not?
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:26 PM
Jul 2022

Shouldn't your outrage be directed at an anti-labor bill and not the poster who put out the info?

brooklynite

(94,751 posts)
9. I have no idea; do you?
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:42 PM
Jul 2022

The JACOBIN article didn’t provide a link to the supposed legislation. My point, as other observed, is that JACOBIN WRITES in a fairly polemic style.

Celerity

(43,573 posts)
14. I posted on this 4 days ago, with no Jacobin links, and I included the bill links
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:52 PM
Jul 2022
Thu Jul 28, 2022, 10:07 AM

Henry Cuellar partners w/ ultra MAGAt Elise Stefanik on Bill to strip away minimum wage & OT from many workers.

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216977382

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1552294858840330246.html



TERRIFYING: The text of @RepCuellar's bill the Workplace Flexibility & Choice Act is available.

It would carve workers out of min wage & OT protections -- not just app-deployed workers -- ANY WORKER whose employer...
1/

https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/8442/text

Decided that they would set schedules using algorithms & incentives instead of providing secure hours WOULD NO LONGER HAVE TO PROVIDE A WAGE FLOOR or OVERTIME. 2/

Employers have been trying to get of the minimum wage for a century so they can squeeze more labor out of each human. For workers w/o bargaining power (non-union workers, workers of color, low-wage workers) this bill would make earning a living nearly impossible. 3/

As Uber, DoorDash, and Instacart have already done to their workforce, it would empower employers to force workers to work long and hard to eek out a living. The everyday gamble, insecurity, & stress of gig work would extend beyond these sectors... 4/

And all in the false name of flexibility. We know Uber driving is not flexible like they pretend it is -- there is nothing flexible about making so little that you have to eat, sleep, and work in your car to provide for your family. 5/

This bill is unconscionable. It is an outrage. It would increase economic inequality--especially racialized inequality. We must rise up against this tech-capital driven DYSTOPIA. Workers should have secure, living wages AND real time flexibility. Let's legislate for THAT. 6/END.











STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO THE INTRODUCTION OF THE WORKER FLEXIBILITY AND CHOICE ACT

https://www.nelp.org/news-releases/statement-in-response-to-the-introduction-of-the-worker-flexibility-and-choice-act/

Following is a statement from Rebecca Dixon, executive director of the National Employment Law Project, on the introduction of the Worker Flexibility and Choice Act (H.R. 8442):

Earlier this week, backed by the corporate lobby group the Coalition for Workforce Innovation (CWI), which was established to fight against growing workers’ movements, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY), Congresswoman Michelle Steel (R-CA), and Congressman Henry Cuellar (D-TX) introduced the deceptively named Worker Flexibility and Choice Act (WFCA).

This bill would radically erode fundamental worker protections in the United States to the benefit of big corporations, allowing them to require workers to sign away basic rights as a condition of work. The bill would also establish a second-tier employment class of disproportionately Black and immigrant workers working in arduous and underpaid jobs without minimum labor protections — growing poverty and racialized economic inequality.

The bill seeks to codify the false choice between scheduling flexibility and foundational rights. Because the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is already compatible with worker flexibility, it would be a fatal mistake for Congress to create a carveout for companies that demand “worker flexibility agreements” of their workforce. Corporations already have the ability to deliver flexibility to workers. Instead, they are using this bill to dramatically degrade the quality of work – including the basic requirement that they pay minimum wage and overtime for countless workers across the country.

The National Employment Law Project (NELP) believes that the movement for workers’ rights can defeat the Coalition for Workforce Innovation with worker organizing and policy innovation that expands labor protections and fixes the flaws in the New Deal and FLSA which left Black and immigrant workers segregated and unprotected.

snip

Ocelot II

(115,875 posts)
2. I'm not a big fan of Cuellar, but I'd take commentary from Jacobin with a grain of salt.
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:12 PM
Jul 2022

Or a whole salt mine full of it. Jacobin hates Democrats - all of them, not just Cuellar's ilk - as much as they hate the GOP.

brooklynite

(94,751 posts)
3. Ditto
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:16 PM
Jul 2022

As soon as I saw the descriptive language I was fairly sure it was one of the left leaning voices.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,435 posts)
6. Did he introduce such a bill?
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:27 PM
Jul 2022

If so, why isn't that the reason for ire instead of the fact that someone publicized it?

Sympthsical

(9,126 posts)
8. How about the National Employment Law Project?
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:31 PM
Jul 2022
https://www.nelp.org/news-releases/statement-in-response-to-the-introduction-of-the-worker-flexibility-and-choice-act/

Earlier this week, backed by the corporate lobby group the Coalition for Workforce Innovation (CWI), which was established to fight against growing workers’ movements, Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY), Congresswoman Michelle Steel (R-CA), and Congressman Henry Cuellar (D-TX) introduced the deceptively named Worker Flexibility and Choice Act (WFCA).

This bill would radically erode fundamental worker protections in the United States to the benefit of big corporations, allowing them to require workers to sign away basic rights as a condition of work. The bill would also establish a second-tier employment class of disproportionately Black and immigrant workers working in arduous and underpaid jobs without minimum labor protections — growing poverty and racialized economic inequality.

The bill seeks to codify the false choice between scheduling flexibility and foundational rights. Because the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) is already compatible with worker flexibility, it would be a fatal mistake for Congress to create a carveout for companies that demand “worker flexibility agreements” of their workforce. Corporations already have the ability to deliver flexibility to workers. Instead, they are using this bill to dramatically degrade the quality of work – including the basic requirement that they pay minimum wage and overtime for countless workers across the country.

The National Employment Law Project (NELP) believes that the movement for workers’ rights can defeat the Coalition for Workforce Innovation with worker organizing and policy innovation that expands labor protections and fixes the flaws in the New Deal and FLSA which left Black and immigrant workers segregated and unprotected.


This is why we can't have nice things. People get so het up about whether or not the "proper" messengers are involved (attack the Left) the actual issue at stake - worker's protections - gets hijacked for a grouse session.

Corporations are looking to steamroll yet more worker protections, but OH MY GOD IT'S LEFTISTS!!@!!!!11!!1q

Priorities.

Ocelot II

(115,875 posts)
11. Sources are important because a source's bias can influence its accuracy.
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:48 PM
Jul 2022

NELP is an organization that is closely associated with labor unions and that advocates for them. Jacobin doesn't distinguish much between Democrats and Republicans, regarding both as imperialist running dogs and traitors to the proletariat, when politicians like Cuellar are really more along the lines of small puppies of colonialists.

Sympthsical

(9,126 posts)
16. So what?
Mon Aug 1, 2022, 12:03 AM
Aug 2022

I managed to google both the text of the bill and the statement by NELP in literally less than 20 seconds.

Instead of talking about what corporations are attempting, let's talk about how much we dislike the Left? Good use of time there?

Like I said, it's why we can't have nice things.

Demsrule86

(68,703 posts)
13. There is no chance of this bill passing...so who cares? I mean I don't care for the guy...just
Sun Jul 31, 2022, 11:51 PM
Jul 2022

want a Democrat in the seat so we can hold the house which is essential.

Celerity

(43,573 posts)
15. well, even the posturing of trying to bin minimum wage and OT pay for a shedload of workers is
Mon Aug 1, 2022, 12:01 AM
Aug 2022

certainly not going to help drive Democratic voter enthusiasm in his district, and is bad look for us all as Democrats, especially as the POS super MAGAt Elise Stefanik and another RWer, Michelle Steele, are the two co-sponsors.

I posted on this 4 days ago, before the Jacobin story was written (I do not post Jacobin anyway, they are far too anti-Democratic party and tried to destroy Buttigieg in the 2020 primaries)

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216977382

no_hypocrisy

(46,214 posts)
19. Reagan used to be an FDR Democrat in the 30s and 40s.
Mon Aug 1, 2022, 05:21 AM
Aug 2022

But once he met Nancy Davis and her RW father, Loyal Davis, not only did he convert to Republicanism, he became as RW as Barry Goldwater.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Antiabortion Democrat Hen...