Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
About Jone's phone (Original Post) dclarston13 Aug 2022 OP
That has occurred to me too. hlthe2b Aug 2022 #1
I bet you're right about this FakeNoose Aug 2022 #25
Yes. No way it was attorney "error." They handed the phone over to opposing counsel. Irish_Dem Aug 2022 #2
There are occasions when a defense attorney must report crimes committed by his client LastDemocratInSC Aug 2022 #6
Exactly, they could not sit on serious crimes. Irish_Dem Aug 2022 #7
Spot on duckworth969 Aug 2022 #30
If that was the motive, there is/was a proper way to proceed. Begin by, "May we approach the bench?" 3Hotdogs Aug 2022 #9
It might have been the child pornography. Beakybird Aug 2022 #3
My thought as well. thucythucy Aug 2022 #5
Exactly. They hated him anyway, and the child porn was the last straw. Irish_Dem Aug 2022 #8
There was child porn on the phone? pnwest Aug 2022 #12
I've read reports of this here at DU Beakybird Aug 2022 #13
The porn was just spam sent to Jones' phone. zuul Aug 2022 #15
You ever had actual child porn sent to your phone? Nevilledog Aug 2022 #26
in 2019 NBC reported that the Jones was in possession of child pornography and that counsel had Celerity Aug 2022 #33
I know where the report came from. Nevilledog Aug 2022 #36
LoL -- well, if Alex said he didn't peek at porn, it must be true... allegorical oracle Aug 2022 #35
Jones's. MrsCoffee Aug 2022 #4
I had not thought about the mistrial aspect dclarston13 Aug 2022 #14
I agree with the mistrial idea. zanana1 Aug 2022 #18
Maybe the attorney didn't want to suborn perjury. Skid mark lied under oath. Full stop. Comfortably_Numb Aug 2022 #10
That's my thought as well. thucythucy Aug 2022 #21
Gonna need a lot more popcorn LunaSea Aug 2022 #11
Love it - thanks for sharing this! Talitha Aug 2022 #29
Perfect! Love it! Scottie Mom Aug 2022 #37
I strongly doubt it Mike_in_LA Aug 2022 #16
I found it interesting how Jones' WA-03 Democrat Aug 2022 #17
Or... kentuck Aug 2022 #19
Jones' lawyer H2O Man Aug 2022 #20
Jones' or Jones's obamanut2012 Aug 2022 #22
Both ARandomPerson Aug 2022 #32
Cool. Disaffected Aug 2022 #23
Said that to my wife this morning. gibraltar72 Aug 2022 #24
There was a hearing on protective order this morning LetMyPeopleVote Aug 2022 #27
if what the defense attorney said is true, the Plaintiff is in the wrong. Hamlette Aug 2022 #34
I would think an attorney would want to protect their reputation ... Novara Aug 2022 #28
no, there are things a lawyer could do it that instance, giving it to the other side is not is not Hamlette Aug 2022 #31
It was not actually the lawyers who sent it to the other side Evergreen Emerald Aug 2022 #38

hlthe2b

(102,379 posts)
1. That has occurred to me too.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 08:56 AM
Aug 2022

They are representing a monster. At some point, conscience must kick in for the non-sociopathic.

FakeNoose

(32,777 posts)
25. I bet you're right about this
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 11:53 AM
Aug 2022

Maybe they know that Jones is never going to pay their attorney's fees anyway. Might as well screw him while they have the chance.

The jury is going to deliberate for all of 5 minutes. Stick a fork in him - he's done!

Irish_Dem

(47,453 posts)
2. Yes. No way it was attorney "error." They handed the phone over to opposing counsel.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 08:57 AM
Aug 2022

If this was a movie it would be the shocking ending.

Irish_Dem

(47,453 posts)
7. Exactly, they could not sit on serious crimes.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 09:11 AM
Aug 2022

Child porn was the last straw with an asshole of a client.

3Hotdogs

(12,417 posts)
9. If that was the motive, there is/was a proper way to proceed. Begin by, "May we approach the bench?"
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 09:13 AM
Aug 2022

Followed by a request to withdraw from the trial.


Jones is a piece of shit.

BUT

would you hire his lawyers for anything but a traffic ticket after that fiasco? Their career is over.

zuul

(14,628 posts)
15. The porn was just spam sent to Jones' phone.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:00 AM
Aug 2022

I read yesterday that he never read any of them. So this is nothing. Unfortunately.

Celerity

(43,545 posts)
33. in 2019 NBC reported that the Jones was in possession of child pornography and that counsel had
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 05:15 PM
Aug 2022
alerted the FBI. “The FBI advised counsel that its review located numerous additional illegal images, which had apparently been sent to Infowars email address,” the filing says. In response, InfoWars claimed that the pictures were part of a “malware attack attempting to embed” child porn on Jones’ servers.

The phone is thought to shed light on that incident or other illegal activities perpetrated by Jones. “You know what nobody’s thought about yet?” an attorney for the parents was caught saying on a hot mic. “What happens when that phone goes to law enforcement?”

Update: More information about the digital copy of the cell phone has come to light. The document was apparently unintentionally uploaded into a shared Dropbox. At that time, the lawyer for the parents contacted lawyers for Alex Jones, but the latter never responded. According to Texas law, in such situations you must give the opposing party ten days to respond. After the period was over, the parents’ team opened the file and saw two years of records from Jones’ phone. The texts and emails include the dates of the 2020 election and January 6th insurrection, and since Jones is an influential figure in conservative circles, it could shed light on the behind-the-scenes efforts to coordinate sedition.

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/law-order-writer-says-alex-195325810.html

Nevilledog

(51,202 posts)
36. I know where the report came from.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 05:24 PM
Aug 2022

I'm saying I'm not really convinced about how the child porn got there.

InfoWars story on how they got there does not carry a lot of weight with me.

MrsCoffee

(5,803 posts)
4. Jones's.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 09:02 AM
Aug 2022

It could be either. A massive fuck up or a massive fuck you to Jones.

Given the quality of lawyers those in lalaland hire these days, it’s easier to believe it was a massive fuckup. Or maybe it was yet another attempt to provoke a mistrial.

I’d like to believe that someone had some morals and turned on him, but I’m not that optimistic these days.

thucythucy

(8,087 posts)
21. That's my thought as well.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:32 AM
Aug 2022

Someone finally looked at the content and said, "Oh fuck, the asshole perjured himself! We can't sit on this!"

I also would have thought they would first approach the judge, and for all we know maybe they did.

But would his attorney be required to tell Jones about this? I'm not an attorney so I don't know.

Not that it would have made any difference, The questions would have been much the same, and the evidence of perjury would still be there, even if Jones had been warned beforehand. I think all that would have happened is that he'd have had some time to prepare better bullshit.

Mike_in_LA

(187 posts)
16. I strongly doubt it
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:18 AM
Aug 2022

Without knowing the process or the rules:

1) Doing that would be blatant cause for disbarrment and possibly even sanctions or changes

2) this level of negligence alone could be cause for disbarrment.

Please correct me if I'm wrong on either or both.

WA-03 Democrat

(3,055 posts)
17. I found it interesting how Jones'
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:20 AM
Aug 2022

Lawyer asked him on redirect if he turn over evidence and that his attorney just forwarded it to the court. That was like them backing the bus up over him and hitting it again. They knew what they did. They got them to admit it was his and that his lawyers were just doing their job to pass it over.

kentuck

(111,110 posts)
19. Or...
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:23 AM
Aug 2022

The really damaging text messages were deleted?

They did not give them everything?

It could be a scam.

H2O Man

(73,623 posts)
20. Jones' lawyer
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:29 AM
Aug 2022

knew that if he objected to it, the judge would have allowed everything except communications between Jones and him in.

gibraltar72

(7,512 posts)
24. Said that to my wife this morning.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 11:50 AM
Aug 2022

He apparently had ten days to undo it, but didn't. Either a courageous act which he can't take credit for. Or a colossal screwup.

Hamlette

(15,412 posts)
34. if what the defense attorney said is true, the Plaintiff is in the wrong.
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 05:15 PM
Aug 2022

it happens. It even happened when we did it all by hard copy but with computers it happens more often. An attorney is considered to be an officer of the court and must return the information and not use it.

The Plaintiff's attorney said yesterday that he notified the defense and defense did not respond. Now defense is saying he did respond. The judge will have to decide.

Novara

(5,851 posts)
28. I would think an attorney would want to protect their reputation ...
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 12:27 PM
Aug 2022

... and this was simply a fuckup by incompetent attorneys. If they wanted to report illegal activity discovered on the phone, there are much, much better ways of doing that without risking your reputation as a complete fuckup.

Come on, we know assholes like Jones are probably way too cheap to hire decent lawyers.

Hamlette

(15,412 posts)
31. no, there are things a lawyer could do it that instance, giving it to the other side is not is not
Thu Aug 4, 2022, 05:09 PM
Aug 2022

one of them. He'd be disbarred immediately. He still might be.

Evergreen Emerald

(13,070 posts)
38. It was not actually the lawyers who sent it to the other side
Fri Aug 5, 2022, 08:09 AM
Aug 2022

It was the legal assistant who did it in error. This is what was stated in court. The lawyer for Jones however did not follow proper procedure to get it returned and secured.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»About Jone's phone