Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

orangecrush

(19,611 posts) Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:40 PM Aug 2022

So Nancy pissed off China's "President for Life"

Xi Jinping managed to kill fair elections for President, much as the orange asshole tried to.

Now that someone has stood up to him, perhaps he will be weakened enough to be removed.

Most people on this planet do not want to live under Trump's / Jinping's style of governance.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So Nancy pissed off China's "President for Life" (Original Post) orangecrush Aug 2022 OP

Fuck him. OAITW r.2.0 Aug 2022 #1

That's what Nancy said.. Deuxcents Aug 2022 #2

Not sure what you mean by Xi managed to "kill fair elections for President" former9thward Aug 2022 #3

OAITW r.2.0

(24,570 posts)

1. Fuck him.

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Thu Aug 4, 2022, 10:54 PM

Aug 2022

He's destroying the centers of innovation in China (Shanghai and Hong Kong, the lead examples)....he's fucking the economic future of China, because he's another Putin/Trump politician. Probably on the same board of directors.

Deuxcents

(16,314 posts)

2. That's what Nancy said..

Reply to OAITW r.2.0 (Reply #1)

Fri Aug 5, 2022, 12:09 AM

Aug 2022

Now he’s throwing a tantrum.

former9thward

(32,068 posts)

3. Not sure what you mean by Xi managed to "kill fair elections for President"

Reply to orangecrush (Original post)

Fri Aug 5, 2022, 12:20 AM

Aug 2022

China has been ruled by the Chinese Communist Party for roughly 73 years. They never have believed in or allowed fair elections for President or any other office. They are a dictatorship and proud of it.

Reply to this discussion