Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 09:55 AM Nov 2012

An angry Mitt Romney discusses his religion.

I ask you, could you imagine Obama ever being able to react to anything in such an angry way? No, he couldn't. The right would paint him as a violent angry black man. Right now they're demonizing Obama for saying the word "revenge". This racist crap me me sick.



http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/11/02/romney-has-temper-tantrum-admits-anti-choice-positions-video/

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
An angry Mitt Romney discusses his religion. (Original Post) sufrommich Nov 2012 OP
CEO in action Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #1
The edhopper Nov 2012 #3
Agreed... Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #6
2nd Coming of Christ (Part B) is in Missouri - says testy Bishop Willard (R) Berlum Nov 2012 #2
He was reframing the guy's questions, so as to make himself out as a victim being attacked. djean111 Nov 2012 #4
You're thinking small, BlueToTheBone Nov 2012 #5
this man's temper would be a disaster as President cally Nov 2012 #7
Without a doubt. I don't believe I've ever seen sufrommich Nov 2012 #8

Berlum

(7,044 posts)
2. 2nd Coming of Christ (Part B) is in Missouri - says testy Bishop Willard (R)
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 10:02 AM
Nov 2012

Part A of the Second Coming is, as you undoubtedly already know, on the Mount of Olives.

(This vid clip kinda leaves a fella like me confused, since I thought Rev. Moon (R) was the Second Coming of the Republican Christ, but now Moon is dead and stuff and was after all a Moonie not a Mormon and I think there's perhaps a difference. Maybe what we really need to be talking about is the Third Coming of Christ (R), or something).

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
4. He was reframing the guy's questions, so as to make himself out as a victim being attacked.
Sat Nov 3, 2012, 10:14 AM
Nov 2012

Dishonesty - the interviewer as not attacking him, but asking how he can reconcile his church's teachings and government with what he personally believes.
Romney is so arrogant that he doesn't even let others ask questions; he just decides what he wants to say and steamrollers over the questioner.
How on earth can he be a president? He wants to be emperor - dictator - in fact, he seems to think he already is.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»An angry Mitt Romney disc...