Keith Olbermann brought up a good point

[BigmanPigman]

about tRump not being able to run again due to today's events. He posted this a little while ago...

Link to tweet

?s=20&t=vUf5iLOri66y8CfUIl8WSA

[dalton99a]

1. Kick

[panader0]

2. k and r

[wyn borkins]

3. This Posting (OP) Is Clearly Worth Saving (n/t)

[montanacowboy]

4. Pass this along to

Death Santis - he will be thrilled to hear it

[SharonClark]

5. Wouldn't he have to be convicted of the crime?

[SoCalDavidS]

8. Semantics

Stick with the program. It's already Game Over.

[elleng]

6. CRITICALLY important!

[malaise]

7. Litman said the same thing

The party’s over

[BigmanPigman]

11. I always listen to his opinion...

He is usually right on target.

[dchill]

9. I've heard of that as a reason for this particular investigation.

[LakeArenal]

10. He'll just campaign for legal fees and keep that money.

[IbogaProject]

12. If 12 jurors agree

And no appeals make it to the Supreme Court.

[Scrivener7]

13. Kick! But didn't his possession of the fifteen boxes already make him subject to this law?

"willfully and unlawfully conceals or removes"

He already got caught removing all that classified stuff a few months ago.

[Jarqui]

29. According to a report I read, after the 15 boxes were identified,

Trump dragged his feet returning the documents.

I do not recall the print media that reported that. It was only one of them.

MSNBC reported that FBI agents were bringing boxes out of Mar-a-lago tonight.
That's not good news for Trump. He needed them to come out empty handed.

Can't wait for the Trump quotes on Hillary's handling of classified documents to get replayed.

[Scrivener7]

31. But just the fact that he had those boxes some months ago makes him subject to this law.

Shouldn't it?

[Jarqui]

32. I think so

He wasn't supposed to have any of them. That alone is against the law.
Then, once they found out he did have them, he was supposed to return them.
This law is handled quite strictly. Given who he was, they may have tried to cut him some slack (wrongly but ..).
Apparently, he sent some back. But he needed to return all of it.
Clearly, as of June, he didn't.

And there are reports the FBI took a bunch of evidence as a result of their search yesterday.
That will squash a lot of people's objections to the search because it was illegal for him to have it in his possession - especially after they gave him a chance to return it.

The FBI showed up in plain clothes.
Nobody/very few would have known since Trump and most of Mar-a-lago weren't there.

[chowder66]

14. I'm confused. Your title says Keith Olbermann posted but it's Bill Pascrell.

I've been seeing several of these. Is it just me?

[BigmanPigman]

15. Keith posted this post on his Twitter account today.

and I posted it then I saw it on 2 other posts too. So it's the same thing reposted I guess.

[chowder66]

17. I wondered (after I posted) if that might be the case.

For a hot minute I thought I was losing my mind. Then I opened another browser and it was the same.

[USALiberal]

16. Yes!!!

[Samrob]

18. All the super-MAGA-GOP Senators and Reps will not be able to run again, right?

You know they all have hidden correspondence between themselves and Trump.

[H2O Man]

19. Recommended.

[lindysalsagal]

20. Maybe I'll be able to sleep at night...

Please make this true.

[dflprincess]

21. So does that mean DeSantis phoned the tip in?

[BigmanPigman]

22. Wouldn't that be perfect?!?

Someone was working with the FBI from inside Mar A Lago. Maybe it was a Ron lover.

[Rhiannon12866]

23. Now that is the best news of the day!

[Bayard]

24. We were talking about this earlier

Mr. Bayard brings up the point that, Dems need trump to run in 2024, because we could beat him. Some of the other possibles, maybe not.

[BigmanPigman]

25. Mr B may be onto something there.

[flying_wahini]

26. The are going on and on about this on Twitter. MAGAs believe this is all politically motivated.

[BigmanPigman]

27. That's what Fux Ruse has been telling them all day.

They are saying it is "Biden's 's FBI" and not that tRump hand chose the FBI director. His cult doesn't need to think for themselves since they let others do it for them.

[Hotler]

28. But, I don't want the DOJ to stop at this, I want my pound of flesh, this is just a taste..

Team DOJ, don't give up now.

[jg10003]

30. Question: does this apply to elected office? the requirements

For being president are specified in the constitution. Can the requirements be changed by statutory law?