Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nevilledog

(51,122 posts)
Tue Aug 9, 2022, 12:12 PM Aug 2022

Rude Pundit - Note on Democratic Groups Helping Trump Republicans Win Primaries: So?





https://rudepundit.blogspot.com/2022/08/note-on-democratic-groups-helping-elect.html


Note on Democratic Groups Helping Trump Republicans Win Primaries: So?
In one of the great "tut-tut" pieces in a while, the Editorial Board of the New York Times (motto: "We're partly responsible for the Iraq War and Trump's election, but you'll still subscribe&quot wrote that it was appalled by the idea that "Democratic Party groups have been elevating Big Lie proponents over their moderate Republican opponents all year." They take great umbrage - umbrage, I say - that Democrats would dare attempt to give subversive support to the fucknuts and grifters who make coin and get votes by saying that Donald Trump really won the 2020 election and that a conspiracy involving at least a few hundred thousand people worked to keep him out of office. The idea, of course, is that in a general election, those fucknuts and grifters (and, to be fair, the fucknut grifters) will be easily defeated by a Democrat. And what's the big strategy here? Reminding voters who is endorsed by Trump because to some idiot voters, that's like getting oral from Jesus.

But the Times's reasoning is this: electing "moderate Republicans" is a good thing. And what makes you a "moderate" Republican these days? Pretty much if you're not hooting racism into a tin can because an internet ghost told you it will bring about the Great Googamoogle or something.

One example the Times gives of a Big Lie-loving, Trump-endorsed fucknut is Maryland's Dan Cox. It should be pointed out at all times that his campaign website is "Cox for Freedom." No, I'm not lying. Anyways, yeah, Cox is huffing deeply of the fumes from Trump's taint, but in just about every other way, he's your average fucking mad Republican. He supports guns for babies (or something close - you really can't tell anymore), is a nutzoid on abortion, and hates him some critical race theory in schools. You know who else supports all those things except is a little more distant from Trump's grundle stink? Cox's opponent, Kelly Schulz. Oh, and groups like the Democratic Governors' Association bought ads saying that Cox was endorsed by Trump.

Here's the thing, though. No one forced those voters to go for Cox. They were adults making adult decisions.

Look at the even more bugfuck mad Kari Lake in Arizona. She campaigned on shitting in the dried up Lake Mead and laughing while she did it. Yet she won her primary. So, clearly, Republican voters in Arizona are good with attacks on wokeness and anti-choice madness (by the way, one interesting thing about Lake? She's for making almost all birth control available over-the counter and having the government pay for it. Hmm). But other than her support of the Big Lie and her vows to change Arizona voting laws so that this thing that never happened never happens again, her defeated opponent, Karrin Taylor Robson believes pretty much the same damn thing. Again, the key difference is that Lake got the help of Democratic groups because they hope crazy will lose.

But the key point here is that they're all fucking crazy; nearly every Republican is nuts. And even the ones who aren't explicitly saying that the 2020 election was stolen are calling for election "reform" or support gerrymandering and other shit that will hinder voting and help the GOP undo democracy. So maybe we need a little less garment-rending over the idea that Democrats' bet that the general election voters won't give a nod to the crazies will fail and a little more over the fact that it simply doesn't fucking matter which Republicans are elected.

And also let's not pretend that the right doesn't do this shit all the time. As Judd Legum and Kyle Tharp reported, a Republican-linked group is attempting to influence liberal members of Congress to vote against the climate change legislation by pretending to be a liberal group. The motherfuckery is deep in our politics.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rude Pundit - Note on Democratic Groups Helping Trump Republicans Win Primaries: So? (Original Post) Nevilledog Aug 2022 OP
I'm Florida a repuke paid a man who had the same last Phoenix61 Aug 2022 #1
to me llashram Aug 2022 #2
Just to note, here is one of those ads so-called """supporting""" a Republican: W_HAMILTON Aug 2022 #3
I am fine with trying everything we can to beat Republicans...none of them are worth a damn. Demsrule86 Aug 2022 #4

llashram

(6,265 posts)
2. to me
Tue Aug 9, 2022, 12:52 PM
Aug 2022

their attempts at bothsiderism's get old, very old. I never gave them a subscription. Did buy elsewhere though. Just like NPR and the Iraqui wars they supported, I started listening much less.

W_HAMILTON

(7,869 posts)
3. Just to note, here is one of those ads so-called """supporting""" a Republican:
Tue Aug 9, 2022, 12:55 PM
Aug 2022


As I've said many times recently any time this argument is brought up: it's a bullshit media narrative, the type you often see them use against Democrats.

Rightfully calling out an extremist Trump lackey is not """supporting""" them.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rude Pundit - Note on Dem...