General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOpinion: A seismic shift in Trump's legal woes.
Source: CNN:Opinion by Norman Eisen, E. Danya Perry and Dennis Aftergut
Updated 11:47 AM ET, Tue August 9, 2022
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
The search warrant executed on former President Donald Trump's premises at Mar-a-Lago represents a seismic shift in the overall landscape of the investigations against him. We have long forecast his deepening legal peril, but this puts an exclamation point on his exposure. As a nation, we are now rapidly headed into barely charted waters.
While the facts are just beginning to emerge, we know that on Monday morning a group of FBI agents executed a search warrant and conducted an exacting examination of the property, including accessing a safe, according to Trump, and leaving with a quantity of documents, according to a CNN source. Trump reacted with predictable outrage, claiming that his home was "under siege, raided, and occupied" and that "Nothing like this has ever happened to a President of the United States before."
He's correct on that last point. But we have never seen evidence of this kind of behavior by a president before either. CNN is reporting that the focus of the search warrant is on documents that Trump removed from the White House, including some 15 boxes of materials that have now been recovered. These materials reportedly included classified documents.
There are serious penalties, including criminal ones, for removing, damaging or destroying any official government document. The law treats a mishandling of classified documents even more severely. But even in the case of nonclassified documents, the penalties for mishandling can include disqualification from holding future federal office (although that would be a protracted process and Trump might challenge it on multiple grounds, including arguing that it impermissibly varies the constitutional qualifications for the presidency).
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2022/08/09/opinions/trump-fbi-search-mar-a-lago-eisen-aftergut-perry/index.html
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Is that true? If so, they collected much more than 15 boxes of documents.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)I wasn't putting her out as any kind of expert. Maybe just someone who'd heard something I hadn't. I'm not a journalist, and I'm not reporting this as news.
NickB79
(19,253 posts)So they already knew he'd taken documents. They got a search warrant because he hadn't returned everything they suspected he'd taken.
wryter2000
(46,051 posts)Thanks
Novara
(5,843 posts)I keep repeating what I've heard legal experts say today (I've been listening to coverage of this all day), but those who've worked in the DOJ say that in order to get this many top people to authorize this sort of a really serious, unprecedented search warrant, the have compelling, fresh evidence of an ongoing crime. If they just wanted material that he should have returned, they could have issued a subpoena. Having FBI agents come themselves with a search warrant means there's evidence of a very serious crime (not that taking classified documents isn't serious, but more serious than even that) and it's a matter of urgency.
I am just repeating what I've heard, but I've heard it from several different people in the field who know this stuff. It isn't just one guy's opinion; several of them have said the same thing.
Stuart G
(38,436 posts)PortTack
(32,778 posts)pwb
(11,276 posts)she can be trusted.
H2O Man
(73,559 posts)on his golf course.
Hekate
(90,714 posts)MiniMe
(21,717 posts)You are a former President. Yes, it does make a difference
Hekate
(90,714 posts)Please.