A flaw in Trumps defense regarding "he can declassify anything, he doesn't need a paper trail."

[Swede]

Link to tweet

?s=20&t=jRqgzuK1bipVlaWgUBPdyA

[Arazi]

1. Obviously Biden did "re-classify" them since his DOJ labeled them as such

The stupid Rs never think this through…

The warrant FROM BIDEN’S DOJ has them labeled as classified.

Plus #Traitor was told they were classified multiple times.

(This is all beyond the fact that it doesn’t matter since the statutes in the search warrant aren’t determinative about classifications anyway)

[Phoenix61]

5. Spot on.

That FAUX etal are so focused on the security classification is the first clue it has nothing to do with anything. It’s a red herring.

[Walleye]

2. It's bizarre the way they are expecting us just to take the word of a pathological liar

[BootinUp]

6. Watch his eyes.

Turn the sound down, its Nunes strange attempt to confuse.

Link to tweet

[Midnight Writer]

8. Hope someone asked these guests what they think Trump was going to do with the documents.

Why is he taking dozens of boxes out of the White House and putting them in his basement?

Why is he risking all of this legal liability over these papers? He must have a plan for using them. And that plan can't be legal.

[Walleye]

9. Was he blinking a code message to Putin? I couldn't listen the eyes were too distracting

[sanatanadharma]

3. Documents in Clinton's possesion had been (re)classified after the fact

I'd like to see all of Trump's 'documents' reclassified at the highest possible secrecy, so Trump can experience the same as did Clinton.

Billboard, internet ad, radio voice, text message:
"Trump had "So top-secret secrets that the destruction of America is the guaranteed result of this knowledge in others' hands", death penalty stuff."

[Wounded Bear]

4. trump has a paper trail...

[FSogol]

7. But Trumpy said "no take backs!"

Kash Patel is a childish clown. So is anyone defending Trumpy.