!!!Another Trump Search Warrant (not related to the search of Mar-a-Lago)

[kpete]

A Department of Justice filing this morning indicates that the “other” search warrant signed by Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart on August 5 is not related to the search of Mar-a-Lago.

Link to tweet

?s=21&t=A3WDsHTnhSwm62vCm4v7aQ

[Farmer-Rick]

1. Well, they really need to search all his properties

A smart thief would not stash all his loot in one place.

[Rebl2]

11. That's

what I think too.

[flying_wahini]

16. Especially in an unlocked storage closet....

[Probatim]

22. Are you accusing tfg of being smart?

That could get you banned here lol.

(I actually giggled as I typed this.)

[Pluvious]

27. Those with fame and power attract their own Turd Blossoms to guide and advise nt.

[yobrault1]

28. the only issue I have with your statement is use of the word

"smart".

[OMGWTF]

30. Search Ivana's coffin.

How can the cremated remains of an old woman cause TEN men to struggle to carry her coffin?

That, coupled with her extremely odd gravesite location and the weird Saudi golf tournament at the same place, would have been the perfect time to give the Saudis what they bought for $2B.

[Jarqui]

2. wonder if the warrant is for a wiretap ? ...nt

[liberalla]

3. Well, well, well... the plot thickens

[calimary]

20. No kidding!

And the walls close in…

[BComplex]

4. Wondering what they found in the other search that leads them to this warrant.

Must have found something in the first search that points to other crimes.

Blackmail, maybe?

[AZSkiffyGeek]

6. It says this is unrelated

I'm not sure why the OP thinks that means this has anything to do with Trump.
The judge signed two warrants on the same day. One for Mar-A-Lago, and another that is unrelated.

[oregonjen]

8. Unrelated to Trump or related to Trump, but unrelated to the MAL search?

It’s unclear to me.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

9. Well, when I see something is unrelated...

I don't assume it actually is related and post that it is.

[demmiblue]

13. +1

Not surprising, though.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

5. Doesn't that say the exact opposite?

UNRELATED

[BComplex]

7. Well, the first warrant they were looking for government documents. They might

have found those photos to be used for BLACKMAIL, which is unrelated to the government documents.

[PCIntern]

10. I had been thinking that

perhaps one of the blackmail victims “squealed” which can happen if he or she feels that they’ve been cornered.

[LeftInTX]

12. There is no indication that Trump or anyone connected to Trump is the subject of this warrant

It's another warrant filed by the Southern District of Florida as the same day as Trump's. Courts have numerous cases going on at the same time and file numerous warrants on any given day.

It could be for a random Joe Blow who is selling drugs on the street. No relation to Trump at all.

[Hugh_Lebowski]

15. Could just be they cited the wrong case

number, and the court is just responding 'hey, dipshits, that's not even your case' in a polite manner.

Seems possible

Edit: oops, request was filed by a newspaper. Anyways ... same principle applies. Could just be they submitted the entirely wrong case number.

[malaise]

14. FISA?

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm!

[keopeli]

18. Do we even know this is a "Trump" search warrant? It doesn't say that.

All it says is that a newspaper requested the judge unseal TWO cases. It says nothing about how they got the number of the second case, why it was also requested, who or what the second case is about, or anything other than the second case is NOT related at all to the first.

I wonder why the newspaper requested the second case be unsealed and how they got that number in the first place.

[Bernardo de La Paz]

23. Exactly. . . . nt

[kpete]

26. the text:

[Layzeebeaver]

19. And what about the letter motion to unseal?

I think it would be good to see that for context.

[Heather MC]

21. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Can't wait for the perpwalk

[33taw]

24. Court filings are sequential. I would check case captions that are before, after and between

the two cases referenced. They are likely e-filed and available publicly through Pacer public access. [link:https://pacer.uscourts.gov|

[Jarqui]

25. This blogger has been looking into the warrant, etc

https://file411.substack.com/p/siri-what-is-espionage-and-why-cant

He is wondering if there is a 3rd warrant for phone records

Looks like Times Union found the second case# using Pacer

It's quite a lengthy blog. I have not had time to digest it all. I am not familiar with the blogger.
I can't attest to the credibility of the site so be cautious - take it with a big grain of salt.
But it looks like he's done a bunch of work looking at it.

There is another seemingly related link discussing it that should be treated similarly
https://file411.substack.com/p/attorney-general-garland-has-a-few

I found them searching via google for the second case#

But again, I do not have time to go through them.
They might have something that sheds light on what is going on ...

[LaMouffette]

29. I wonder if they're going to exhume Ivanna next. God only knows what they would find.