General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI Didn't Want It to Be True, but the Medium Really Is the Message
New York Times, Opinion by EZRA KLEIN
There is truth to this, of course. But there is less truth to it than to the opposite. McLuhans view is that mediums matter more than content; its the common rules that govern all creation and consumption across a medium that change people and society. Oral culture teaches us to think one way, written culture another. Television turned everything into entertainment, and social media taught us to think with the crowd.
snip
In his prophetic 1985 book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, Postman argued that the dystopia we must fear is not the totalitarianism of George Orwells 1984 but the narcotized somnolence of Aldous Huxleys Brave New World. Television teaches us to expect that anything and everything should be entertaining. But not everything should be entertainment, and the expectation that it will be is a vast social and even ideological change. He is at pains to distance himself from the critics who lament so-called junk television:
I raise no objection to televisions junk. The best things on television are its junk, and no one and nothing is seriously threatened by it. Besides, we do not measure a culture by its output of undisguised trivialities but by what it claims as significant. Therein is our problem, for television is at its most trivial and, therefore, most dangerous when its aspirations are high, when it presents itself as a carrier of important cultural conversations. The irony here is that this is what intellectuals and critics are constantly urging television to do. The trouble with such people is that they do not take television seriously enough.
Free gift article from the New York Times. No paywall with this link:
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/07/opinion/media-message-twitter-instagram.html?unlocked_article_code=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACEIPuomT1JKd6J17Vw1cRCfTTMQmqxCdw_PIxftm3iWka3DFDm4diOMNAo6B_EGKYKdvZtJ22jmAX9ZOPfozW_1u0uJFek1rUBWhrYGNndIFPyAx48qVb18B4qjsD_o-4CO4KS6wMvt-z7my-B-LbmK-Ua3UzXQmd1x6pcc0fUWh33ZZ2q-VR-Ml3NkqjforB4toBmtVPFn8tPHuDh57PNuDbwiNqVVlHrEEBkyA2IKU-LkCcw5NCFPZTHwZ4Wk06N9UO9p_L7-oZld7O5K42eNNfzQueIS5BJQxRJzWn6FptdPOrh-PzMm2xpYmBaimicp9-YGJoJh21JAMPcQ&smid=url-share
gab13by13
(21,353 posts)I said a couple years ago that we were turning into "A Brave New World." Time for some football, er soma.
PatSeg
(47,489 posts)I actually just read the book a year ago and I was struck by many parallels. I watched some of the recent mini-series, but when it started to diverge too much from the book, I lost interest.
llmart
(15,540 posts)Thanks for posting this.
PatSeg
(47,489 posts)cbabe
(3,547 posts)Last edited Tue Aug 16, 2022, 08:24 PM - Edit history (1)
https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/228250.Four_Arguments_for_the_Elimination_of_TelevisionFour Arguments for the Elimination of Television/Jerry Mander
A total departure from previous writing about television, this book is the first ever to advocate that the medium is not reformable. Its problems are inherent in the technology itself and are so dangerous -- to personal health and sanity, to the environment, and to democratic processes -- that TV ought to be eliminated forever.
Weaving personal experiences through meticulous research, the author ranges widely over aspects of television that have rarely been examined and never before joined together, allowing an entirely new, frightening image to emerge. The idea that all technologies are "neutral," benign instruments that can be used well or badly, is thrown open to profound doubt. Speaking of TV reform is, in the words of the author, "as absurd as speaking of the reform of a technology such as guns."
(A 1978 classic. Former ad executive talks technology not content. Kill your tv scary.)
PatSeg
(47,489 posts)Sometimes I feel that television was some sort of gateway drug for what we are experiencing today with the Internet.
cbabe
(3,547 posts)PatSeg
(47,489 posts)I went and looked up the book and saw it was over 40 years old, which I found surprising.
cbabe
(3,547 posts)spotted.) cheers.
brooklynite
(94,589 posts)PatSeg
(47,489 posts)amount of escapism in any era. However, I've known people who were very addicted to television and now many of them are addicted to social media.
Meanwhile, I think television is much different today than it was when the book was written. Unfortunately, a lot of people still watch dumbed down shows even though there is a lot of high quality programming available. Most reality TV shows are much like the carnival freak shows of other eras.
brooklynite
(94,589 posts)...both conservatives and liberals. Anyone can OD on what's available.
PatSeg
(47,489 posts)Actually I used to watch far too much cable news, but now I watch 1/2-1 hour a day during the week, unless there is a big story like this past week. With all the horror of the Trump years, I really needed more escapism TV and I weaned myself off cable news.
Rachel M at 6 pm
(115 posts)"Watching Donald Trump tweet his way to the presidency felt like some sinister apotheosis, as though wed rubbed the monkeys paw and gotten our horrible wish. We didnt want to be bored, and now we never would be."
PatSeg
(47,489 posts)How many of us truly crave some good old fashion boredom.
Rachel M at 6 pm
(115 posts)On the day after Biden's inauguration, marmar wrote exactly what I was feeling...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100214979590