General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans Turn Against the League of Women Voters
The league, long known for focusing on voter registration and other fundamentals, became more willing to speak boldly during the Trump era. Now, some on the right are portraying it as a tool of the radical left.
The League of Women Voters, while that sounds like a nice organization, they dont do a lot of nice work, Catalina Lauf, a Republican candidate for Congress in Illinois, said in a video posted in May on Instagram, explaining her reasoning for refusing to participate in a league-sponsored debate.
The league, she claimed, peddles Marxist ideology and is anti-American. In an interview with ProPublica, Lauf cited the leagues support for the rights of transgender student athletes as one reason she is suspicous of the group. She also claimed the league has endorsed the defunding of police departments, though that is inaccurate. The league has, however, taken stands in favor of sweeping police reforms that would address brutality and racial profiling.
They need to switch their brand fast, Lauf said. Because their hyperpartisanship is turning off a lot of women who just want common sense.
Conservative candidates for school board and county supervisor in Wisconsin have fired similar broadsides when declining to participate in league debates. And in Pennsylvania this year, only 30% of Republican candidates completed the leagues VOTE411.org informational guide for the primaries, compared with 70% of Democrats, according to the League of Women Voters of Pennsylvania. The guide gives voters the candidates unedited answers to questions about their qualifications, priorities and stances on certain issues.
https://www.propublica.org/article/league-of-women-voters-gop-trump?utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter#1395365
Ocelot II
(115,732 posts)If you're not overtly and stridently pro-Trump you're a dangerous Marxist.
herding cats
(19,565 posts)I was working the election and the R prescient election judge came in and pulled all the material by them explaining the ballot. It was a first I'd ever seen anyone call them partisan or liberal.
Biophilic
(3,665 posts)Hekate
(90,714 posts)Nittersing
(6,362 posts)fixed it
summer_in_TX
(2,739 posts)itself and its relevance coming up to its 100Th birthday in 2019.
It acknowledged a flawed and sometimes racist past, but also concluded that its mission of Educating voters and defending democracy was still vital, and that this venerable organization with state chapters in all 50 states and many local Leagues that had built up trust through their reputation for nonpartisanship could leverage that to have a positive impact,
As part of its soul-searching, it added a co-equal plank to its mission, to advocate for diversity and full inclusion. They elected the first black president the League had had, and a CEO whose family is multi-racial.
In response to the rapid erosion of democracy, many did become more involved in lawsuits to counter voter roll purges and other threats to rights.
The suffragettes were very strong, intelligent, activist women, their granddaughters and great granddaughters are too. When things were going smoothly they got a bland reputation, as if they were the nonpartisan questions they carefully construct for Vote411.org (their award winning online version of the printed Voters Guide).
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)Roe, Roe, Roe your vote
against theocracy!
Republicans revoke your rights
and kill democracy!
hamsterjill
(15,221 posts)Even Republican women hate women. Its disgusting.
How could any woman in her right mind EVER vote for a freaking Republican!!!!
MurrayDelph
(5,299 posts)that vote.
Mc Mike
(9,114 posts)The reich wing never changes.