General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBillions in 'dark money' is influencing US politics. We need disclosure laws
David Sirota and Joel Warner
Mon 29 Aug 2022 06.19 EDT
A donor secretly transferred $1.6bn to a Republican political group. Because of Americas lax laws, the donation was never disclosed in any public record or database
?width=620&quality=85&fit=max&s=d86ef15741a9dd07ef01fd1d5cbceaf8
This week, the Lever, ProPublica and the New York Times discovered the largest known political advocacy donation in American history. We exposed a reclusive billionaires secret transfer of $1.6bn to a political group controlled by the Republican operative Leonard Leo, who spearheaded the construction of a conservative supreme court supermajority to end abortion, block government regulations, stymie the fight against climate change and limit voting rights.
This anonymous donation which flowed to a tax-exempt trust that was never disclosed in any public record or database was probably completely legal.
Whether you support or abhor Leos crusade, we should be able to agree on one larger non-partisan principle: such enormous sums of money should not be able to influence elections, lawmakers, judicial nominations and public policy in secret. And we should not have to rely on a rare leak to learn basic campaign finance facts that should be freely available to anyone.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2022/aug/29/billions-in-dark-money-is-influencing-us-politics-we-need-disclosure-laws
This jerk basically bought three+ Us Supreme Court Justices and more people to be put on the bench....and Sheldon White House D- Rhode Island has it right....
https://www.whitehouse.senate.gov/news/release/whitehouse-cicilline-introduce-disclose-act-to-repair-americans-faith-in-democracy
bullimiami
(13,095 posts)1) Corporations are not people.
2) A person is one person. Period. Same limits for everyone.
jimfields33
(15,807 posts)This is a easy one to get through.
Progressive dog
(6,904 posts)but it won't be. The wanna be authoritarians will hold SCOTUS for decades unless there is a wave of voters turning their enablers out of office. Is it going to happen? IMO probably not.
crickets
(25,980 posts)We need more than disclosure, however. The ability to throw around this amount of money in politics should be abolished entirely.